Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Ethics of Human EnhancementUnderstanding the Debate$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, Tony Coady, Alberto Giubilini, and Sagar Sanyal

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780198754855

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754855.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 January 2019

Levelling the Playing Field

Levelling the Playing Field

On the Alleged Unfairness of the Genetic Lottery

Chapter:
(p.198) 14 Levelling the Playing Field
Source:
The Ethics of Human Enhancement
Author(s):

Michael Hauskeller

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754855.003.0014

It is frequently argued that human enhancement is not only morally permissible but also morally obligatory: we have a moral duty to provide people with opportunities to enhance themselves. This duty to enhance is sometimes believed to follow from the fact that our natural abilities are not evenly distributed, that what we can and cannot do is to a large extent the result of a ‘genetic (or natural) lottery’. Thus people’s chances in life are, through no fault of their own, hampered by a ‘genetic inequality’, which, being entirely undeserved is clearly unfair. To ensure fairness, we are thus morally obligated to redress the situation and ‘level the playing field’. However, it is not entirely clear whether it actually makes sense to declare a natural condition, which is not in any way the result of human agency and is thus not a proper subject of distributive justice, to be ‘unfair’. This chapter looks into this claim and investigates to what extent it is plausible.

Keywords:   fairness, distributive justice, genetic lottery, natural lottery, human enhancement, genetic inequality, duty to enhance

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .