Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Analysis and Metaphysics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

P. F. Strawson

Print publication date: 1992

Print ISBN-13: 9780198751182

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198751182.001.0001

Moore and Quine

Chapter:
(p. 29 ) 3 Moore and Quine
Source:
Analysis and Metaphysics
Author(s):

P. F. Strawson

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198751182.003.0003

This chapter discusses the opinions of philosophers George Edward Moore and Willard Van Orman Quine on the issue of conceptual analysis. Moore considers most philosophical tasks and problems as belonging to the realm of metaphysics, or more appropriately ontology, while questions the nature and foundations of knowledge as belonging to a department of philosophy he calls logic. Quine refers to general logical notions of contemporary logic and its notation as canonical notations. By this, he means the notation embodies or reveals a clear and absolutely general framework that is adequate for all propositional thinking, whatever the subject matter.

Keywords:   conceptual analysis, George Edward Moore, Willard Van Orman Quine, metaphysics, ontology, logic, canonical notations, propositional thinking

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .