Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Taking Sides in PeacekeepingImpartiality and the Future of the United Nations$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Emily Paddon Rhoads

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780198747246

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: June 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747246.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 13 December 2018

From Passive to Assertive Impartiality

From Passive to Assertive Impartiality

Chapter:
(p.46) 2 From Passive to Assertive Impartiality
Source:
Taking Sides in Peacekeeping
Author(s):

Emily Paddon Rhoads

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747246.003.0003

This chapter traces the evolution of impartiality over six decades of peacekeeping practice. It explicates the reasons for the reconceptualization of impartiality in the new millennium and situates this change in a broader shift towards a more assertive liberal internationalism. As peacekeepers and other international actors became more heavily engaged in intra-state conflict during the 1990s, in contexts where consent for their operations was tenuous, they confronted difficult questions about the sources of their authority and how to adjudicate between competing local claimants of authority. Assertive impartiality was an attempt to re-ground authority in what was presented as a newfound unity of purpose: the culmination of the internationalization of human rights, and supposed disassociation of rights from a particular political agenda. Crucially, however, institutionalization of the new conception of impartiality did not result in conceptual clarity. The chapter concludes by examining the ways in which the norm is ambiguous and imprecise.

Keywords:   impartiality, peacekeeping, history, United Nations, use of force, consent, protection, humanitarianism, international criminal justice

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .