Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought$

Daniel Lee

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780198745167

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745167.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 15 August 2018

(p.321) Bibliography

(p.321) Bibliography

Source:
Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Roman law sources

Codex Iustinianus. Ed. Paul Krueger. Berlin: Weidmann, 1954.

Codicis. Ed. Denis Godefroy. Lyon, 1604.

Digesta Iustiniani. Ed. Theodor Mommsen and Paul Krueger. Berlin: Weidmann, 1870.

The Digest of Justinian. 4 Vols. Trans. Alan Watson. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985.

Digestum Novum seu Pandectarum Iuris Civilis. Ed. Denis Godefroy. Lyon, 1604.

Digestum Vetus seu Pandectarum Iuris Civilis. Ed Denis Godefroy. Lyon, 1604.

Infortiatum seu Pandectarum Iuris Civilis. Ed. Denis Godefroy. Lyon, 1604.

The Institutes of Gaius. Ed. Francis de Zulueta. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953.

The Institutes of Justinian. Ed. J.B. Moyle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1913.

Institutionum sive Primorum Totius Iurisprudentiae Elementorum. Ed. Denis Godefroy. Lyon, 1604.

The Twelve Tables. In Ancient Roman Statutes. Ed. Allan Chester Johnson et al. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1961.

Volumen Legum Parvum. Ed. Denis Godefroy. Lyon, 1604.

Sources

Abizadeh, Arash. “On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem.” American Political Science Review 106 (2012): 867–82.

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People. 2 Vols. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1993.

“An Agreement of the People” [1647]. In The English Levellers. Ed. Andrew Sharp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Alciato, Andrea. Commentaria in Digesta seu Pandectas Iuris Civilis. In Opera Omnia. 4 Vols. Basel: Thomas Guarinus, 1582.

Allen, J.W. A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century. 2nd ed. London: Methuen, 1941.

Althusius, Johannes. Politica Methodice Digesta. Ed. Carl Friedrich. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1932.

Althusius, Johannes. Politics of Johannes Althusius. Trans. Frederick Carney. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1995.

(p.322) Amar, Akhil. “Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V.” Columbia Law Review 94 (1994): 457–508.

Anderson, Perry. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso, 1979.

Ando, Clifford. “A Dwelling Beyond Violence: On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Contemporary Republicans.” History of Political Thought 31 (2010): 183–220.

Ando, Clifford. “From Republic to Empire.” In The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World. Ed. Michael Peachin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Ando, Clifford. Law, Language, and Empire in the Roman Tradition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.

Ando, Clifford. “The Origins and Import of Republican Constitutionalism.” Cardozo Law Review 34 (2013): 917–35.

Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 Vols. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.

Armstrong, E. “The Political Theory of the Huguenots.” English Historical Review 9 (1889): 13–40.

Arnisaeus, Henning. De Iure Maiestatis Libri Tres. Frankfurt, 1610.

Arnisaeus, Henning. De Autoritate Principum in Populum Semper Inviolabili. Frankfurt, 1612.

Arnisaeus, Henning. Doctrina Politica. Amsterdam, 1651.

Arumäus, Dominicus. Discursus Academici de Iure Publico. 3 Vols. Jena, 1620.

Azo [Azo Portius]. Summa Azonis. Lyon, 1557. [Reprinted Frankfurt am Main, 1968]

Azo [Azo Portius]. Summa Azonis, Locuples Iuris Civilis Thesaurus. Venice, 1566.

Azo [Azo Portius]. Lectura Azonis et Magni Apparatus ad Singulas Leges Duodecim Librorum Codicis Iustiniani. Paris, 1581.

Bacon, Francis. “Maxims on Law.” In The Works of Francis Bacon in Ten Volumes. Vol. 4. London: J. Johnson, 1803.

Bacon, Francis. “A View of the Differences in Question Betwixt the King’s Bench and the Council in the Marches.” In The Letters and the Life of Francis Bacon. Vol. 3. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1868.

Badouin, François. De Institutione Historiae Universae et Eius Cum Iurisprudentia Coniunctione Prologomena Libri II. Paris, 1561.

Bakos, Adrianna. Images of Kingship in Early Modern France: Louis XI in Political Thought, 1560-1789. London: Routledge, 1997.

Baldus de Ubaldis. Commentaria. 9 Vols. Venice, 1577.

Barber, Nick. The Constitutional State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Barclay, William. De Regno et Regali Potestate Adversus Buchananum, Brutum, Boucherium, et Reliquos Monarchomachos, Libri Sex. Paris: Chavdiere, 1600.

Baricave, Jean de. La Defense de la Monarchie. Toulouse, 1614.

Barker, Ernest. “The Authorship of the Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos.Cambridge Historical Journal 3 (1930): 164–81.

(p.323) Baron, Eguinaire. De Ratione Dicendi Discendique Iuris Civilis ad Studiosam Legum Inventutem Commonefactio. 1546.

Baron, Hans. Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance: Civic Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Classicism and Tyranny. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955.

Bartolus of Sassoferrato. Commentaria cum Adnotationibus Thomae Diplovatii. Ed. Baptista de Tortiis. Venice, 1506. [Facsimile reprint Ed. G. Polara, Rome 1996]

Bartolus of Sassoferrato. Opera Quae Extant Opera. 10 Vols. Venice, 1590.

Bartolus of Sassoferrato. De Regimine Civitatis. In Politica d Diritto nel Trecento Italiano. Ed. Diego Quaglioni. Florence: Leo S. Olschki Editore, 1983.

Bayle, Pierre. Dictionnaire Historique et Critique. Rotterdam, 1720.

Bebenburg, Lupold von. De Iuribus et Translatione Imperii. Strasbourg, 1508.

Bebenburg, Lupold von. Tractatus de Iuribus Regni et Imperii Romanorum. Strasbourg, 1624.

Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Bellomo, Manlio. Common Legal Past of Europe, 1000–1800. Trans. Lydia Cochrane. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1995.

Berckringer, Daniel. Institutiones Politicae sive de Republica. Utrecht, 1662.

Berman, Harold. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.

Bertrachini, Giovanni. Repertorium Iuris Utriusque. Nürnberg, c.1483.

Besold, Christopher. Dissertatio Politica-Iuridica, de Maiestate in Genere. Tübingen, 1625.

Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.

Bickerton, Christopher, et al., ed. Politics without Sovereignty: A Critique of International Relations. London: UCL Press, 2007.

Birks, Peter. “The Roman Law Concept of Dominium and the Idea of Absolute Ownership.” Acta Juridica 1 (1985): 1–37.

Black, Antony. Monarchy and Community: Political Ideas in the Later Conciliar Controversy, 1430–1450. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

Blackwood, Adam. Adversus Georgii Buchanani Dialogus, De Iure Regni Apud Scotos, Pro Regibus Apologia. Paris: A. Sittart, 1588.

Blair, Ann. “Authorial Strategies in Jean Bodin.” In The Reception of Bodin. Ed. Howell Lloyd. Leiden: Brill, 2013.

Blair, Ann. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information Before the Modern Age. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.

Blank, Andreas. “Johannes Felden on Usucaption, Justice, and the Society of States.” Journal of the History of Ideas 74 (2013): 403–23.

Bodin, Jean. Methodus ad Facilem Historiarum Cognitionem. Paris, 1566.

Bodin, Jean. Ivris Vniversi Distribvtio. Paris [Lvtetia]: Jacques Du Puys, 1578.

(p.324) Bodin, Jean. Apologie de René Herpin pour la République de Jean Bodin. Paris, 1581.

Bodin, Jean. Six Livres de la République. Paris: Jacques Du Puys, 1583.

Bodin, Jean. De Republica Lbri VI. Paris: Jacques Du Puys, 1586.

Bodin, Jean. Six Bookes of a Commonweale. Trans. Richard Knolles. London: G. Bishop, 1606.

Bodin, Jean. Method for the Easy Comprehension of History. Trans. Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Norton, 1945.

Bodin, Jean. Exposé du Droit Universel [Iuris Universi Distributio]. Ed. Lucien Jerphagnon, Simone Goyard-Fabre, and René-Marie Rampelberg. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1985.

Bonney, Richard. “Bodin and the Development of the French Monarchy.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society: Fifth Series. 40 (1990): 43–61.

Borkowski, Andrew and Paul Du Plessis. Textbook on Roman Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Borschberg, Peter. “Grotius, the Social Contract and Political Resistance: A Study of the Unpublished Theses LVI.” 2007 [IILJ working paper available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=969250].

Bortius, Matthias. De Natura Iurium Maiestatis et Regalium Explicatio. Jena, 1614.

Bramhall, John. The Serpent Salve, or, a Remedie for the Biting of an Aspe. 1643.

Brett, Annabel. Liberty, Right and Nature. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Brett, Annabel. “Natural Right and Civil Community: The Civil Philosophy of Hugo Grotius.” Historical Journal 45 (2002): 31–51.

Brett, Annabel. Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.

Brito Vieira, Mónica. Elements of Representation. Leiden: Brill, 2009.

Brooke, Christopher. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.

Brown, John. The Methodus ad Facilem Historiarum Cognitionem of Jean Bodin: A Critical Study. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1939.

Brundage, James. Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians, and Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.

Brunt, P.A. “Lex de Imperio Vespasiani.” Journal of Roman Studies 67 (1977): 95–116.

[Brutus, Stephanus Junius]. Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos. Edinburgh [Basel], 1579.

[Brutus, Stephanus Junius]. Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos. Ed. George Garnett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Bryant, Lawrence. “Making History: Ceremonial Texts, Royal Space, and Political Theory in the Sixteenth Century.”Changing Identities in Early Modern France. Ed. Michael Wolfe. Durham: Duke University Press, 1996.

Buchanan, George. A Dialogue on the Law of Kingship among the Scots. Trans. Roger Mason and Martin Smith. Burlington: Ashgate, 2004.

Buckland, W.W. The Roman Law of Slavery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1908.

(p.325) Buckland, W.W. A Textbook of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.

Buckle, Stephen. Natural Law and the Theory of Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.

Budé, Guillaume. Annotationes in Quatuor et Viginti Pandectarum Libros. Basel, 1557.

Burgess, Glenn. Absolute Monarchy and the Stuart Monarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.

Burgess, Glenn. “The Divine Right of Kings Reconsidered.” English Historical Review 107 (1992): 837–61.

Burgess, Glenn. The Politics of the Ancient Constitution: an Introduction to English Political Thought, 1600–1642. Houndsmills: Macmillan, 1992.

Burgess, Glenn. “Bodin in the English Revolution.” In The Reception of Bodin. Ed. Howell Lloyd. Leiden: Brill, 2013.

Burns, J.H. Lordship, Kingship and Empire: The Idea of Monarchy, 1400–1525. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Butler, Geoffrey. “Roman Law and the New Monarchy in France.” English Historical Review 35 (1920): 55–62.

Cabot, Vincent. Variarum Iuris Publici et Privati Disputationum Libri Duo in Novus Thesaurus Iuris Civilis et Canonici. Ed. G. Meerman. Vol. 4. The Hague, 1752.

Calasso, Francesco. I Glossatori e la Teoria della Sovranità. 2nd ed. Milan: Giuffrè, 1951.

Calasso, Francesco. I Glossatori e la Teoria della Sovranità. 3rd ed. Milan: Giuffrè, 1957.

Calasso, Francesco. “Iurisdictio nel Diritto Comune Classico.” Annali di Storia del Diritto 9 (1965): 89–110.

Calvin, John. “On Civil Government.” In Luther and Calvin: On Secular Authority. Ed. Harro Höpfl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Canning, J.P. “The Corporation in the Political Thought of the Italian Jurists of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries.” History of Political Thought 1 (1980): 9–32.

Canning, J.P. “Ideas of State in Thirteenth- and Fourteenth-Century Commentators on the Roman Law.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 33 (1983): 1–27.

Canning, J.P. Political Thought of Baldus de Ubaldis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Canning, J.P. “Law, Sovereignty and Corporation Theory, 1300–1450.” In Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought. Ed. J.H. Burns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Canning, J.P. A History of Medieval Political Thought. London: Routledge, 2005.

Canning, J.P. Ideas of Power in the Late Middle Ages, 1296–1417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Canovan, Margaret. The People. Cambridge: Polity, 2005.

Carlyle, R.W. and A.J. Carlyle. History of Mediaeval Political Theory in the West. 6 vols. London: Blackwood and Sons, 1903–38.

Cawdrey, Robert. The First English Dictionary, 1604: Robert Cawdrey’s A Table Alphabeticall. Oxford: Bodleian Library, 2007.

(p.326) Charles I. “The King’s Answer to the XIX Propositions, 18 June 1642.” In The Stuart Constitution, 1603–1688. 2nd ed. Ed. J.P. Kenyon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

Chemerinsky, Erwin. “In Defense of Judicial Review: The Perils of Popular Constitutionalism,” University of Illinois Law Review (2004): 673–90.

Chemnitz, Bogislus Philipp von [“Hippolytus a Lapide”]. Dissertatio de Ratione Status in Imperio Nostro Romano-Germanico. 1640.

Chrimes, S.B. “The Constitutional Ideas of Dr. John Cowell.” English Historical Review 64 (1949): 461–87.

Church, William Farr. Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth Century France: A Study in the Evolution of Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1941.

Cicero. Letters to Atticus. Trans. E.O. Winstedt New York: Macmillan, 1912.

Cicero. De Officiis. Loeb Classical Library. Trans. Walter Miller. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1913.

Cicero. De Re Publica, De Legibus. Loeb Classical Library. Trans. Clinton Walker Keyes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1928.

Clarke, John. “Extracts from the Debates at the General Council of the Army, Putney.” In The English Levellers. Ed. Andrew Sharp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Coffey, John. Politics, Religion and the British Revolutions: The Mind of Samuel Rutherford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Coing, Helmut. “Zur Eigentumslehre des Bartolus.” Zeitschrift für Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte 70 (1953): 349–71.

Coleman, Janet. “Medieval Discussions of Property: Ratio and Dominium according to John of Paris and Marsilius of Padua.” History of Political Thought 4 (1983): 209–28.

Coleman, Janet. “Dominium in Thirteenth and Fourteenth-Century Political Thought and Its Seventeenth-Century Heirs: John of Paris and Locke.” Political Studies 33 (1985): 73–100.

Coleman, Janet. “Property and Poverty.” In Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, c.350–c.1450. Ed. J.H. Burns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Coleman, Janet. “Using, Not Owning–Duties, Not Rights: The Consequences of Some Franciscan Perspectives on Politics.” In Defenders and Critics of Franciscan Life: Essays in Honor of John V. Fleming. Ed. Michael Cusato and G. Geltner. Leiden: Brill, 2009.

Collins, Amanda. Greater than Emperor: Cola di Rienzo and the World of Fourteenth-Century Rome. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.

Collins, Jeffrey. The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Colon-Rios, Joel. “The Legitimacy of the Juridical: Constituent Power, Democracy, and the Limits of Constitutional Reform.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 48 (2010): 199–245.

(p.327) Conring, Hermann. Hermann Conring’s New Discourse on the Roman-German Emperor. Ed. and trans. Constantin Fasolt. Tempe: Arizone Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2005.

Contarini, Gasparo. De Magistratibus et Republica Venetorum Libri V. Basel, 1547.

Coquillette, Daniel. The Civilian Writers of Doctors’ Commons, London: Three Centuries of Juristic Innovation in Comparative, Commercial and International Law. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt, 1988.

Cortese, Ennio. La Norma Giuridica. 2 Vols. Milan: Giuffrè, 1962.

Cortese, Ennio. Il Problema della Sovranità nel Pensiero Giuridico Medioevale. Rome, 1966.

Costa, Pietro. Iurisdictio: Semantica del Potere Politico nella Pubblistica Medievale, 1100–1433. Milan: Giuffrè, 1969.

Couzinet, Marie-Dominique. Histoire et Méthode a la Renaissance: Une Lecture de la Methodus de Jean Bodin. Paris: J.Vrin, 1996.

Cowell, John. The Interpreter, or, Booke Containing the Signification of Words. Cambridge, 1607.

Cowell, John. Institutiones Iuris Anglicani ad Methodum et Seriem Institutionum Imperialium Compositae et Digestae. Oxford, 1636.

Cromartie, Alan. The Constitutionalist Revolution: An Essay on the History of England, 1450–1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Crook, John Anthony. Law and Life of Rome. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967.

Cujas, Jacques. Observationes et Emendationes Libri XXIV. Köln, 1598.

Cujas, Jacques. Solemnes Notae. Frankfurt, 1598.

Curry, Steven. Indigenous Sovereignty and the Democratic Project. Burlington: Ashgate, 2004.

Curtis, Mark. Oxford and Cambridge in Transition, 1558–1642. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.

Cuttica, Cesare and Glenn Burgess. Eds. Monarchism and Absolutism in Early Modern Europe. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2011.

D’Addio, Mario. L’Idea del Contratto Sociale dai Sofisti all Riforma e il De Principatu di Mario Salamonio. Milan: Giuffrè, 1954.

Dahl, Robert. After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970.

Dahl, Robert. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.

Daly, John. “The Idea of Absolute Monarchy in Seventeenth Century England.” Historical Journal 21 (1978): 227–50.

Davis, Kathleen. Periodization and Sovereignty. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.

Dawson, John Philip. A History of Lay Judges. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.

De Maistre, Joseph. “Study on Sovereignty.” In The Generative Principle of Political Constitutions: Studies on Sovereignty, Religion, and Enlightenment. Ed. and trans. Jack Lively. Piscataway, Transaction Publishers, 2012.

(p.328) Dicey, Albert Venn. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1889.

Digges, Dudley. An Answer to a Printed Book. Oxford, 1642.

Digges, Dudley. A Review of the Observations Upon Some of His Majesties Late Answers and Expresses. Oxford, 1643.

Dobner, Petra and Martin Loughlin. Ed. The Twilight of Constitutionalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Donahue, Charles. “The Civil Law in England.” Yale Law Journal 84 (1974): 167–81.

Doneau, Hugues [Donellus]. Opera Omnia. 12 Vols. Rome: J. Salviucci, 1828.

Downing, Calibute. A Discourse of the State Ecclesiasticall of this Kingdome, in Relation to the Civill. Oxford, 1632.

Dreitzel, Horst. Protestantischer Aristotelismus und Absoluter Staat: Die ‘Politica’ des Henning Arnisaeus, ca. 1575–1636. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1970.

Du Fail, Noël. Oeuvres Facétieuses. 2 Vols. Paris: P. Daffis, 1874.

Duck, Arthur. De Usu et Authoritate Iuris Civilis Romanorum. London, 1653.

Duff, Patrick William. Personality in Roman Private Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938.

Duke, Alastair. Dissident Identities in the Early Modern Low Countries. Ed. Judith Pollmann and Andrew Spicer. Surrey: Ashgate, 2009.

Dumoulin, Charles. Omnia Quae Extant Opera. 5 Vols. Paris: Damian Foucault, 1681.

Durandus, Guilelmus. Speculum Iudiciale. Lyon, 1498–1500.

Dyzenhaus, David. “Constitutionalism in an Old Key: Legality and Constituent Power.” Global Constitutionalism 1 (2012): 229–60.

Edwards, Charles. Hugo Grotius, the Miracle of Holland. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1981.

Ehrenberg, Victor. “Imperium Maius in the Roman Republic.” American Journal of Philology 74 (1953): 113–36.

Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.

Eleftheriadis, Pavlos. “Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Constitution.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22 (2009): 1–24.

Eleftheriadis, Pavlos. “Law and Sovereignty.” Law and Philosophy 29 (2010): 535–69.

Elster, Jon. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Ely, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.

Engster, Daniel. “Jean Bodin, Skepticism and Absolute Sovereignty.” History of Political Thought 17 (1996): 469–99.

Esmein, Adhemar. “La maxime princeps legibus solutus est dans l’ancien droit public français.” In Essays in Legal History. Ed. Paul Vinogradoff. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1913.

Eulau, Heinz. “Theories of Federalism under the Holy Roman Empire.” American Political Science Review 35 (1941): 643–64.

(p.329) Fasolt, Constantin. “A Question of Right: Hermann Conring’s New Discourse on the Roman-German Emperor.” Sixteenth Century Journal 28 (1997): 739–58.

Fasolt, Constantin. The Limits of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.

Fay, Sidney Bradshaw. “The Roman Law and the German Peasant.” American Historical Review 16 (1911): 234–54.

Feenstra, Robert. Studies of Political Thought from Gerson to Grotius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1907.

Feenstra, Robert. “Jean de Blanot et la formule rex Franciae in regno suo princeps est.” In Études d’histoire du droit canonique dédiées à Gabrielle le Bras. Ed. Gabriel le Bras. 2 vols. Paris: Sirey, 1965.

Feenstra, Robert. “Les Origines du Dominium Utile Chez les Glossateurs.” In Fata Iuris Romani. Ed. Robert Feenstra. Leiden: Presse Universitaire de Leyde, 1974.

Feenstra, Robert. “Der Eigentumsbegriff bei Hugo Grotius im Licht Einiger Mittelalterlicher und Spätscholasticher Quellen.” In Festschrift für Franz Wiacker. Ed. Okko Behrends, et al. Göttingen, 1978.

Feenstra, Robert. “Dominium and Ius in Re Aliena: The Origins of a Civil Law Distinction.” In New Perspectives in the Roman Law of Property: Essays for Barry Nicholas. Ed. Peter Birks. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.

Felden, Johannes. Annotata in Hug. Grotium De Iure Belli ac Pacis. Amsterdam, 1653.

Figgis, John Neville. The Divine Right of Kings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1922.

Filmer, Robert. The Anarchy of a Limited or Mixed Monarchy. London, 1648.

Filmer, Robert. The Free-Holders Grant Inquest Touching Our Soveraigne Lord the King and His Parliament. London, 1648.

Filmer, Robert. Observations upon Aristotles Politiques Touching Forms of Government. London, 1652.

Filmer, Robert. Patriarcha, or the Natural Power of Kings. London: Walter Davis, 1680.

Filmer, Robert. The Anarchy of a Limited or Mixed Monarchy . In Patriarcha and Other Writings. Ed. Johann Sommerville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Filmer, Robert. The Free-Holders Grand Inquest . In Patriarcha and Other Writings. Ed. Johann Sommerville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Filmer, Robert. The Necessity of the Absolute Power of All Kings . In Patriarcha and Other Writings. Ed. Johann Sommerville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Filmer, Robert. Observations upon Aristotles Politiques . In Patriarcha and Other Writings. Ed. Johann Sommerville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Forsyth, Murray. “Thomas Hobbes and the Constituent Power of the People.” Political Studies 29 (1981): 191–203.

Fortescue, John. On the Laws and Governance of England. Ed. Shelley Lockwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Foxley, Rachel. The Levellers: Radical Political Thought in the English Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013.

Franklin, Julian. Ed. Jean Bodin and the Sixteenth Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.

(p.330) Franklin, Julian. Ed. Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century: Three Treatises by Hotman, Beza, and Mornay. New York: Pegasus, 1969.

Franklin, Julian. Ed. John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty: Mixed Monarchy and the Right of Resistance in the Political Thought of the English Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Franklin, Julian. Ed. “Sovereignty and the Mixed Constitution: Bodin and His Critics.” In Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700. Ed. J.H. Burns and Mark Goldie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Franklin, Julian. Ed. “Note on the Text.” In Jean Bodin: On Sovereignty. Ed. Julian Franklin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Freeden, Michael. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Freegard, William. Roman Law and Resistance Right: A Study of Question Three of the Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, 1971.

Friedrich, Carl Joachim. “Introduction.” In Political Methodice Digesta of Johannes Althusius. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1932.

Fritz, Christian. American Sovereigns: The People and America’s Constitutionalist Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Fukuda, Arihiro. Sovereignty and the Sword: Harrington, Hobbes, and Mixed Government in the English Civil Wars. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

Fulbecke, William. A Direction or Preparative to the Study of the Lawe. London, 1600.

Fulbecke, William. A Parallele or Conference of the Civill Law, the Canon Law, and the Common Law of This Realme of England. London: Thomas Wight, 1601.

Fulbecke, William. Pandectes of the Law of Nations. London, 1602.

Gallie, W.B. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1956): 167–98.

Garimberto, Girolamo. De Regimineti Publici de la Citta. Venice, 1544.

Garnett, George. “Law in the Vindiciae: A Vindication.” Historical Journal 49 (2006): 877–91.

Garnsey, Peter. Thinking About Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Gentili, Alberico. Regales Disputationes Tres. London, 1605.

Gibbon, Edward. The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Ed. J.B. Bury. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1898. [Reprinted 2013]

Gierke, Otto von. Political Theories of the Middle Ages. Trans. F.W. Maitland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900.

Gierke, Otto von. Das Deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht. 4 Vols. Berlin: Weidmann, 1913.

Gierke, Otto von. The Development of Political Theory. Trans. Bernard Freyd. New York: W.W. Norton, 1934.

Gierke, Otto von. Natural Law and the Theory of Society, 1500 to 1800. 2 Vols. Trans. Ernest Barker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.

Giesey, Ralph. The Juristic Basis of Dynastic Right to the French Throne. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1961.

(p.331) Giesey, Ralph. If Not, Not: The Oath of the Aragonese and the Legendary Laws of Sobrarbe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.

Giesey, Ralph. “The Monarchomach Triumvirs: Hotman, Beza and Mornay.” Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 29 (1970): 41–56.

Giesey, Ralph. “Medieval Jurisprudence in Bodin’s Concept of Sovereignty.” In Verhandlungen der Internationalen Bodin Tagung in München. Ed. Horst Denzer. München: Beck, 1973.

Gillet, Pierre. La Personnalité Juridique en Droit Eccléesiastique Spécialement chez les Décretaistes et les Décrétalistes et dans le Code du Droit Canonique. Malines, 1927.

Gilmore, Myron Piper. Argument from Roman Law in Political Thought, 1200–1600. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1942.

Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.

Goodin, Robert. “Enfranchsing All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (2007): 40–68.

Grafton, Anthony. Cartographies of Time. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2010.

Grassaille, Charles. Regalium Franciae. Paris, 1545.

Gratian. Decretum Gratiani. Lyon, 1545.

Green, Georgina. The Majesty of the People: Popular Sovereignty and the Role of the Writer in the 1790s. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Green, Jeffrey. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Greenberg, Janelle. The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St. Edward’s “Laws” in Early Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Grégoire, Pierre. De Republica Libri XXVI. Lyon: Ioannes Baptista Buysson, 1609.

Gregorovius, Ferdinand. History of the City of Rome in the Middle Ages. Trans. Annie Hamilton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1898. [Reprinted 2010]

Gregory IX. Decretales Gregorii Papae IX. Paris, 1601.

Grendler, Paul. “Printing and Censorship.” In Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Ed. C.B. Schmitt and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Griffiths, John. Statutes of the University of Oxford Codified in the Year 1636. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888.

Grotius, Hugo. De Ivre Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres. Paris: Nicolaus Buon, 1625.

Grotius, Hugo. Mare Liberum . In De Iure Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres. Frankfurt am Main, 1696.

Grotius, Hugo. Commentarius in Theses XI: An Early Treatise on Sovereignty, the Just War, and the Legitimacy of the Dutch Revolt. Ed. Peter Borschberg. New York: Peter Lang, 1994.

Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace. Ed. Richard Tuck. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005.

(p.332) Grotius, Hugo. Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty [De Iure Praedae]. Ed. Martine Julia van Ittersum. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006.

Haakonssen, Knud. “Hugo Grotius and the History of Political Thought.” Political Theory 13 (1985): 239–65.

Haakonssen, Knud. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Hamburger, Philip. Law and Judicial Duty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.

Hankins, James. “Exclusivist Republicanism and the Non-Monarchical Republic.” Political Theory 38 (2010): 452–84.

Harvey, Gabriel. Letter-Book of Gabriel Harvey, A.D. 1573-1580. Ed. Edward John Long Scott. Westminster: Nichols and Sons, 1884.

Hawkins, Darren, et al., ed. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Hayward, John. A Reporte of a Discovrse Concerning Svpreme Power in Affaires of Religion. London: Imprinted by F[elix] K[ingston] for Iohn Hardie, 1606.

Henshall, Nicholas. The Myth of Absolutism: Change and Continuity in Early Modern Monarchy. London: Longman, 1992.

Heuston, R.F.V. Essays in Constitutional Law. London: Stevens, 1961.

Hill, Christopher. “The Many-Headed Monster.” In Change and Continuity in Seventeenth-Century England. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.

Hill, Christopher. Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.

Hill, Christopher. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984.

Hobbes, Thomas. Elementa Philosophica de Cive. Amsterdam: Elzevir, 1647.

Hobbes, Thomas. De Corpore Politico: Or the Elements of Law, Moral & Politick. London: Printed for J. Martin and J. Ridley, 1650.

Hobbes, Thomas. On the Citizen. Ed. Richard Tuck and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. 3 Vols. Ed. Noel Malcolm. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2012.

Hochstrasser, T.J. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Hoekstra, Kinch. “The De Facto Turn in Hobbes’ Political Philosophy.” In Leviathan After 350 Years. Ed. Tom Sorell and Luc Foisneau. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Hoekstra, Kinch. “A Lion in the House: Hobbes and Democracy.” In Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Ed. Annabel Brett et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Hoekstra, Kinch. “Early Modern Absolutism and Constitutionalism.” Cardozo Law Review 34 (2013): 1079–98.

(p.333) Hoke, Rudolf. Die Reichsstaatsrechtslehre des Johannes Limnaeus: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Deutschen Staatsrechtswissenschaft im 17.Jahrhundert. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1968.

Holborn, Hajo. A History of Modern Germany. Vol. 1. The Reformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.

Holland, Ben. “The Moral Person of the State: Emer de Vattel and the Foundations of International Legal Order.” History of European Ideas 37 (2011): 438–45.

Holland, Ben. “Sovereignty as Dominium? Reconstructing the Constructivist Roman Law Thesis.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (2010): 449–80.

Holland, Ben. “Natural Law and the Theory of International Society: Otto von Gierke and the Three Traditions of International Theory.” Journal of International Political Theory 8 (2012): 48–73.

Holmes, Stephen. “Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy. Ed. Jon Elster and Rune Slagstad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1995.

Honig, Bonnie. Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.

Hont, Istvan. “Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: Contemporary Crisis of the Nation State in Historical Perspective.” Political Studies 42 (1994): 166–231.

Höpfl, Harro and Martyn Thompson. “The History of Contract as a Motif in Political Thought.” American Historical Review 84 (1979): 919–44.

Höpfl, Harro. Jesuit Political Thought: The Society of Jesus and the State, c.1540–1630. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Hotman, François. De Feudis Commentatio Tripertita. Lyon, 1573.

Hotman, François. Francogallia. Ed. Ralph Giesey. Trans. J.H.M. Salmon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.

Hueglin, Thomas. Early Modern Concepts for a Late Modern World: Althusius on Community and Federalism. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1999.

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. The Limits of State Action. Ed. J.W. Burrow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

Hunton, Philip. A Treatise of Monarchie. London: E. Smith, 1689.

Isernia, Andrea. In Usus Feudorum Commentaria. Naples, 1671.

Jackson, Richard. “Elective Kingship and Consensus Populi in Sixteenth Century France.” Journal of Modern History 44 (1972): 155–71.

Jolowicz, H.F. and Barry Nicholas. Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.

Johnston, David. “The General Influence of Roman Institutions of State and Public Law.” In The Civilian Tradition and Scots Law: Aberdeen Quincentenary Essays. Ed. D.L. Carey Miller and R. Zimmermann. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1997.

(p.334) Jordan, W.K. Men of Substance: A Study of the Thought of Two English Revolutionaries, Henry Parker and Henry Robinson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1942.

Judson, Margaret Atwood. Crisis of the Constitution: An Essay in Constitutional and Political Thought in England 1603–1645. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1949.

Judson, Margaret Atwood. “Henry Parker and the Theory of Parliamentary Sovereignty.” In Essays in Political Theory in Honor of Charles H. McIlwain. Ed. Carl Wittke. New York, 1967.

Kahl, Johann. Lexicon Iuridicum Iuris Caesarei Simul et Canonici. Genf, 1612.

Kalyvas, Andreas. “Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power.” Constellations 12 (2005): 223–44.

Kalyvas, Andreas. Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Kantorowicz, Ernst. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.

Kantorowicz, Hermann and W.W. Buckland. Ed. Studies in the Glossators of the Roman Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938.

Kaser, Max. Das Römische Zivilprozeßrecht. München: Beck, 1966.

Keene, Edward. Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Kelley, Donald. “De Origine Feudorum: The Beginnings of a Historical Problem.” Speculum 39 (1964): 207–28.

Kelley, Donald. Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: Language, Law, and History in the French Renaissance. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.

Kelley, Donald. “The Rise of Legal History in the Renaissance.” History and Theory 9 (1970): 174–94.

Kelley, Donald. “Development and Context of Bodin’s Method.” In Verhandlungen der Internationalen Bodin Tagung in München. Ed. Horst Denzer. München: C.H. Beck, 1973.

Kelley, Donald. François Hotman: A Revolutionary’s Ordeal. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.

Kelley, Donald. “Vera Philosophia: The Philosophical Significance of Renaissance Jurisprudence.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 267–79.

Kelley, Donald. “Civil Science in the Renaissance: Jurisprudence Italian Style.” Historical Journal 22 (1979): 777–94.

Kelley, Donald. “Civil Science in the Renaissance: Jurisprudence in the France Manner.” History of European Ideas 2 (1981): 261–76.

Kelley, Donald. The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.

Keohane, Robert, Stephen Macedo, Andrew Moravcsik. “Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism.” International Organization 63 (2009): 1–31.

Kern, Fritz. Kingship and Law in the Middle Ages. Trans. S.B. Chrimes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1939.

(p.335) King, Preston. The Ideology of Order: A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and Thomas Hobbes. London: Allen and Unwin, 1974.

Kingdon, Robert. Myths About the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacres, 1572–1576. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.

Kingsbury, Benedict and Benjamin Straumann, eds. The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Kirchner, Hermann. Respublica. Marburg, 1608.

Kirshner, Julius. “Civitas Sibi Faciat Civem: Bartolus of Sassoferrato’s Doctrine on the Making of a Citizen.” Speculum 48 (1973): 694–713.

Koch, Bettina. Zur Dis-Kontinuität Mittelalterlichen Politischen Denkens in der Neuzeitlichen Politischen Theorie: Marsilius von Padua, Johannes Althusius und Thomas Hobbes im Vergleich. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2005.

Kocher, Paul. “Francis Bacon and the Science of Jurisprudence.” Journal of the History of Ideas 18 (1957): 3–26.

Koeppler, H. “Frederick Barbarossa and the Schools of Bologna.” English Historical Review 54 (1939): 577–607.

Kramer, Kramer. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Krasner, Stephen. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.

Kratochwil, Friedrich. “Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry in the Formation of the State System.” World Politics 39 (1986): 27–52.

Kratochwil, Friedrich. “Sovereignty as Dominium: Is There a Right of Humanitarian Intervention?”Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention. Ed. Gene Lyons and Michael Mastanduno. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.

Krisch, Nico. Beyond Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

La Douaren, François [Duarenus]. Francisci Duareni Opera Omnia. 4 Vols. Lucca: typis J.Rochii, 1765.

Lahey, Stephen. Philosophy and Politics in the Thought of John Wyclif. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Laski, Harold. “Political Theory in the Later Middle Ages.” In Cambridge Medieval History. Ed. C.W. Previté-Orton and Z.N. Brooke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936.

Last, Hugh. “Imperium Maivs: A Note.” Journal of Roman Studies 37 (1947): 157–64.

Lauria, M. “Iurisdictio.” Studi Bonfante II. Milan, 1920.

Lawson, George. Politica Sacra et Civilis. Ed. Conal Condren. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Lee, Alexander. “Roman Law and Human Liberty: Marsilius of Padua on Property Rights.” Journal of the History of Ideas 70 (2009): 23–44.

(p.336) Lee, Daniel. “Hobbes and the Civil Law: The Use of Roman Law in Hobbes’s Civil Science.” In Hobbes and the Law. Ed. David Dyzenhaus and Thomas Poole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Lee, Daniel. “Office Is a Thing Borrowed: Jean Bodin on Offices and Seigneurial Government.” Political Theory 41 (2013): 409–41.

Lee, H.Y. Political Representation in the Later Middle Ages: Marsilius in Context. New York: Peter Lang, 2008.

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Caesarinus Fürstenerius: De Suprematu Principum Germaniae.” In Political Writings. Ed. Patrick Riley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Lesaffer, Randall. “Argument from Roman Law in Current International Law: Occupation and Acquisitive Prescription.” European Journal of International Law 16 (2005): 25–58.

Lévy, J.P. Histoire de la Proprieté. Paris, 1972.

Lewis, Ewarts. Medieval Political Ideas. New York: A.A. Knopf, 1954.

Limnaeus, Johannes. Ius Publicum Imperii Romano-Germanici. 2 Vols. Strasbourg: Paul Ledertz, 1629–32.

Limnaeus, Johannes. Capitulationes Imperatorum et Regum Romanogermanorum cum Annotamentis. Strasbourg, 1651.

Levack, Brian. Civil Lawyers in England, 1603–1641: A Political Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.

Livy. The History of Rome [Ab Urbe Condita]. Loeb Classical Library. Trans. B.O. Foster. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1919.

Lloyd, Howell. The State, France, and the Sixteenth Century. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1983.

Loader, W.R. “Pompey’s Command Under the Lex Gabinia.” The Classical Review 54 (1940): 134–36.

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Loewenstein, Karl. The Governance of Rome. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.

Lomonaco, Fabrizio. New Studies on Lex Regia: Right, Philology, and Fides Historica in Holland between the 17th and 18th Centuries. New York: Peter Lang, 2011.

Lovett, Frank. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Loughlin, Martin. “The Constitutional Thought of the Levellers.” Current Legal Problems 60 (2007): 1–39.

Loughlin, Martin. Foundations of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Loughlin, Martin. “What Is Constitutionalisation?” In The Twilight of Constitutionalism? Ed. Petra Dobner and Martin Loughlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Loughlin, Martin. “The Concept of Constituent Power,” European Journal of Political Theory 13 (2014): 218–37.

(p.337) Loughlin, Martin and Neil Walker. Ed. The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Loyseau, Charles. Cinq Livres du Droit du Offices. In Les Oeuvres de Maistre Charles Loyseau. Lyon, 1701.

Lucrezi, Francesco. Leges Super Principem. Naples: Jovene, 1982.

Lupel, Adam. Globalization and Popular Sovereignty: Democracy’s Transational Dilemma. Oxford: Routledge, 2009.

Lupia, Arthur. “Delegation of Power: Agency Theory.” International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences 5 (2001): 3375–77.

Luther, Martin. “On Secular Authority.” In Luther and Calvin on Secular Authority. Ed. Harro Höpfl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

MacMillan, Ken. Sovereignty and Possession in the New World: The Legal Foundations of Empire, 1576–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Maine, Henry Sumner. Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. London: John Murray, 1924.

Maiolo, Francesco. Medieval Sovereignty. Delft: Eburon, 2007.

Major, J. Russell. From Renaissance Monarchy to Absolute Monarchy: French Kings, Nobles and Estates. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.

Marshall, Geoffrey. Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Commonwealth. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.

Martel, James. “Can There Be Politics Without Sovereignty: Arendt, Derrida and the Question of Sovereign Inevitability.” Law, Culture, and the Humanities 6 (2010): 153–66.

Maxwell, John. Sacro-Sancta Regum Maiestas. Oxford, 1644.

McCormick, John. “Machiavellian Democracy: Controlling Elites with Ferocious Populism.” American Political Science Review 95 (2001): 297–313.

McCormick, John. Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

McCuaig, William. Carlo Sigonio: The Changing World of the Late Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.

McIlwain, Charles Howard. “Sovereignty.” In Constitutionalism and the Changing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939.

McIlwain, Charles Howard. Constitutionalism Ancient and Modern. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1947.

McLaren, Anne. “Rethinking Republicanism: Vindiciae, Contra Tyrannos in Context.” Historical Journal 49 (2006): 23–52.

McRae, Kenneth. “Ramist Tendencies in the Thought of Jean Bodin.” Journal of the History of Ideas 16 (1955): 306–23.

Mellet, Paul-Alexis. Les Traités Monarchomaques: Confusion des Temps, Résistance Armée et Monarchie Parfaite, 1560–1600. Geneva: Droz, 2007.

Mellor, Ronald. “Tacitus, Academic Politics, and Regicide in the Reign of Charles I: The Tragedy of Dr. Isaac Dorislaus.” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 11 (2004): 153–93.

(p.338) Mendle, Michael. Henry Parker and the English Civil War: The Political Thought of the Public’s “Privado. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Merbury, Charles. A Briefe Discourse of Royall Monarchie, as of the Best Common Weale. London, 1581.

Mesnard, Pierre. L’essor de la Philosophie Politique au XVIe Siècle. Paris: J. Vrin, 1951.

Metzger, Ernest. “An Outline of Roman Civil Procedure.” Roman Legal Tradition 9 (2013): 1–30.

Meynial, E. “Notes sur la Formation de la Théorie du Domaine Divise.” In Mélanges Fitting. Ed. Herman Fitting. 2 Vols. Montpellier: Société Anonyme de l’Imprimerie Générale du Midi, 1907–8.

Michaeud-Quantin, Pierre. Universitas: Expressions du Mouvement Communautaire dans le Moyen-âge Latin. Paris, 1970.

Michelman, Frank. “Constitutional Authorship by the People.” Notre Dame Law Review 74 (1999): 1605–30.

Millar, Fergus. The Roman Republic in Political Thought. Hanover: University Press of New England, 2002.

Miller, Joshua. “The Ghostly Body Politic: The Federalist Papers and Popular Sovereignty.” Political Theory 16 (1988): 99–119.

Milton, John. A Defence of the People of England [Pro Populo Anglicano]. In Political Writings. Ed Martin Dzelzainis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Milton, John. The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates . In Political Writings. Ed Martin Dzelzainis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Mommsen, Theodor. Römisches Staatsrecht. Vol. 2. 3rd ed. Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1887.

Monheit, Michael. “Guillaume Budé, Andrea Alciato, and Pierre de l’Estoile: Renaissance Interpreters of Roman Law.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1997): 21–40.

Moreau-Reibel, Jean. J. Bodin et le Droit Public Comparé dans ses Rapports avec la Philosophie de l’Histoire. Paris: Vrin, 1933.

Morgan, Edmund. Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America. New York: W.W. Norton, 1989.

Mosse, George. The Struggle for Sovereignty in England, from the Reign of Queen Elizabeth to the Petition of Right. East Lansing: Michigan State College Press, 1950.

Musto, Ronald. Apocalypse in Rome: Cola di Rienzo and the Politics of the New Age Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.

Najemy, John. A History of Florence, 1200–1575. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.

Näström, Sophia. “The Legitimacy of the People.” Political Theory 35 (2007): 624–58.

Nederman, Cary. The Lineages of European Political Thought. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2009.

Nellen, Henk. Hugo de Groot: Een Leven in Strijd om de Vrede, 1583–1645. Amsterdam: Balans Publishers, 2007.

Nelson, Eric. “Talmudical Commonwealthsmen and the Rise of Republican Exclusivism.” Historical Journal 50 (2007): 809–35.

Nelson, Eric. The Hebrew Republic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.

(p.339) Nootens, Geneviève. Popular Sovereignty in the West: Polities, Contention, and Ideas. London: Routledge, 2013.

Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.

Nyquist, Mary. Arbitrary Rule: Slavery, Tyranny and the Power of Life and Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.

Oakley, Francis. “On the Road from Constance to 1688: The Political Thought of John Major and George Buchanan.” Journal of British Studies 1 (1962): 1–31.

Oakley, Francis. The Political Thought of Pierre d’Ailly: The Voluntarist Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.

Oakley, Francis. “Jacobean Political Theology: The Absolute and Ordinary Powers of the King.” Journal of the History of Ideas 29 (1968): 323–46.

Ober, Josiah. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.

Ochoa Espejo, Paulina. Time of Popular Sovereignty: Process and the Democratic State. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2011.

Ochoa Espejo, Paulina. “People, Territory, and Legitimacy in Democratic States.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2014): 466–78.

O’Donnell, G.A. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5 (1994): 55–69.

Odofredus. Lectura Super Digesto Veteri. Lyon, 1550.

Odofredus. Lectura Super Codice. Lyon, 1552.

Otto, Daniel. “An Mixtus Detur Reipublicae Status?” In Arumäus, Dominicus. Discursus Academici de Iure Publico. 3 Vols. Jena, 1620.

Overton, Robert. “An Appeal from the Degenerate Representative Body, the Commons of England Assembled at Westminster, to the Body Represented, the Free People in General.” In Leveller Manifestoes of the Puritan Revolution. Ed. Don Wolfe. New York: T. Nelson and Sons, 1944.

Overton, Robert. “An Arrow Against All Tyrants and Tyranny.” In The English Levellers. Ed. Andrew Sharp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Overton, Robert and William Walwyn. “A Remonstrance of Many Thousand Citizens.” In The English Levellers. Ed. Andrew Sharp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Owen, David. “Constituting the Polity, Constituting the Demos.” Ethics and Global Politics 5 (2012): 129–52.

Parker, David. “Sovereignty, Absolutism and the Function of the Law in Seventeenth-Century France.” Past and Present 122 (1989): 36–74.

Parker, Henry. Observations Upon Some of His Majesties Late Answers and Expresses. London, 1642.

Parker, Henry. Ius Populi, or A Discourse Wherein Clear Satisfaction Is Given As Well Concerning the Right of Subjects As the Right of Princes. London, 1644.

Parrow, Kathleen. From Defense to Resistance: Justification of Violence During the French Wars of Religion. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1993.

Pauermeister, Tobias von. De Iurisdictione Imperii Romani. 1608.

(p.340) Pedersen, Olaf. The First Universities: Studium Generale and the Origins of University Education in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Pels, Dick. Property and Power in Social Theory. London: Routledge, 2002.

Penna, Lucas de. Lectura. Lyon, 1529.

Pennington, Kenneth. “Law, Legislative Authority, and Theories of Government, 1150-1300.” In Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought. Ed. J.H. Burns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Pennington, Kenneth. The Prince and the Law, 1200-1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

Pennington, Kenneth. “The Birth of the Ius Commune: King Roger II’s Legislation.” Rivista Internazionale de Diritto Commune 17 (2006): 1–40.

Pennington, Kenneth. “The Big Bang: Roman Law in the Early Twelfth Century.” Rivista Internazionale di Diritto Comune 18 (2007): 43–70.

Perrin, J.W. “Azo, Roman Law, and Sovereign European States.” Studia Gratiana 15 (1972): 89-101.

Pettegree, Andrew. Emden and the Dutch Revolt: Exile and the Development of Reformed Protestantism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Pettit, Philip. “Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma.” Philosophical Issues 11 (2001): 268–99.

Pettit, Philip. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Pettit, Philip. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Pocock, J.G.A. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.

Pocock, J.G.A. and Gordon Schochet. “Interregnum and Restoration.” In The Varieties of British Politicl Thought, 1500–1800. Ed. J.G.A. Pocock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Podoksik, Efraim. “One Concept of Liberty: Towards Writing the History of a Political Concept.” Journal of the History of Ideas 71 (2010): 219–40.

Ponte, Oldradus de. Consilia seu Responsa. Venice, 1585.

Post, Gaines. “A Romano-Canonical Maxim, Quod Omnes Tangit, in Bracton.” Traditio 4 (1946): 197–251.

Post, Gaines. Studies in Medieval Legal Thought: Public Law and the State, 1100–1322. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964.

Prynne, William. The Soveraigne Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes. London: Michael Sparke, Senior, 1643.

Pufendorf, Samuel. De Iure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934.

Pufendorf, Samuel. On the Present State of Germany. Ed. Michael Seidler. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2007.

(p.341) Putterman, Ethan. Rousseau, Law and the Sovereignty of the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Quaritsch, Helmut. Staat und Souveränität. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum, 1970.

Rabkin, Jeremy. Law Without Nations: Why Constitutional Government Requires Sovereign States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.

Radding, Charles and Antonio Ciaralli. The Corpus Iuris Civilis in the Middle Ages: Manuscripts and Transmission from the Sixth Century to the Juristic Revival. Leiden: Brill, 2007.

Raitiere, M.N. “Hubert Languet’s Authorship of the Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos.Il Pensiero Politico 13 (1981): 395–420.

Randall, Michael. The Gargantuan Polity: On the Individual and the Community in the French Renaissance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Reinkingk, Theodor Dietrich. Tractatus de Regimine Seculari et Ecclesiastico. Frankfurt am Main, 1659.

Révigny, Jacques de. Lectura Super Codice. Paris, 1519.

Riccobono, Salvator. “Mos Italicus e Mos Gallicus nella Interpretazione del Corpus Iuris Civilis.” In Acta Congressus Iuridici Internationalis VII Saeculo a Decretalibus Gregorii IX et XIV a Codice Iustiniano Promulgatis Romae. Ed. Pontificium Institutum Utriusque Iuris. Rome: Libraria Pontificii Instituti Utriusque Iuris, 1935.

Riccobono, Salvator. Fontes Iuris Romani Antejustiniani. 3 Vols. Florence: Barbera, 1941.

Richardson, John. “The Meaning of Imperium in the Last Century BC and the First AD.” In The Roman Law Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. Ed. Benedict Kingsbury and Benjamin Straumann. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Rienzo, Cola di. In The Revolution of Cola di Rienzo. Ed. Mario Emilio Cosenza, Ronald Musto, 3rd ed. New York: Italica Press, 1996.

Riesenberg, Peter. The Inalienability of Sovereignty in Medieval Political Thought. New York: Columbia University Press, 1955.

Rosate, Albericus de. Dictionarium Iuris tam Civili quam Canonici. Venice, 1572.

Rosate, Albericus de. Commentaria Super Digesto. Venice, 1585. [Reprinted Torino, 1974]

Rothbard, Murray. “Jean Bodin: Apex of Absolutist Thought in France.” An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought: Economic Thought Before Adam Smith. Vol. 1. Aldershot: E. Elgar, 1995.

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. Ed. Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Rowen, Herbert. The King’s State: Proprietary Dynasticism in Early Modern France. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1980.

Rubenfeld, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.

(p.342) Rubinstein, Nicolai. The Government of Florence under the Medici. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Rüfner, Thomas. “The Roman Concept of Ownership and the Medieval Doctrine of Dominium Utile.The Creation of the Ius Commune: From Casus to Regula. Ed. John Cairns and Paul Du Plessis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.

Ruggie, John Gerard. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47 (1993): 139–74.

Runciman, David. “What Kind of Person Is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Quentin Skinner.” Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2000): 268–78.

Runciman, David. Pluralism and the Personality of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Rushworth, John. Historical Collections of Private Passages of State. Vol. 1. London: Tho. Newcomb for George Thomason, 1659.

Rutherford, Samuel. Lex, Rex. London: Iohn Field, 1644.

Ryan, Magnus. “Bartolus of Sassoferrato and the Free Cities.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. Sixth Series 10 (2000): 65–89.

Ryan, Magnus. “Political Thought.” In Cambridge Companion to Roman Law. Ed. David Johnston. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Sabine, George. A History of Political Theory. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1937.

Salamonius, Mario. De Principatu Libri VI. Paris: Du Val, 1578.

Salmon, J.H.M. French Religious Wars in English Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.

Salmon, J.H.M. “An Alternative Theory of Popular Resistance: Buchanan, Rossaeus, and Locke.” In Renaissance and Revolt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Salmon, J.H.M. “Catholic Resistance Theory, Ultramontanism, and the Royalist Response, 1580-1620.” InCambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700. Ed. J.H. Burns and Mark Goldie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Salmon, J.H.M. “The Legacy of Jean Bodin: Absolutism, Populism, or Constitutionalism?” History of Political Thought 17 (1996): 500–22.

Savigny, Friedrich Karl von. Geschichte des Römisches Rechts im Mittelalter. Heidelberg: Mohr, 1834.

Schmitt, Carl. Dictatorship: From the Origin of the Modern Concept of Sovereignty to Proletarian Class Struggle. Trans. Michael Hoelzl and Graham Ward. Cambridge: Polity, 2014.

Schröder, Peter. “The Constitution of the Holy Roman Empire After 1648: Samuel Pufendorf’s Assessment in his Monzambano.” Historical Journal 42 (1999): 961–83.

Schulz, Fritz. “Bracton on Kingship.” English Historical Review 60 (1945): 136–76.

Searle, John. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

Searle, John. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press, 1995.

Selden, John. Ioannis Seldeni ad Fletam Dissertatio [Ad Fletam]. Ed. David Ogg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1925.

(p.343) Selden, John. Titles of Honour. 2nd Ed. London: Printed by William Stansby for Richard Whitakers, 1631.

Seneca. Moral Essays. Vol. 3. De Beneficiis. Loeb Classical Library. Trans. John Basore. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1935.

Sheehan, James. “The Problem of Sovereignty in European History.” American Historical Review 111 (2006): 1–15.

Sidney, Algernon. Discourses Concerning Government. Ed. Thomas West. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1990.

Sigonius, Carolus. De Republica Atheniensium Libri IV. Bologna, 1564.

Skinner, Quentin. Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Skinner, Quentin. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Skinner, Quentin. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Skinner, Quentin. “Classical Liberty and the Coming of the English Civil War.” In Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage. Vol. 2. Ed. Martin Van Gelderen and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Skinner, Quentin. “Classical Liberty, Renaissance Translation and the English Civil War.” In Visions of Politics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Skinner, Quentin. “From the State of Princes to the Person of the State.” In Vision of Politics. Vol. 2. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Skinner, Quentin. “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State.” In Visions of Politics. Vol. 3. Hobbes and Civil Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Skinner, Quentin. “Humanism, Scholasticism, and Popular Sovereignty.” In Visions of Politics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Skinner, Quentin. “John Milton and the Politics of Slavery.” In Visions of Politics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Skinner, Quentin. “The Rediscovery of Republican Values.” In Visions of Politics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Skinner, Quentin. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Skinner, Quentin. “A Genealogy of the Modern State.” Proceedings of the British Academy 162 (2009) 325–70.

Smith, C.J. The Roman Clan: The Gens from Ancient Ideology to Modern Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Smith, Nigel. Literature and Revolution in England, 1640–1660. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.

Smith, Rogers. Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Sommerville, Johann. “History and Theory: The Norman Conquest in Early Stuart Political Thought.” Political Studies 34 (1986): 249–61.

(p.344) Sommerville, Johann. “Absolutism and Royalism.” In Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700. Ed. J.H. Burns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Sommerville, Johann. Royalists and Patriots: Politics and Ideology in England, 1603-1640. 2nd ed. London: Longman, 1999.

Song, Sarah. “The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory: Why the Demos Should Be Bounded By the State.” International Theory 4 (2012): 39–68.

Squibb, G.D. Doctors’ Commons: A History of the College of Advocates and Doctors of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.

Staveley, E.S. “The Fasces and Imperium Maius.” Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 12 (1963): 458–84.

Stein, Peter. Roman Law in European History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Stobbe, Otto. Geschichte der Deutschen Rechtsquellen. 2 Vols. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1860–64.

Stolleis, Michael. Geschichte des Öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland. Vol. 1. Reichspublizistik und Policeywissenschaft, 1600–1800. München: C.H.Beck, 1988.

Stolleis, Michael, ed. Juristen: Ein Biographisches Lexikon von der Antike bis zum 20. Johrhundert. München: Beck, 1995.

Straumann, Benjamin. “Ancient Caesarian Lawyers in a State of Nature: Roman Tradition and Natural Rights in Hugo Grotius” De Iure Praedae.Political Theory 34 (2006): 328–50.

Straumann, Benjamin. Hugo Grotius und die Antike. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007.

Straumann, Benjamin. “Natural Rights and Roman Law in Hugo Grotius’ Theses LVI, De Jure Praedae and Defensio Capitis Quinti Maris Liberi.” In Property, Piracy and Punishment. Ed. Hans Blom. Leiden: Brill, 2009.

Straumann, Benjamin. “The Corpus Juris as a Source of Law between Sovereigns.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations. Ed. Benedict Kingsbury and Benjamin Straumann. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Straumann, Benjamin. Roman Law in the State of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Straumann, Benjamin. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Straumann, Benjamin. “The Roman Republic as a Constitutional Order from the Principate to the Renaissance,” In Republics and the Classical Past, 1500–1800. Ed. W. Velema and A. Westseijn Leiden: Brill, forthcoming.

Strauss, Gerald. Law, Resistance and the State: The Opposition to Roman Law in Reformation Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.

Strayer, John. On the Medieval Origins of the Modern State. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.

Stroumsa, Guy. A New Science: The Discovery of Religion in the Age of Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.

Suarez, Francisco. Tractatvs de Legibvs, ac Deo Legislatore. Lyon, 1613.

(p.345) Suksi, Markku. Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and the Practices of Referendum. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993.

Thireau, Jean-Louis. Charles Du Moulin, 1500–1566. Geneva: Droz, 1980.

Tierney, Brian. Foundations of the Conciliarist Theory: The Contribution of the Medieval Canonists from Gratian to the Great Schism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955.

Tierney, Brian. “Bracton on Government.” Speculum 38 (1963): 295–317.

Tierney, Brian. “The Prince Is Not Bound by the Laws: Accursius and the Origins of the Modern State.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 5 (1963): 378–400.

Tierney, Brian. Religion, Law, and the Growth of Constitutional Thought, 1150–1650, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

Tilly, Charles. “Reflections on the History of European Statemaking.” In Formation of National States in Western Europe. Ed. Charles Tilly. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.

Tuck, Richard. “Hobbes and Democracy.” In Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Ed. Annabel Brett et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Tuck, Richard. Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Tuck, Richard. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Tushnet, Mark. “Popular Constitutionalism as Political Law.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 81 (2006): 991–1006.

Ullmann, Walter. The Medieval Idea of Law as Represented by Lucas De Penna: A Study in Fourteenth-Century Legal Scholarship. London: Methuen, 1946.

Ullmann, Walter. “The Development of the Medieval Idea of Sovereignty.” English Historical Review 64 (1949): 1–33.

Ullmann, Walter. The Growth of Papal Government in the Middle Ages. London: Methuen, 1962.

Ullmann, Walter. “Juristic Obstacles to the Emergence of the Concept of the State in the Middle Ages.” Annali di Storia del Diritto – Rassegna Internazionale, XII–XIII (1968–9): 43–64.

Ullmann, Walter. Carolingian Renaissance and the Idea of Kingship. London: Methuen, 1969.

Ullmann, Walter. Law and Politics in the Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1975.

Vaccari, Pietro. “Utrum Iurisdictio Cohaeret Territorio: La Dottrina di Bartolo.”Bartolo da Sassoferrato. Milan, 1962.

Vallejo, Jesus. “Power Hierarchies in Medieval Juridical Thought: An Essay in Reinterpretation.” In Ius Commune: Zeitschrift für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte 19. Ed. Dieter Simon and Michael Stolleis. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1992.

(p.346) Van der Molen, Gezina. Alberico Gentili and the Development of International Law. Amsterdam: H.J. Paris, 1937.

Van Dijk, Conrad. John Gower and the Limits of the Law. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2013.

Van Gelderen, Martin. The Political Thought of the Dutch Revolt, 1550–1590. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Van Gelderen, Martin. “From Domingo de Soto to Hugo Grotius: Theories of Monarchy and Civil Power in Spanish and Dutch Political Thought, 1555–1609.” Pensiero Politico 32 (1999): 186–205.

Van Gelderen, Martin. “Aristotelians, Monarchomachs, and Republicans: Sovereignty and Respublica Mixta in Dutch and German Political Thought, 1580–1650.” In Republicanism: Republicanism and Constitutionalism in Early Modern Europe. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Veen, Theo. “Interpretations of Inst.1.2.6, D.1.4.1, and D.1.3.31: Huber’s Historical, Juridical and Political-Theoretical Reflections on the Lex Regia.” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 53 (1985): 357–77.

Verschoor, Marco. “The Democratic Boundary Problem and Social Contract Theory.” European Journal of Political Theory. Online version, 2015.

Vico, Giambattista. Universal Right. Trans. Pinton, Giorgio and Margaret Diehl. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2000.

Vinogradoff, Paul. Roman Law in Medieval Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1929.

Vinx, Lars. “Constitutional Indifferentism and Republican Freedom.” Political Theory 38 (2010): 809–37.

Vinx, Lars. “The Incoherence of Strong Popular Sovereignty.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 11 (2013): 101–24.

Viroli, Maurizio. From Politics to Reason of State: The Acquisition and Transformation of the Language of Politics, 1250–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Visser, Derek. “Junius: The Author of the Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos.” Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 84 (1971): 510–25.

Vitoria, Francisco de. “Relection on Civil Power” [De potestate civili]. In Political Writings. Ed. Anthony Pagden and Jeremy Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Waddington, A. “La France et les Protestants Allemands sous Charles IX et Henri III: Hubert Languet et Gaspard de Schomberg.” Révue Historique 42 (1890): 241–77.

Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Waldron, Jeremy. “Constitutionalism – A Skeptical View.” In Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Ed. Thomas Christiano and John Christman. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

Walker, Neil. Sovereignty in Transition. Oxford: Hart, 2003.

Walzer, Michael. Revolution of the Saints: A Study in the Origins of Radical Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.

Watson, Alan. “Roman Private Law and the Leges Regiae.” In Legal Origins and Legal Change. London: Hambledon Press, 1991.

(p.347) Weill, Georges. Les Théories sur le Pouvoir Royal en France Pendant les Guerres de Religion. New York: Burt Franklin, 1967.

Weinert, Matthew. Democratic Sovereignty: Authority, Legitimacy, and State in a Globalizing Age. New York: UCL Press, 2007.

Weston, Corinne Comstock. English Constitutional Theory and the House of Lords, 1556–1832. New York: Columbia University Press, 1965.

Weston, Corinne Comstock and Janelle Greenberg. Subjects and Sovereigns: The Grand Controversy over Legal Sovereignty in Stuart England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Wheeler, Harvey. “The Constitutional Ideas of Francis Bacon.” Political Research Quarterly 9 (1956): 927–36.

Whelan, Frederick. “Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem.” Nomos 25: Liberal Democracy. Ed. J. Roland Pennock and John Chapman. New York: New York University Press, 1983.

Whitman, James. The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.

Wieacker, Franz. A History of Private Law in Europe. Trans. Tony Weir. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.

Wijffels, Alain. “Le Disputazioni di Alberico Gentili sul Diritto Pubblico.” Alberico Gentili: La Salvaguardia Dei Beni Culturali Nel Diritto Internazionale. Milan: Giuffrè, 2008.

Wilentz, Sean. The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln. New York: W.W. Norton, 2006.

Wilks, Michael. The Problem of Sovereignty in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.

Wilson, Peter. “Still a Monstrosity? Some Reflections on Early Modern German Statehood.” Historical Journal 49 (2006): 565–76.

Woolf, C.N.S. Bartolus of Sassoferrato: His Position in the History of Medieval Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913.

Wootton, David. “Leveller Democracy and the Puritan Revolution.” In Cambridge History of Political Thought. Ed. J.H. Burns and Mark Goldie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Wormuth, Francis. Origins of Modern Constitutionalism. New York: Harper, 1949.

Zaller, Robert. “Henry Parker and the Regiment of True Government.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 135 (1991): 255–85.

Zimmermann, Reinhard. “Foreword” to Franz Wieacker, A History of Private Law in Europe. Trans. Tony Weir. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.

Zimmermann, Reinhard. The Law of Obligations: The Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.

Zmora, Hillary. State and Nobility in Early Modern Germany: The Knightly Feud in Franconia, 1440–1567. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Zouch, Richard. Elementa Iurisprudentiae Definitionibus. Oxford: Lichfield, 1636.