Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Representation and Reality in Wittgenstein's Tractatus$

José L. Zalabardo

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780198743941

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: August 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743941.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 23 November 2017

(p.255) References

(p.255) References

Source:
Representation and Reality in Wittgenstein's Tractatus
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Allaire, Edwin. 1966. “The Tractatus: Nominalistic or Realistic?”. In I. M. Copi and R. W. Beard (eds), Essays on Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 325–41.

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1971. An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. 2nd edn. London: Hutchinson.

Armstrong, David M. 1986. “The Nature of Possibility”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16: 577–94.

Armstrong, David M. 1989. A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bacon, John. 1995. Universals and Property Instances: The Alphabet of Being. Oxford: Blackwell.

Benacerraf, Paul. 1965. “What Numbers Could Not Be”. Philosophical Review, 74(1): 47–73.

Black, Max. 1964. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Blackwell, Kenneth, and Elizabeth Ramsden Eames. 1975. “Russell’s Unpublished Book on Theory of Knowledge”. Russell, 19: 3–14.

Bradley, Francis Herbert. 1893. Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay. London: Swan Sonneschein & Co.

Bronzo, Silver. 2011. “Context, Compositionality, and Nonsense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In R. Read and M. A. Lavery (eds), Beyond the Tractatus Wars. Routledge: New York, 84–111.

Campbell, Keith. 1990. Abstract Particulars. Oxford: Blackwell.

Candlish, Stewart. 1996. “The Unity of the Proposition and Russell’s Theories of Judgment”. In R. Monk and A. Palmer (eds), Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 103–35.

Cerezo, María. 2005. The Possibility of Language: Internal Tensions in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.

Collins, John. 2011. The Unity of Linguistic Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Conant, James. 2000. “Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein”. In A. Crary and R. Read (eds), The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, 174–217.

Conant, James. 2002. “The Method of the Tractatus”. In E. H. Reck (ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 374–462.

Copi, Irving M. 1958. “Objects, Properties and Relations in the Tractatus”. Mind, 67: 145–65.

Davidson, Donald. 2005. Truth and Predication. Cambridge, Mass., and London: Belknap.

Demopoulos, William, and Peter Clark. 2005. “The Logicism of Frege, Dedekind and Russell”. In S. Shapiro (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129–65.

(p.256) Diamond, Cora. 1991. “Throwing Away the Ladder: How to Read the Tractatus”. In The Realistic Spirit. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 179–204.

Diamond, Cora. 2000. “Ethics, Imagination and the Method of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In A. Crary and R. Read (eds), The New Wittgenstein. Abingdon: Routledge, 149–73.

Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.

Dummett, Michael. 1981. The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. London: Duckworth.

Fine, Kit. 2000. “Neutral Relations”. Philosophical Review, 109(1): 1–33.

Fogelin, Robert J. 1976. Wittgenstein. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Fogelin, Robert J. 1987. Wittgenstein. 2nd edn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Original edition, 1976.

Frege, Gottlob. 1960. “On the Foundations of Geometry”. Philosophical Review, 69: 3–17.

Frege, Gottlob. 1967. “Letter to Russell”. In J. van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 126–8.

Frege, Gottlob. 1979a. “Boole’s Logical Calculus and the Concept-Script”. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, and F. Kaulbach (eds), Posthumous Writings. Oxford: Blackwell, 9–46.

Frege, Gottlob. 1979b. “Notes for Ludwig Darmstaedter”. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, and F. Kaulbach (eds), Posthumous Writings. Oxford: Blackwell, 253–7.

Frege, Gottlob. 1980a. The Foundations of Arithmetic. Tr. J. L. Austin. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

Frege, Gottlob. 1980b. “Function and Concept”. In M. Black and P. T. Geach (eds), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 21–41. Original edn, “Funktion und Begriff” (1891).

Frege, Gottlob. 1980c. “On Concept and Object”. In M. Black and P. T. Geach (eds), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 42–55. Original edn, “Über Begriff und Gegenstand” (1892).

Frege, Gottlob. 1980d. Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Oxford: Blackwell.

Gaskin, Richard. 2009. The Unity of the Proposition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Geach, Peter T. 1957. Mental Acts. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Geach, Peter T. 1981. “Wittgenstein’s Operator N”. Analysis, 41: 168–71.

Glock, Hans-Johann. 2004. “All Kinds of Nonsense”. In E. Ammereller and E. Fisher (eds), Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge, 221–45.

Goldfarb, Warren. 1997. “Metaphysics and Nonsense: On Cora Diamond’s The Realistic Spirit”. Journal of Philosophical Research, 22: 57–74.

Griffin, James. 1964. Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Griffin, Nicholas. 1985. “Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement”. Philosophical Studies, 47: 213–48.

Griffin, Nicholas, ed. 1992. The Selected Letters of Bertrand Russell, i. The Private Years (1884–1914). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

Hacker, P. M. S. 1986. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Rev. edn. Oxford: Clarendon.

Hanks, Peter. 2007. “How Wittgenstein Defeated Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment”. Synthese, 154: 121–46.

(p.257) Hellman, Geoffrey. 1989. Mathematics without Numbers: Towards a Modal-Structural Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hochberg, Herbert. 1984. Logic, Ontology and Language: Essays on Truth and Reality. Munich: Philosophia.

Hochberg, Herbert. 2000. “Propositions, Truth and Belief: The Wittgenstein-Russell Dispute”. Theoria, 66: 3–40.

Hylton, Peter. 1990. Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon.

Hylton, Peter. 2005. “Functions, Operations, and Sense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In Propositions, Functions, and Analysis: Selected Essays on Russell’s Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 138–52.

Ishiguro, Hidé. 1969. “Use and Reference of Names”. In P. G. Winch (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 20–50.

Ishiguro, Hidé. 1981. “Wittgenstein and the Theory of Types”. In I. Block (ed.), Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 43–59.

Ishiguro, Hidé. 2001. “The So-Called Picture Theory: Language and the World in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus”. In H.-J. Glock (ed.), Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Malden, Mass., and Oxford: Blackwell, 26–46.

Johnston, Colin. 2007. “The Unity of a Tractarian Fact”. Synthese, 156: 231–51.

Johnston, Colin. 2009. “Tractarian Objects and Logical Categories”. Synthese, 167: 145–61.

Johnston, Colin. 2012. “Russell, Wittgenstein and Synthesis in Thought”. In J. L. Zalabardo (ed.), Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15–36.

Kang, Jinho. 2005. “On the Composition of the Prototractatus”. Philosophical Quarterly, 55: 1–20.

Kannisto, Heikki. 1986. Thoughts and their Subject: A Study of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Helsinki: Philosophical Society of Finland.

Kenny, Anthony. 1973. Wittgenstein. London: Allen Lane.

King, Jeffrey. 2009. “Questions of Unity”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 109: 257–77.

Kremer, Michael. 1997. “Contextualism and Holism in the Early Wittgenstein: From Prototractatus to Tractatus”. Philosophical Topics, 25: 87–120.

Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kripke, Saul. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Oxford: Blackwell.

Landini, Gregory. 1991. “A New Interpretation of Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement”. History and Philosophy of Logic, 12: 37–69.

Landini, Gregory. 2007. Wittgenstein’s Apprenticeship with Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Linsky, Leonard. 1992. “The Unity of the Proposition”. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 30: 243–73.

Long, Peter. 1969. “Are Predicates and Relational Expressions Incomplete?” Philosophical Review, 78: 90–8.

MacBride, Fraser. 2013. “The Russell-Wittgenstein Dispute: A New Perspective”. In M. Textor (ed.), Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 206–41.

McCarty, David. 1991. “The Philosophy of Logical Wholism”. Synthese, 87: 51–123.

McDowell, John. 1984. “Wittgenstein on Following a Rule”. Synthese, 58: 325–63.

(p.258) McGinn, Marie. 2006. Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Language and Logic. Oxford: Clarendon.

McGuinness, Brian. 1981. “The So-Called Realism of the Tractatus”. In I. Block (ed.), Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 60–73.

McGuinness, Brian. 1989. “Wittgenstein’s Pre-Tractatus Manuscripts”. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 33: 35–47.

McGuinness, Brian. 2002. “Pictures and Form”. In Approaches to Wittgenstein: Collected Papers. London: Routledge, 61–81. Original edn, 1956.

McGuinness, Brian. 2005. Young Ludwig: Wittgenstein’s Life, 1889–1921. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Original edition, 1988.

McGuinness, Brian, ed. 2008. Wittgenstein in Cambridge. Letters and Documents 1911–1951. Oxford: Blackwell.

Martin, C. B. 1980. “Substance Substantiated”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 58: 3–10.

Monk, Ray. 1991. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. London: Vintage.

Moore, G. E. 1919–20. “External and Internal Relations”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 20: 40–62.

Morris, Michael. 2008. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Wittgenstein and the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge.

Mounce, H. O. 1981. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Palmer, Anthony. 1988. Concept and Object: The Unity of the Proposition in Logic and Psychology. London: Routledge.

Pears, David. 1967. Bertrand Russell and the British Tradition in Philosophy. London: Fontana.

Pears, David. 1977. “The Relation between Wittgenstein’s Picture Theory of Propositions and Russell’s Theories of Judgment”. Philosophical Review, 86: 177–96.

Pears, David. 1987. The False Prison: A Study of the Development of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Pincock, Christopher. 2008. “Russell’s Last (and Best) Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgement”. Mind, 117: 107–40.

Potter, Michael. 2000. Reason’s Nearest Kin: Philosophies of Arithmetic from Kant to Carnap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Potter, Michael. 2009. Wittgenstein’s Notes on Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Proops, Ian. 2004. “Wittgenstein on the Substance of the World”. European Journal of Philosophy, 12: 106–26.

Ramsey, Frank. 1927. “Facts and Propositions”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 7: 153–70.

Ramsey, Frank. 1990. “Universals”. In Philosophical Papers, ed. D. H. Mellor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 8–33.

Resnik, Michael D. 1967. “The Context Principle in Frege’s Philosophy”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 27: 356–65.

Resnik, Michael D. 1997. Mathematics as a Science of Patterns: New York: Oxford University Press.

Ricketts, Thomas. 2010. “Concepts, Objects and the Context Principle”. In M. Potter and T. Ricketts (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Frege. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–219.

(p.259) Rodríguez Consuegra, Francisco. 2002. “Wittgenstein y la teoría russelliana de la proposición”. In Estudios de filosofía del lenguaje. Granada: Comares, 179–214.

Ruffino, Marco Antonio. 1994. “The Context Principle and Wittgenstein’s Criticism of Russell’s Theory of Types”. Synthese, 98: 401–14.

Russell, Bertrand. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Russell, Bertrand. 1904. “Meinong’s Theory of Complexes and Assumptions”. Mind, 13: 204–19, 336–54, 509–24.

Russell, Bertrand. 1907. “On the Nature of Truth”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 7: 28–49.

Russell, Bertrand. 1910a. “Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11: 108–28.

Russell, Bertrand. 1910b. “On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood”. In Philosophical Essays. London: Longmans, Green, 147–59.

Russell, Bertrand. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams & Norgate.

Russell, Bertrand. 1917. “Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description”. In Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays. London: George Allen & Unwin, 209–32.

Russell, Bertrand. 1919. “On Propositions: What they are and How they Mean”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 2: 1–43.

Russell, Bertrand. 1967. “Letter to Frege”. In J. van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 124–5.

Russell, Bertrand. 1975. The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell. London: Unwin.

Russell, Bertrand. 1984. “Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript”. In The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vii, ed. E. R. Eames and K. Blackwell. London: Allen & Unwin.

Russell, Bertrand. 1985. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court.

Russell, Bertrand. 1989. “The Classification of Relations”. In The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, ii. Philosophical Papers, 1896–1899, ed. N. Griffin and A. Lewis. London: Routledge, 138–46.

Russell, Bertrand. 1992. “What is Logic?”. In The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vi. Logical and Philosophical Papers, 1909–1913, ed. J. G. Slater. London: Routledge, 54–6.

Shapiro, Stewart. 1997. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Skyrms, Brian. 1981. “Tractarian Nominalism (For Wilfrid Sellars)”. Philosophical Studies, 40: 199–206.

Sluga, Hans. 1975. “Frege and the Rise of Analytic Philosophy”. Inquiry, 18: 471–98.

Sluga, Hans. 1987. “Frege Against the Booleans”. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 28: 80–98.

Soames, Scott. 1983. “Generality, Truth Functions, and Expressive Capacity in the Tractatus”. Philosophical Review, 92(4): 573–89.

Soames, Scott. 2003. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, i. The Dawn of Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sommerville, Stephen. 1980. “Wittgenstein to Russell (July, 1913). ‘I am very sorry to hear . . . my objection paralyses you’ ”. In R. Haller and W. Grassl (eds), Language, Logic, (p.260) and Philosophy: Proceedings of the 4th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, 182–7.

Stenius, Erik. 1960. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: A Critical Exposition of its Main Lines of Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Stenius, Erik. 1976. “The Sentence as a Function of its Constituents in Frege and in the Tractatus”. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 28: 71–84.

Stevens, Graham. 2005. The Russellian Origins of Analytical Philosophy: Bertrand Russell and the Unity of the Proposition. London and New York: Routledge.

Stout, G. F. 1911. “The Object of Thought and Real Being”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11: 187–208.

Sullivan, Peter M. 2005. “What is Squiggle? Ramsey on Wittgenstein’s Theory of Judgement”. In H. Lillehammer and D. H. Mellor (eds), Ramsey’s Legacy. Oxford: Clarendon, 52–69.

Waismann, Friedrich. 1979. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle. Oxford: Blackwell.

Whitehead, Alfred North, and Bertrand Russell. 1910. Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, Donald C. 1953. “On the Elements of Being”. Review of Metaphysics, 7: 3–18, 171–92.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Tr. C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1929. “Some Remarks on Logical Form”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 9: 162–71.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1971. Prototractatus: An Early Version of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Tr. D. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1973. Letters to C. K. Ogden with Comments on the English Translation of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1974a. Philosophical Grammar. Tr. A. Kenny. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1974b. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Tr. D. F. Pears and B. McGuinness. 2nd edn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Original edition, 1961.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1975. Philosophical Remarks. Tr. R. Hargreaves and R. White. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1978. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Tr. G. E. M. Anscombe. 3rd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1979. Notebooks, 1914–1916. Tr. G. E. M. Anscombe. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell. Original edition, 1961.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Philosophical Investigations. Tr. G. E. M. Anscombe. 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.

Zalabardo, José L. 2000. Introduction to the Theory of Logic. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

Zalabardo, José L. 2003. “Wittgenstein on Accord”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 84: 311–29.

Zalabardo, José L. 2010. “The Tractatus on Logical Consequence”. European Journal of Philosophy, 18: 425–42.

Zalabardo, José L. 2012. “Reference, Simplicity and Necessary Existence in the Tractatus”. In Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy, ed. J. L. Zalabardo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119–50.