Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy, Volume 3$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Robert Pasnau

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780198743798

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: August 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743798.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 September 2018

Mind the Gap?

Mind the Gap?

The Principle of Non-Repeatability and Aquinas’s Account of the Resurrection

Chapter:
(p.99) Mind the Gap?
Source:
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy, Volume 3
Author(s):

Adam Wood

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743798.003.0004

Most contemporary interpreters of Aquinas have assumed that Thomas subscribed to a “non-repeatability principle” such that created entities, once destroyed entirely, cannot be “brought back" into existence, even by God's power. Souls persisting in the interim between death and resurrection thus play an essential identity-preserving role between our death and rising again. No separated souls, no resurrection. Two of Aquinas’s best medieval interpreters, however, reject this interpretation. Leaning largely on one of Aquinas’s late quodlibetal questions, they deny that Thomas held any non-repeatability principle strong enough to bar God’s resurrecting us even from complete destruction, souls and all. Here the chapter argues that careful analysis of the quodlibet and other texts largely vindicates the contemporary interpretation. It does so in a surprising way, however, since it turns out Aquinas’s non-repeatability principle applies only to corruptible, material entities like us, and not to incorruptible entities like angels. The reason Aquinas held this view, the chapter argues, is rooted in his theory of individuation.

Keywords:   Aquinas, resurrection, personal identity, individuation, souls

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .