Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Practising VirtueInside International Arbitration$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David D. Caron, Stephan W. Schill, Abby Cohen Smutny, and Epaminontas E. Triantafilou

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780198739807

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739807.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 April 2019

Conceptions of Legitimacy of International Arbitration

Conceptions of Legitimacy of International Arbitration

Chapter:
(p.106) 6 Conceptions of Legitimacy of International Arbitration
Source:
Practising Virtue
Author(s):

Stephan W Schill

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739807.003.0007

This chapter analyses how the concept of legitimacy is used inside and outside the international arbitration community. It first focuses on why the legitimacy discourse has emerged outside international arbitration and which argumentative framework it adopted. This is closely connected to the transformation of international arbitration into a mechanism of transnational governance. At the same time, the conception of legitimacy used in system-internal discourse does not sufficiently reflect the governance function of international arbitration, but is narrowly tailored towards the function international arbitration performs for the disputing parties. In order to remedy this shortcoming, a multidimensional concept of legitimacy that encompasses not only ‘party legitimacy’, but also ‘community legitimacy’, ‘national legitimacy’, and ‘global legitimacy’, should be adopted. Finally, the chapter briefly addresses which sources the system-internal discourse could turn to for inspiration in developing a broader and more encompassing perspective on legitimacy.

Keywords:   legitimacy, international arbitration, transnational governance, system-internal discourse

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .