Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Interaction of Focus, Givenness, and ProsodyA Study of Italian Clause Structure$

Vieri Samek-Lodovici

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780198737926

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198737926.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 November 2017

(p.314) References

(p.314) References

Source:
The Interaction of Focus, Givenness, and Prosody
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Abels, Klaus (2003). ‘Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding’, PhD Dissertation, University of Connecticut. <http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI3104085>.

Abels, Klaus (2012). ‘The Italian Left Periphery: A View from Locality’, Linguistic Inquiry 43(2): 229–54.

Abels, Klaus & Ad Neeleman (2006). ‘Universal 20 without the LCA’, ms University College London. <http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/ad/publications/1.b.pdf> (1 January, 2009).

Aboh Enoch, Norbert Corver, Marina Dyakonova, & Marjo van Koppen (2010). ‘DP-internal information structure: Some introductory remarks’, Lingua 120 (2010): 782–801.

Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman (2002). ‘Effects of Short Term Storage in Processing Rightward Movement’, in Sieb Nooteboom, Fred Weerman, & Frank Wijnen (eds.), Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 219–56.

Acquaviva, Paolo (1999). ‘Negation and operator dependencies: Evidence from Italian’, Lingua 108: 137–74.

Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Agnanostopoulou (1998). ‘Parametrizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539.

Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou (1999). ‘EPP without Spec, IP’, in David Adger, Susan Pintzuk, Bernadette Plunkett, & George Tsoulas (eds.), Specifiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93–109.

Anagnostopoulou, Elena (1997). ‘Clitic left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation’, in Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.), Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 151–92.

Anagnostopoulou, Elena (1999). ‘Conditions on clitic doubling in Greek’, in Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 761–98.

Antinucci, Francesco & Guglielmo Cinque (1977). ‘Sull’ordine delle parole in italiano: l’emarginazione’, Studi di grammatica italiana (6): 121–46.

Anttila, Arto, Matthew Adams, & Michael Speriosu (2010). ‘The role of prosody in the English dative alternation’, Language and Cognitive Processes 25(7–9): 946–81.

Baković, Eric (2010). ‘Complementizers, Faithfulness, and Optionality’, ReVEL. Special edition 4: 248–60.

Barbosa, Maria do Pilar Pereira (1995). ‘Null Subjects’, PhD dissertation, MIT.

Barlow, Michael (1992). A Situated Theory of Agreement. London: Garland.

Beghelli, Filippo (1993). ‘A Minimalist approach to quantifier scope’, in Amy Schafer (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 23. Amherst, MA: GLSA, 65–80.

Beghelli, Filippo & Timothy Stowell (1997). ‘Distributivity and negation: the syntax of each and every’, in Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 71–109.

Belletti, Adriana (1990). Generalized Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.

Belletti, Adriana (1999). ‘Italian/Romance clitics: Structure and derivation’, in Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 543–79.

(p.315) Belletti, Adriana (2001). ‘“Inversion” as focalization’, in Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar. (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 60–90.

Belletti, Adriana (2004). ‘Aspects of the Low IP Area’, in Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2 (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 16–51.

Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi (1981). ‘The syntax of ne: some theoretical implications’, The Linguistic Review 1: 117–54.

Belletti, Adriana & Ur Shlosnky (1995). ‘The Order of Verbal Complements: A comparative Study’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13(3): 489–520.

Belloro, Valeria (2007). ‘Spanish Clitic Doubling: A Study of the Syntax–Pragmatics Interface’, PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.

Benincà, Paola (1988). ‘L’ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate’, in Lorenzo Renzi (ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. I. Bologna: Il Mulino, 115–225.

Benincà, Paola (2001). ‘The Position of Topic and Focus in the Left Periphery’, in Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 39–64.

Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto (2004). ‘Topic, Focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers’, in Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of IP and CP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52–75.

Bianchi, Valentina (2012). ‘On “focus movement” in Italian’. <http://www.ciscl.unisi.it/doc/doc_pub/bianchi_focusmvt.pdf> (23 November, 2012).

Bianchi, Valentina & Giuliano Bocci (2012). ‘Should I stay or should I go? Optional focus movement in Italian’, in Christopher Piñón (ed.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9: 1–18. <http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/cssp2011/abstracts/cssp2011BianchiBocci.pdf>.

Bocci, Giuliano (2008). ‘On the Syntax–Prosody Interface: An analysis of the prosodic properties of postfocal material in Italian and its implications’, Nanzan Linguistics 5: 13–42.

Bocci, Giuliano (2013). The Syntax–Prosody Interface: A cartographic perspective with evidence from Italian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bocci, Giuliano & Cinzia Avesani (2005). ‘Focus Contrastivo nella Periferia Sinistra della Frase: un Solo Accento, Ma Non Solo un Accento’, in Renata Savy & Claudia Crocco (eds.), Analisi Prosodica: Teorie, Modelli, e Sistemi di Annotazione. Rimini: EDK Editore, 111–41.

Bocci, Giuliano & Cinzia Avesani (2008). ‘Deaccent Given or Define Focus? Where Italian Doesn’t Sound Like English’, paper presented at the XXXIV Incontro di Grammatica Generativa. University of Padua.

Bocci, Giuliano & Cinzia Avesani (2011). ‘Phrasal prominencies do not need pitch movements: postfocal phrasal heads in Italian, Interspeech-2011: 1357–60.

Bonet, Eulalia (1990). Subjects in Catalan. (MITWPL). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bouma, Gerlof & Helen de Hoop (2008). ‘Unscrambled Pronouns in Dutch’, Linguistic Inquiry 39(4): 669–77.

Brandi, Luciana & Patrizia Cordin (1989). ‘Two Italian Dialects and the Null Subject Parameter’, in Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth Safir (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter. Boston: Kluwer, 111–42.

(p.316) Brasoveanu, Adrian & Alan Prince (2009). Ranking and Necessity. Rutgers Optimality Archives.

Brunetti, Lisa (2003). ‘Is there a Difference between Contrastive Focus and Information Focus?’, in Matthias Weisgerber (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference “Sub 7—Sinn und Bedeutung”, vol. Arbeitspapier 114. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, 53–69.

Brunetti, Lisa (2004). A Unification of Focus. Padova: Unipress.

Brunetti, Lisa (2009). ‘On links and tails in Italian’, Lingua 119: 756–81.

Büring, Daniel (1997). The Meaning of Topic and Focus. London: Routledge.

Büring, Daniel (2001). ‘Let’s Phrase It! Focus, Word Order, and Prosodic Phrasing in German’, in Gereon Müller & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Competition in syntax. Berlin/NewYork: Walter de Gruyter, 69–105.

Büring, Daniel (2002). ‘What Do Definites Do that Indefinites Definitely Don’t?’, in Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Audiator Vox Sapientiae—A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, vol. 52. (Studia Grammatica). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 70–100.

Büring, Daniel (2006). ‘Focus Projection and Default Prominence’, in Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The Architecture of Focus, vol. 82. (Studies in Generative Grammar). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 321–46.

Büring, Daniel (2007). ‘Semantics, Intonation, and Information Structure’, in Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 445–74.

Büring, Daniel & Rodrígo Gutiérrez-Bravo (2002). ‘Focus-related word order variation without the NSR. A prosody-based crosslinguistic analysis’, in Séamas Mac Bloscaidh (ed.), Syntax at Santa Cruz 3. Santa Cruz: ICSC, 41–58.

Büring, Daniel & Katharina Hartmann (1997). ‘Doing the right thing’, The Linguistic Review 14(1): 1–42.

Burzio, Luigi (1986). Italian Syntax. A Government Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Calabrese, Andrea (1982). ‘Alcune ipotesi sulla struttura informazionale della frase in italiano e sul suo rapporto con la struttura fonologica’, Rivista di grammatica generative (7): 3–78.

Calabrese, Andrea (1986). Pronomina—Some properties of the Italian pronominal system. (MITWPL). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Calabrese, Andrea (1988). ‘I pronomi clitici’, in Lorenzo Renzi (ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. I. Bologna: Il Mulino, 549–92.

Calabrese, Andrea (1992). ‘Some remarks on focus and logical structure in Italian’, Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 91–127.

Cardinaletti, Anna (2001). ‘A second thought on Emarginazione: Destressing vs. “Right Dislocation”’, in Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 117–35.

Cardinaletti, Anna (2002). ‘Against Optional and Null Clitics. Right Dislocation vs. Marginalization’, Studia Linguistica (56): 29–57.

Cardinaletti, Anna (2004). ‘Towards a cartography of subject positions’,in Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 115–65.

Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti (1991). ‘Partitive “ne” and the QP-Hypothesis: a case study’, Working Paper. <http://lear.unive.it/handle/10278/411> (28 October, 2012).

(p.317) Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke (1999). ‘The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of three classes of pronouns’, in Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 145–233.

Cecchetto, Carlo (1999). ‘A Comparative Analysis of Left and Right Dislocation in Romance’, Studia Linguistica 53(1): 40–67.

Cheng, Lisa & Laura Downing (2009). ‘Where’s the topic in Zulu?’, The Linguistic Review 26 (2–3): 207–38.

Cheng, Lisa & Laura Downing (2012). ‘Against focusP: arguments from Zulu’, in Ivona Kučerová & Ad Neeleman (eds.), Contrast and Positions in Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 247–66.

Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cinque, Guglielmo (1990). Types of Ā-Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cinque, Guglielmo (1993). ‘A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress’, Linguistic Inquiry (24): 239–97.

Cinque, Guglielmo (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads. (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cinque, Guglielmo (2004). ‘“Restructuring” and Functional Structure’, in Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: the Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 132–91.

Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi (2009). ‘The Cartography of Syntactic Structures’, in Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–65.

Corbett, Greville (1979). ‘The Agreement Hierarchy’, Journal of Linguistics (15): 203–23.

Costa, João (1998). Word Order Variation. A constraint-based approach. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

Costa, João (2010). ‘Prosodic prominence: a syntactic matter?’, in Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Lisa Rochman (eds.), The Sound Patterns of Syntax. (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93–109.

Crocco, Claudia (2013). ‘Is Italian Clitic Right Dislocation grammaticalised? A prosodic analysis of yes/no questions and statements’, Lingua 133: 30–52.

Cruschina, Silvio (2010). ‘Syntactic extraposition and clitic resumption in Italian’, Lingua 120: 50–73.

De Cat, Cecile (2007). ‘French dislocation without movement’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(3): 485–534.

Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko (2002). ‘Decomposing Pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–42.

Dehé, Nicole (2004). ‘On the order of objects in Icelandic double object constructions’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 85–108.

Dehé, Nicole (2005). ‘The Optimal Placement of up and ab—A Comparison’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 185–224.

Downing, Laura (2006). ‘The prosody and syntax of focus in Chitumbuka’, Papers in Bantu Grammar and Description. (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 43). Berlin: ZAS, 55–79.

(p.318) Downing, Laura (2008). ‘Focus and Prominence in Chichewa, Chitumbuka, and Durban Zulu’, ZAS Papers in Linguistics 49. Berlin: ZAS, 47–65.

Downing, Laura (2012). ‘On the (Non-)congruence of Focus and Prominence in Tumbuka’, in Michael Marlo, Nikki Adams, Christopher Green, Michelle Morrison, & Tristan Purvis (eds.), Selected Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 122–33.

Downing, Laura J. & Bernd Pompino-Marschall (2013). ‘The focus prosody of Chichewa and the Stress-Focus constraint: a response to Samek-Lodovici (2005)’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31(3): 647–81.

Egerland, Verner (1996). The Syntax of Past Participles: A Generative Study of Nonfinite Constructions in Ancient and Modern Italian. Lund: Lund University Press.

Engdahl, Elisabet (1983). ‘Parasitic Gaps’, Linguistics and Philosophy 6(1): 5–34.

Ernst, Thomas Boyden (2002). The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi (1973). On the Nature of Island Constraints. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fanselow, Gisbert & Denisa Lenertová (2011). ‘Left peripheral focus: mismatches between syntax and information structure’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(1): 169–209.

Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader (1993). Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses and Words. Boston: Kluwer.

Feldhausen, Ingo (2008). ‘The Prosody–Syntax Interface in Catalan’, PhD dissertation, University of Potsdam.

Feldhausen, Ingo (2010). Sentential Form and Prosodic Structure of Catalan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Fernández, Javier (2012). ‘The Syntax of PredNPs’, MA Thesis, University College London.

Féry, Caroline (2006). ‘Wide Focus Object Fronting’, ms, University of Potsdam. <http://www.sfb632.uni-potsdam.de/publications/A1/A1_Fery_2007a.pdf>.

Féry, Caroline (2007). ‘Information Structural Notions and the Fallacy of Invariant Correlates’, in Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, & Manfred Krifka (eds.), The Notions of Information Structure. (Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6). Potsdam: Universitätverlag Potsdam, 161–84.

Féry, Caroline (2013). ‘Focus as prosodic alignment’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31(3): 683–734.

Féry, Caroline & Vieri Samek-Lodovici (2006). ‘Focus Projection and Prosodic Prominence in Nested Foci’, Language 82(1): 131–50.

FICLIT - Universitá di Bologna (2001). CORIS - Corpus di italiano scritto contemporaneo. Bologna, Italy. <http://corpora.ficlit.unibo.it/>.

Fontana, Josep (1993). ‘Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish’, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Frascarelli, Mara (2000). The Syntax–Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Frascarelli, Mara (2004). ‘Dislocation, Clitic Resumption and Minimality: A comparative analysis of left and right Topic constructions in Italian’, in Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Mahne, & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 98–118.

(p.319) Frascarelli, Mara (2007). ‘Subject topics and the interpretation of referential pro. An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 691–734.

Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl (2007). ‘Types of topics in German and Italian’, in Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning, and Form. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistic Today 100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87–116.

Freidin, Robert (1986). ‘Fundamental issues in the theory of binding’, in Barbara Lust (ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora. Dordrecht: Reidel, 151–88.

Fudge, Erik (1990). ‘Review of An Essay on Stress by M. Halle; J.-R. Vergnaud’, Journal of Linguistics 26(2): 524–31.

Gerlach, Birgit (1998). Restrictions on Clitic Sequences and Conditions on the Occurrence of Clitics in Romance. (Theorie Des Lexicon - Arbeiten Des Sonderforschungsbereich 282). Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.

Gerlach, Birgit (2002). Clitics between Syntax and Lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ghini, Mirco (1993). ‘Phi-formation in Italian. A new proposal’, in Carrie Dyck (ed.), Special issue on complexity in phonological representations. (Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 12). University of Toronto, 41–78.

Giusti, Giuliana (1991). ‘The categorial status of quantified nominals’ Article <http://dspace-unive.cilea.it/handle/10278/748>.

Göbbel, Edward (2012). ‘Extraposition of relative clauses: Phonological solutions’, ms, University of Wuppertal. <http://www.alice-dsl.net/edward.goebbel/Homepage/Publications_files/Relative%20clause%20extraposition.pdf> (4 January, 2013).

Göbbel, Edward (2013). ‘Extraposition of defocused and light PPs in English’, in Manfred Sailer, Heike Walker, & Gert Webelhuth (eds.), Rightward movement from a crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 399–438.

Godard, Danièle & Jean-Marie Marandin (2006). ‘Reinforcing Negation: the case of Italian’, in Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of HPSG 06. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 174–94.

Grimshaw, Jane (1997). ‘Projections, Heads, and Optimality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 373–422.

Grimshaw, Jane (2000). ‘Locality and Extended Projection’, in Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert, & Jane Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical Specification and Insertion, 115–34. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Grimshaw, Jane (2001). ‘Economy of Structure in OT’, ms, Rutgers Optimality Archive 434.

Grimshaw, Jane (2002). ‘Economy of Structure in OT’, in Angela Carpenter, Andries Coetzee, & Paul de Lacy (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory II, vol. 26. (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers). Amherst, MA: GLSA, 81–129.

Grimshaw, Jane (2006). ‘Chains as Unfaithful Optima’, Wondering at the Natural Fecundity of Things: Essays in Honor of Alan Prince. UC Santa Cruz: Linguistic Research Centre, 97–109.

Grimshaw, Jane & Vieri Samek-Lodovici (1995). ‘Optimal Subjects’, in Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey, & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst, MA: GLSA, 589–606.

Grimshaw, Jane & Vieri Samek-Lodovici (1998). ‘Optimal Subjects and Subject Universals’, in Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis, & David Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough?. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 193–219.

(p.320) Gussenhoven, Carlos (1991). The English Rhythm Rule as an accent deletion rule. Phonology 8(01): 1–35.

Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrígo (2002). ‘Focus, Word Order Variation and Intonation in Spanish and English’, in Caroline Wiltshire & Joaquim Camps (eds.), Romance Phonology and Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–53.

Haegeman, Liliane (1994). ‘Negative Heads and Negative Operators: the NEG Criterion’, in Barbara Lust, Margarita Suñer, & John Whitman (eds.), Heads, Projections, and Learnability. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates, 37–52.

Haegeman, Liliane (1995). The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud (1987). An Essay on Stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hamlaoui, Fatima (2008). ‘Focus, contrast, and the syntax–phonology interface: the case of French cleft-sentences’, Current Issues in Unity and Diversity of Languages. Collection of the papers selected from the 18th International Congress of Linguists. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.

Hamlaoui, Fatima (2011). ‘On the role of phonology and discourse in Francilian French wh-questions’, Journal of Linguistics 47: 129–62.

Harford, Carolyn & Katherine Demuth (1999). ‘Prosody outranks syntax: An Optimality approach to subject inversion in Bantu relatives’, Linguistic Analysis 29: 46–68.

Hayes, Bruce (1989). ‘The Prosodic Hierarchy in Meter’, in Paul Kiparsky & Gilbert Youmans (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology. Rhythm and Meter 1. San Diego: Academic Press, 201–60.

Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical Stress Theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Higginbotham, James (1985). ‘On semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–93.

Hoot, Bradley (2012). ‘Narrow Focus on Pre-nominal Modifiers in Spanish: An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis’, in Kimberly Geeslin & Manuel Díaz-Campos (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 293–307.

Horvath, Julia (2010). ‘“Discourse features”, syntactic displacement and the status of contrast’, Lingua 120(6): 1346–69.

Iatridou, Sabine (1995). ‘Clitics and island effects’ in Roumyana Izvorski & Victoria Tredinnick (eds.), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 2. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, 11–30.

Isac, Daniela (2004). ‘Focus on Negative Concord’, in Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Mahne, & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119–40.

Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan (2004). ‘The Syntax of Sentential Stress’, PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto.

Kayne, Richard (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kayne, Richard (1995). Class lectures at Harvard.

Kayne, Richard & Jean Yves Pollock (2008). ‘Toward an Analysis of French Hyper-Complex Inversion’, ms, New York University and Université Paris-Est Marne la Vallée.

Keller, Frank & Theodora Alexopoulou (2001). ‘Phonology Competes with Syntax: Experimental Evidence for the Interaction of Word Order and Accent Placement in the Realization of Information Structure’, Cognition 79(3): 301–72.

(p.321) Kenesei, István & Irene Vogel (1995). ‘Focus and Phonological Structure’, ms, University of Szeged, University of Delaware.

Kiss, Katalin É. (1998). ‘Identificational Focus versus Information Focus’, Language 74(2): 245–73.

Krifka, Manfred (2007). ‘Basic Notions of Information Structure’, in Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, & Manfred Krifka (eds.), The Notions of Information Structure. (Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6). Potsdam: Universitätverlag Potsdam, 13–55.

Krifka, Manfred (2008). ‘Basic notions of information structure’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55(3): 243–76.

Kuchenbrandt, Imme, Tanja Kupisch, & Esther Rinke (2005). Pronominal Objects in Romance: Comparing French, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian, and Spanish. (Working Papers in Multilingualism). Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.

Ladusaw, William (1992). ‘Expressing Negation’, Proceedings of the Conference on Semantics and Linguistics Theory 2: 237–59.

Laka, Itziar (1990). ‘Negation in Syntax: on the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections’, PhD Dissertation, MIT.

Lambrecht, Knud (1981). Topic, antitopic and verb agreement in non-standard French. Vol. II:6. (Pragmatics and Beyond). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lambrecht, Knud (1986). ‘Topic, Focus, and the Grammar of Spoken French’, PhD dissertation, University of California.

Lebeaux, David (1988). ‘Language Acquisition and the Form of Grammar’, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Lebeaux, David (1990). Relative clauses, licensing, and the nature of derivation. Proceedings of NELS 20. Amherst, MA: GLSA, 318–32.

Li, Kening (2009). ‘An OT Analysis of Informational Focus in Mandarin Chinese’, in Yun Xiao (ed.), Proceedings of the 21st North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, vol. 2. Smithfield, RI: Bryant University, 566–83.

Longobardi, Giuseppe (1991). ‘In Defence of the Correspondence Hypothesis: Island Effects and Parasite Constructions’, in James Huang & Robert May (eds.), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 149–96.

López, Luis (2003). ‘Steps for a well-adjusted dislocation’, Studia Linguistica 57(3): 193–231.

López, Luis (2009). A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lovestrand, Joseph (2009). Prosodically Motivated Focus in Hausa: an Optimality Theory Account. (Occasional Papers in Applied Linguistics 1). Dallas, TX: Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics.

Luraghi, S. & C. Parodi (2008). Key terms in syntax and syntactic theory. Continuum.

McCarthy, J. & A. Prince (1993). Generalized Alignment. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.

Manzini, Rita & Leonardo Savoia (2002). ‘Parameters of Subject Inflection in Italian Dialects’, in Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157–200.

(p.322) Manzotti, Emilio & Alessandra Rigamonti (1991). ‘La Negazione’, in Lorenzo Renzi & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 2. Bologna: Il Mulino, 245–317.

Moravcsik, Edith A. (1978). ‘Agreement’, in Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 4 Syntax. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 331–74.

Müller, Gereon (1996). ‘A Constraint on Remnant Movement’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14(2): 355–407.

Müller, Gereon (1998). Incomplete Category Fronting: A Derivational Approach to Remnant Movement in German. (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 42). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Müller, Gereon (2004). ‘Phase impenetrability and wh-intervention’, in Arthur Stepanov, Gisbert Fanselow, & Ralf Vogel (eds.), Minimality Effects in Syntax. (Studies in Generative Grammar 70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 289–326.

Müller, Gereon (2011). Constraints on Displacement: A Phase-based Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Nava, Emily & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (2010). ‘Deconstructing the Nuclear Stress Algorithm’, in Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Lisa Rochman (eds.), The Sound Patterns of Syntax. (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 291–316.

Neeleman, Ad & Hans van de Koot (2008). ‘Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11(2): 137–89.

Neeleman, Ad & Hans van de Koot (2012). ‘Towards a Unified Encoding of Contrast and Scope’, in Ad Neeleman & Reiko Vermeulen (eds.), The Syntax of Topic, Focus and Contrast: An Interface-Based Approach. (Studies in Generative Grammar). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 39–76.

Neeleman, Ad & Tanya Reinhart (1998). Scrambling and the PF Interface. The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors. CSLI. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 309–53.

Neeleman, Ad, Elena Titov, Hans van de Koot, & Reiko Vermeulen (2007). A Syntactic Typology of Topic, Focus and Contrast. lingBuzz/000562.

Neeleman, Ad & Reiko Vermeulen (2012). ‘The Syntactic Expression of Information Structure’, in Ad Neeleman & Reiko Vermeulen (eds.), The Syntax of Topic, Focus, and Contrast. (Studies in Generative Grammar). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–38.

Neeleman, Ad & Fred Weerman (2001). Flexible Syntax. (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Nespor, Marina & Maria Teresa Guasti (2002). ‘Focus-Stress Alignment and its Consequences for Acquisition’, Lingue e linguaggio (1/2002). doi:10.1418/7558.

Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel (1986). Prosodic Phonology. (Studies in Generative Grammar 28). Dordrecht: Foris.

Nissenbaum, Jonathan W. (2000). ‘Investigations of covert phrase movement’, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. <http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8842>.

Ordoñez, Francisco (1997). ‘Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and Other Romance Languages’, PhD dissertation, City University of New York.

Penka, Doris (2011). Negative Indefinites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pinto, Manuela (1997). Licensing and interpretation of inverted subjects in Italian. Utrecht: UiL OTS.

(p.323) Poletto, Cecilia (2006). ‘Parallel phases: a study on the high and low periphery of Old Italian’, in Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of Interpretation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 261–92.

Portolan, Daniele (2005). ‘Informational Effects: the Interrelationship of Narrow Syntax and Information Structure’, PhD dissertation, University of Siena.

Prince, Alan (2002). ‘Entailed ranking arguments’, ms, Rutgers University. Rutgers Optimality Archives.

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. (Technical Report). Rutgers University: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

Reinhart, Tanya (1995). Interface Strategies. Utrecht University: Uil OTS Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 95–102.

Renzi, Lorenzo (1988). Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione. vol. 1. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Repp, Sophie (2010). ‘Defining “contrast” as an information-structural notion in grammar’, Lingua 120(6): 1333–45.

Riggle, Jason (2004). ‘Contenders and learning’, in Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher, Angelo Rodríguez, & Benjamin Schmeiser (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 649–62.

Rizzi, Luigi (1982). Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

Rizzi, Luigi (1997). ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.

Rizzi, Luigi (2001). ‘On the Position Int(errogative) in the Left Periphery of the Clause’, in Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax Offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 70–107.

Rizzi, Luigi (2004). ‘Locality and the left periphery’, in Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: the Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 223–51.

Roncone, Fabrizio (2009). Chiamparini-Fassino, dall’asse al gelo. <http://www.corriere.it/politica/09_luglio_02/gelo_fassino_bfa7a008-66c7-11de-9708-00144f02aabc.shtml> (1 July, 2009).

Rooth, Mats (1985). ‘Association with Focus’, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Rooth, Mats (1992). ‘A theory of focus interpretation’, Natural Language Semantics 1(1): 75–116.

Ross, John Robert (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Saccon, Graziella (1993). ‘Postverbal Subjects’, PhD dissertation, Harvard University.

Safir, Ken (1999). ‘Vehicle Change and Reconstruction in Ā-Chains’, Linguistic Inquiry 30(4): 587–620.

Salvi, Giampaolo (1986). ‘Asimmetrie soggetto/tema in Italiano’, in Harro Stammerjohann (ed.), Theme-Rheme in Italian. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 37–54.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri (1996). ‘Constraints on Subjects. An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis’, Rutgers University.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri (2002). ‘Agreement Impoverishment under Subject Inversion - A Crosslinguistic Analysis’, in Gisbert Fanselow & Caroline Féry (eds.), Resolving Conflicts (p.324) in Grammars: Optimality Theory in Syntax, Morphology, and Phonology. (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 11). Helmut Buske Verlag, 49–82.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri (2005). ‘Prosody–Syntax Interaction in the Expression of Focus’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 687–755.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri (2006). ‘When right dislocation meets the left-periphery: A unified analysis of Italian non-final focus’, Lingua 116(6): 836–73.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri (2009). ‘Topic, focus, and background in Italian Clauses’, in Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds.), Focus and Background in Romance Languages. (Studies in Language Companion Series 112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 333–57.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri (2010). ‘Final and non-final focus in Italian DPs’, in Marjo van Koppen, Maria Dyakonova, Norbert Corver, & Enoch Aboh (eds.), Special issue on DP-internal information structure, vol. 120. (Lingua). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 802–18.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri (2013a). ‘Optimality Theory as a Possible Framework for the Minimalist Programme’, in Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Parodi (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 452–62.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri (2013b). ‘Optimality Theory and the Minimalist Program’, in Hans Broekhuis & Ralf Vogel (eds.), Linguistic Derivations and Filtering. (Advances in Optimality Theory). London: Equinox, 222–37.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri (to appear). ‘Constraint Conflict and Information Structure’, in Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), Handbook of Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri & Alan Prince (1999). Optima. (Technical Reports of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science). Rutgers University.

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri & Alan Prince (2002). Fundamental Properties of Harmonic Bounding. (Technical Reports of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science). Rutgers University.

Sanchez, Liliana (2005). Clitic Doubling and The Checking of Focus. <http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~lsanchez/researchprojects/Focus_doubling.pdf>.

Schmid, Tanja & Ralf Vogel (2004). ‘Dialectal Variation in German 3-Verb Clusters: A Surface-Oriented Optimality Theoretic Account’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7(3): 235–74.

Schwarzschild, Roger (1999). ‘Givenness, AvoidF, and Other Constraints on the Placement of Accent’, Natural Language Semantics 7(2): 141–77.

Selkirk, Elisabeth (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Selkirk, Elisabeth (1986). ‘On Derived Domains in Sentence Phonology’, Phonology Yearbook 3: 371–405.

Selkirk, Elisabeth (1995). ‘Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress, and Phrasing’, in John Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 550–69.

Shklovsky, Kirill (2013). EmfTree. Cambridge, MA: Dept. of Linguistics, MIT.

Šimík, Radek, Marta Wierzba, & Beste Kamali (2013). ‘Prosodic Marking of Givenness in Czech’, paper given at the Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 22, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CA.

Sportiche, Dominique (2012). Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure: Subjects, Agreement, Case and Clitics. London/New York: Routledge.

(p.325) Stowell, Timothy (1981). ‘Origins of Phrase Structure’, PhD dissertation, MIT.

Suñer, Margarita (2006). ‘Left dislocation with and without epithets’, Probus 18: 127–58.

Szabolcsi, Anna (2001). ‘The Syntax of Scope’, in Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell, 607–33.

Szendröi, Kriszta (2001). ‘Focus and the Syntax–Phonology Interface’, PhD dissertation, University College London.

Szendröi, Kriszta (2002). ‘Stress–Focus correspondence in Italian’, in Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen, & Paola Monachesi (eds.), Romance Language and Linguistic Theory 2000. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 287–304.

Szendröi, Kriszta (2003). ‘A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus’, The Linguistic Review 20(1): 37–78.

Teeple, David (2007). ‘The Placement of Arabic Pronominal Clitics’, ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.

Teeple, David (2008). ‘Prosody Can Outrank Syntax’, in Charles Chang & Hannah Haynie (eds.). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 454–62.

Teeple, David (2011). ‘Focus and Accusative Pronouns in Arabic’, in Nicholas LaCara, Anie Thompson, & Matthew Tucker (eds.), Morphology at Santa Cruz: Papers in Honor of Jorge Hankamer. <http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0x56z6r8#page-1> (24 August, 2012).

Tesar, Bruce (1995). ‘Computational Optimality Theory’, PhD dissertation, University of Colorado.

Torrego, Esther (1995). ‘On the nature of clitic doubling’, in Héctor Campos & Paula Marie Kempchinsky (eds.), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 399–418.

Truckenbrodt, Hubert (1995). ‘Phonological phrases—their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence’, PhD dissertation, MIT.

Truckenbrodt, Hubert (1999). ‘On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases’, Linguistic Inquiry 30(2): 219–55.

Truswell, Robert (2007a). ‘Extraction from adjuncts and the structure of events’, Lingua 117: 1355–77.

Truswell, Robert (2007b). ‘Locality of Wh-movement and the Individuation of Events’, University College London.

Truswell, Robert (2009). ‘Tense, Events, and Extraction from Adjuncts’, in Malcolm Elliott, James Kirby, Osamu Sawada, Eleni Staraki, & Suwon Yoon (eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. University of Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Uriagereka, Juan (1995). ‘Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement’, Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123.

Vallduví, Enric (1992). The Informational Component. New York: Garland.

Vallduví, Enric (1994). ‘Detachment in Catalan and information packaging’, Journal of Pragmatics 22: 573–601.

Vendler, Zeno (1957). ‘Verbs and times’, Philosophical Review 66: 143–60.

Vermeulen, Reiko (2007). ‘Japanese wa-phrases that aren’t topics’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 19, University College London, 183–201.

(p.326) Vikner, Sten (2001a). ‘V°-to-I° movement and do-Insertion’, in Geraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw, & Sten Vikner (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 427–64.

Vikner, Sten (2001b). ‘Verb Movement Variation in Germanic and Optimality Theory’, Habilitation Thesis, University of Tübingen.

Villalba, Xavier (1998). ‘Right dislocation is not right dislocation’, in Olga Fullana & Francesc Roca (eds.), Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Language. Girona: Universitat de Girona, 227–41.

Villalba, Xavier (2000). ‘The Syntax of Sentence Periphery’, PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Villalba, Xavier & Laia Mayol (2013). ‘Right-dislocation in Catalan: Tails, Polarity and Activation’, International Review of Pragmatics 5(1): 87–117.

Wal, Jenneke van der (2009). Word order and information structure in Makhuwa-Enahara. Utrecht: LOT.

Zanuttini, Raffaella (1991). ‘Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A comparative Study of Romance Languages’, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Zeijlstra, Hedzer (2004). Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Utrecht University: LOT.

Zeller, Jochen (2006). ‘On clitic left dislocation in Zulu’, Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 18: 131–56.

Zepter, Alexandra (2003). ‘Phrase Structure Directionality: Having a Few Choices’, PhD Dissertation, Rutgers University.

Zerbian, Sabine (2006). Expression of information structure in the Bantu language Northern Sotho, vol. 45. (ZAS Papers in Linguistics). Berlin: ZAS.

Zerbian, Sabine, Susanne Genzel, & Frank Kügler (2010). ‘Experimental work on prosodically-marked information structure in selected African languages (Afroasiatic and Niger-Congo)’, paper presented at Speech Prosody 2010 Conference, Chicago.

Zimmermann, Malte (2006). ‘Focus in Western Chadic: A Unified OT-Account’, in Christopher Davis, Amy Rose Deal, & Youri Zabbal (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 36, vol. 1. Amherst: GLSA, 77–88.

Zimmermann, Malte (2008). ‘Contrastive focus and emphasis’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55(3): 347–60.

Zimmermann, Malte & Edgar Onea (2011). ‘Focus marking and focus interpretation’, Lingua 121(11): 1651–70.

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (1994a). The grammatical representation of Topic and Focus: implications for the Structure of the Clause. (Working Papers in Linguistics). Venezia: Università degli Studi di Venezia.

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (1994b). ‘On Some Prosodically Governed Syntactic Operations’, in Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi, & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), Paths toward Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 473–85.

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (1998). Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (2010). ‘The Syntax and Prosody of Focus: The Bantu–Italian Connection’, Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2.1: 131–68.