Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Private International Law and Global Governance$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Horatia Muir Watt and Diego P. Fernández Arroyo

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780198727620

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198727620.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 26 April 2019

Balancing the Public and the Private in International Investment Law

Balancing the Public and the Private in International Investment Law

Chapter:
8 Balancing the Public and the Private in International Investment Law
Source:
Private International Law and Global Governance
Author(s):

Yannick Radi

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198727620.003.0009

This chapter considers the intricate relations between the public interest embodied by host states and the private interest of foreign investors. While international investment law is often conceived of as favouring investors’ interests at the expense of public interest, the chapter argues that due consideration has always been granted to public interest in this regime and that public interest is likely to play an increasing role in the future. From that perspective, this chapter analyzes the relations between public and private interests both in states’ treaty practice and arbitration practice. More precisely, it explains how conventional practice can be viewed as crystallizing a balancing between public and private interests and examines the tools that are available to arbitration tribunals to balance these interests. In this respect, the chapter discusses the notion of legitimate expectations, proportionality, precedent, and jurisprudence constantes

Keywords:   public interest, private interest, investment arbitration, epistemic community, FET, legitimate expectations, indirect expropriation, proportionality, precedent, jurisprudences constantes

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .