Eurocentricism and the Nation-State in the Combat Motivation Debates
Debates over combat motivation presuppose a set of Eurocentric assumptions about soldiers and armies. These include the notions that armies are modern, that Western national armies constitute the norm against which to conceive and study armies in general, and that ethnic or national identities take essentialist form. This chapter shows how these assumptions have shaped the debates and foreclosed other analytic possibilities. In particular, ethnicity and the nation were used to resolve the indeterminacies of primary group theory. Foreign and colonial armies—subaltern soldiers—are used to critique Eurocentrism and open up new directions for inquiry. The chapter goes on to develop Anthony King’s practical paradigm, which foreground specific situational and contextual factors in shaping the actions of soldiers.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.