History and Contradiction
A radical language of corruption often involved catastrophic or apocalyptic expectations. Hazlitt’s calculated engagement with this dimension of contemporary radical discourse shaped his approach to historical representation, particularly his tendency to develop contradictory relationships among competing period frames. The essay “Of Paradox and Common-place” offers revealing evidence of his interest in paradox and his approach to typical or representative figures, notably the poet Percy Shelley and the politician George Canning. While contradictory forces unfold throughout his political prose, Hazlitt remained committed to radical expression. His conception of “Legitimacy” as a form of power that required absolute submission underwrote his determination to “be critical” and to value the “word uttered against” as an indispensable form of protest.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.