Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Self-Determination and Secession in International Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christian Walter, Antje von Ungern-Sternberg, and Kavus Abushov

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780198702375

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: August 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702375.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 December 2018

Eritrea

Eritrea

Chapter:
(p.273) 14 Eritrea
Source:
Self-Determination and Secession in International Law
Author(s):

Gregory Fox

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702375.003.0014

Direct comparisons between Eritrea and CIS self-determination claims are made difficult by Eritrea’s status as both a colony and a territory whose disposition was controlled by a peace treaty among the major powers—none of the CIS territories share these crucial characteristics, which in various formulations form the basis for two of the three Eritrean claims. The Eritrean case does provide useful guidance, however, on the effect of time on claims of self-determination. It may stand as a clear example of the ex injuria jus non-oritur maxim. Despite almost 30 years of effective control by Ethiopia accompanied by acquiescence by the international community, one may argue that Eritrea’s self-determination rights were not extinguished. The response to this argument is that Eritrea did not achieve independence in 1993 pursuant to a legal entitlement but rather a military victory followed by Ethiopia granting permission to secede.

Keywords:   Eritrea, Ethiopia, United Nations General Assembly, Italy, Four Powers, decolonization, peace treaties, remedial secession, ex injuria jus non oritur

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .