Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Use of Tools by Human and Non-human Primates$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

A. Berthelet and J. Chavaillon

Print publication date: 1993

Print ISBN-13: 9780198522638

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198522638.001.0001

ContentsFRONT MATTER

Are we able to determine the function of the earliest palaeolithic tools?

Chapter:
(p. 225 ) 12 Are we able to determine the function of the earliest palaeolithic tools?
Source:
The Use of Tools by Human and Non-human Primates
Author(s):

Sylvie Beyries

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198522638.003.0012

Microscope examination of neolithic and middle palaeolithic tools shows that the marks on the earlier tools are generally longer and more difficult to interpret. The later tools almost always show more characteristic wear traces. The colder the tool, the more difficult it is to determine the ergonomy. This does not mean that the validity of the results obtained for the earliest tools is in question, but only that the interpretations are more difficult and therefore less precise. All experiments designed to find out how use-wear traces disappear have been carried out with respect to archaeological studies concerned essentially with upper palaeolithic or neolithic material.

Keywords:   palaeolithic tools, neolithic tools, wear traces, ergonomy, archaeological studies

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .