Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Knowledge, Policy, and ExpertiseThe UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 1970–2011$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Susan Owens

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780198294658

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198294658.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 March 2019

Giving Good Advice?

Giving Good Advice?

Chapter:
(p.146) 7 Giving Good Advice?
Source:
Knowledge, Policy, and Expertise
Author(s):

Susan Owens

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198294658.003.0007

This chapter has three roles. First, it draws out the distinctive characteristics of the Commission that were critical to its standing and influence—its authority, autonomy, breadth, and continuities of form and practice, and its positioning at the intersection of epistemic and policy networks. It shows how the Commission’s authority and autonomy were actively constructed over time, and how ‘interdisciplinary deliberation’, policy learning, boundary work, and co-production were vital to its capacity to have effect. It then examines the factors that made abolition possible after forty-one years, including the nature of environmental issues, structures of governance, attitudes towards expertise, and new forms of accountability, as well as proximate political priorities. Finally, the Commission’s attributes, achievements, survival, and demise are related to the wider questions about knowledge and policy (and science and politics) identified in Chapter 1, and the implications for the future of ‘good advice’ are considered.

Keywords:   authority, autonomy, networks, interdisciplinary deliberation, boundary work, co-production, learning, accountability, influence, good advice, abolition

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .