As Otto asserts that those who have yet to feel religious experience are not to read further into his book, we find that the book is aimed only at those who have had spiritual orientation, and his philosophical aims do not encompass the intensification of his readers' experiences and of various religious sensibilities. Otto did not include in his concerns as a theologian and as a phenomenologist of religion the participation on whether numinous experience really exists. Although the debate is evidently not over, it continues in a more subtle manner compared to how it was aggravated in the period of the Vienna Circle. Postmodern situations attempt to provide interesting ways of evaluating the worth of numinous experience. In this chapter, the author assumes in some part that numinous experience is partially constructed in terms of a concept of holiness although it cannot give independent proof for the numen's existence. We examine whether Otto was successful in establishing a typology of primary religious experience.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.