Acting, Willing, and Trying
This chapter examines the role of volition in determining liability in criminal attempts. It discusses different types of volitions and provides a functionalist account alongside H.A. Prichard's account of volition. These both consider bodily movements as non-basic actions. It argues that neither the simple doctrine of basic actions as bodily movements nor the various arguments for volitionism provide tenable accounts of human action. The chapter explains the volitionist concept hypothetical and categorical criteria of movement and the differences between an act and activity.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.