This chapter examines several prominent areas of tort law and asks whether consent or the moral principle as described and endorsed, could justify the substitution of a negligence rule for strict liability. These inquiries are illustrative, not comprehensive. It offers some remarks about the relations between intent, voluntariness, consent, and the duty of potential plaintiffs to protect themselves. Black-letter tort law counts harm as intentional if it results from an act (or perhaps an omission) the agent knew or should have known to be a proscribed invasion of the victim's right.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.