Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
John Wilkes$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Peter D. G. Thomas

Print publication date: 1996

Print ISBN-13: 9780198205449

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198205449.001.0001

The Reporting of Parliamentary Debates: The Wilkes Coup of 1771

Chapter:
(p.125) 8 The Reporting of Parliamentary Debates: The Wilkes Coup of 1771
Source:
John Wilkes
Author(s):

Peter D. G. Thomas

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198205449.003.0008

This chapter discusses the reporting of Parliamentary debates. These have been repeatedly and successfully suppressed by direct action of both Houses of Parliament. This censorship was due mostly to Wilkes, who masterminded the tactical coup in the 1760s. However, the metropolitan press expanded significantly from 1768, until there were no less than five daily papers being published in London. The chapter looks at the different publications that attempted to report these debates and the events that took place. It also notes Wilkes' most significant gain for ‘liberty’, the ‘Printer Case’. This was his victory over the authority of the House of Commons and the House of Lords after the latter attempted to arrest the printer of the Public Ledger.

Keywords:   reporting, Parliamentary debates, House of Commons, House of Lords, censorship, liberty, Printer Case, metropolitan press

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.