Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Uncertain UnionsMarriage in England 1660–1753$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lawrence Stone

Print publication date: 1992

Print ISBN-13: 9780198202530

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198202530.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 November 2018

Moseley v. Collier, 1746–1747

Moseley v. Collier, 1746–1747

Cross-class Courtship in the Bath Marriage Market

Chapter:
(p.68) 4 Moseley v. Collier, 1746–1747
Source:
Uncertain Unions
Author(s):

Lawrence Stone

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198202530.003.0005

This chapter presents a case study on cross-class courtship in the Bath marriage market in England, focusing on the case Moseley v. Collier which was decided by the court in 1747. The case was filed by lawyer Arthur Collier against Elizabeth Moseley, daughter of the First Baronet of Rolleston in Staffordshire. The case reveals the peculiar advantages and disadvantages of Bath as a marriage market and as a place of intrigue.

Keywords:   courtship, court cases, Moseley v. Collier, Arthur Collier, Elizabeth Moseley, marriage market, Bath, England

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .