Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Cicero the Advocate$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jonathan Powell and Jeremy Paterson

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9780198152804

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198152804.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 November 2017

Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof

Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof

Chapter:
(p.187) 7 Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof
Source:
Cicero the Advocate
Author(s):

Christopher Craig

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198152804.003.0008

In his defence of his friend Milo, who has been accused of seditious violence for murdering Cicero's enemy Clodius, Cicero argued that, even if Milo had murdered Clodius, he should still be acquitted because the removal of Clodius was in the best interests of the res publica. Cicero's assertion of veracity, in the midst of a torrent of invective asserting that Clodius was murderous, rapacious, sacrilegious, unsparing of his own family, guilty of incest with his sister, hateful to the gods, and a clear and present danger to the continued survival of the Roman state, nicely underscores the problem of audience perceptions of invective in Ciceronian oratory. This chapter examines why Cicero feels the need for this assertion by analysing his speech for Milo as a case study of his use of invective in a judicial speech. It also discusses whether the audience expects exuberant ad hominem attacks not to be true, and if they do not, then what is the relationship of ad hominem attacks to factually probative argument.

Keywords:   invective, defence, veracity, Milo, Clodius, judicial speech, ad hominem attacks, argument

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .