Sigmund Freud acknowledged that his theory needed homosexuality. However, to what extent did he actually discover these ‘homosexual currents’ or rather construct something which his theory needed? It might be said that he half discovered, and more than half produced them — if only to register their paradoxical, excessive, and often fraught status in psychoanalytic theory. Whatever, once invoked, ‘homosexuality’ kept problematizing not only the prevailing categories of psychosexual normality — something which Freud clearly wanted it to do — but also the theory which needed it, and which its discovery initially enabled. The various ways in which it did so, either independently, or as a representative of the perversions, is the subject of this chapter. Before pursuing this intriguing connection between homosexuality, perversion, and deconstruction, there is another kind of problem in Freud, more mundane yet equally important. It concerns the tension between theory and evidence.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.