Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The International Law of the SeaIndia and the UN Convention of 1982$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780198060000

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198060000.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 September 2018

Epilogue Future Directions

Epilogue Future Directions

Chapter:
(p.242) 8 Epilogue Future Directions
Source:
The International Law of the Sea
Author(s):

O.P. Sharma

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198060000.003.0008

This chapter presents future directions on the international law of the sea. The author believes that problems faced by each nation are global in nature, and transcend political boundaries. Sea borne commerce is expected to quadruple in the near future, making the freedom and the security of the sea imperative. The Third UNCLOS resolved most of the contradictions plaguing the earlier law of the sea, including the reconciliation of movement on the sea with the exploitation of its under water environment; reconciling laws regulating the movement of ships on the waters with those relating to the appropriation of the waters; reconciling freedom of the seas with the demands of sovereignty; and reconciling rules for universal regimes with rules serving regional interests. The author feels that archipelago transit and straits used for international navigation will remain potential flash points. He also feels that many developing countries are not yet ready to take advantage of their marine potential, and discusses their inability to take action against the factory fishing methods of major maritime powers intruding in their territories. Marine officers need to be specially educated in international maritime laws. The author concludes by focusing on the ‘invisible enemy of terrorism’, and US intransigence in not becoming party to the Third UNCLOS because of its seabed mining provisions. Soviet reservations of the conclusions of the Third UNCLOS are also discussed.

Keywords:   international law of the sea, Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, freedom of the seas, factory fishing methods, US recalcitrance, Under water environment, archipelago transits, international maritime laws, straits and international navigation

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .