Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Rethinking Schumann$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Roe-Min Kok and Laura Tunbridge

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780195393859

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393859.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 11 December 2017

Choreographing Schumann

Choreographing Schumann

Chapter:
(p.329) 15 Choreographing Schumann
Source:
Rethinking Schumann
Author(s):

Wayne Heisler Jr.

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393859.003.0015

Although Schumann himself did not compose ballets, a number of choreographers have turned to his music. Despite differences in technique, style, aesthetics, time, and place, a common thread emerges in the “Schumann ballets”: his biography as a source for story and staging. This chapter focuses on Heinrich Kröller's 1922 Viennese Carnaval and George Balanchine's Robert Schumann's “Davidsbündlertänze” (1980), premiered by the New York City Ballet. What unites these two ballets is their use of scores that have implicit connections to the biography of their composer, who represents progressiveness and a spiritual authority for Kröller's and Balanchine's respective artistic visions. Working under Richard Strauss, codirector of the Vienna Opera and Ballet, Kröller shared Strauss's vision for its “reform and modernization.” The Philistines in Kröller's Carnaval were a satirical displacement for the conservative ballet culture in interwar Vienna. Thus the overtaking of the ball in Carnaval by the commedia dell'arte represented the implementation of Strauss and Kröller's reform agenda, with Schumann's visionary blessing. As Balanchine's last major choreography, his Davidsbündlertänze are more than the self‐alignment of his legendary formalist modernism with the antiphilistine composer. Peopled with four couples, Balanchine's ballet explores well‐known aspects of Schumann's biography, particularly his relationship with Clara Wieck and his descent into madness. On a deeper level, however, Robert Schumann's “Davidsbündlertänze” is meta‐Balanchine, constituting the choreographer's dual engagement with formalism and narrative, analogous to what Schumann himself described as the struggle between his alter egos Florestan and Eusebius, his “objective” and “subjective” selves, “form and shadow.”

Keywords:   ballet, biography, 20th century, Carnaval, Heinrich Kröller, Vienna Ballet, Davidsbündlertänze, George Balanchine, New York City Ballet

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .