Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
International Human Rights and Mental Disability LawWhen the Silenced are Heard$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael L. Perlin

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780195393231

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393231.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

The Universal Factors

The Universal Factors

Chapter:
(p.81) 5 The Universal Factors
Source:
International Human Rights and Mental Disability Law
Author(s):

Michael L. Perlin

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393231.003.0013

An examination of comparative mental disability law reveals that there are at least five dominant, universal, core factors that must be considered carefully in any evaluation of the key question of whether international human rights standards have been violated. Each of these five factors is a reflection of the shame that the worldwide state of mental disability law brings to all of us who work in this field. Each is tainted by the pervasive corruption of sanism that permeates all of mental disability law. Each reflects a blinding pretextuality that contaminates legal practice in this area. The core factors are: (1) Lack of comprehensive legislation to govern the commitment and treatment of persons with mental disabilities, and failure to adhere to legislative mandates; (2) Lack of independent counsel and lack of consistent judicial review mechanisms made available to persons facing commitment and those institutionalized; (3) A failure to provide humane care to institutionalized persons; (4) Lack of coherent and integrated community programs as an alternative to institutional care; and (5) Failure to provide humane services to forensic patients. In this chapter, each of these universal factors is discussed, and examples are offered from many regions of the world (not primarily from case law nor from sophisticated jurisprudential analyses but mostly from reports done by advocacy agencies and nongovernmental organizations).

Keywords:   mental disability law, international human rights law, institutions, forensic facilities, psychiatry, psychology, counsel, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, universal factors

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .