This chapter considers the Court's usage of consequential arguments. It begins by considering some examples of classic consequential arguments. It then explores various issues that the Court addresses when employing consequential arguments including whether bad consequences are likely to occur, whether the Court can prevent them from occurring, whether the consequences are really that bad and whether the possibility of bad consequences should even influence the decision. It discusses the Court's consideration of whether principled lines can be drawn or whether a case by case approach will work. Finally, the chapter discusses the use of consequential argument as a rhetorical device.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.