This chapter deals with Nāgārjuna’s arguments concerning motion. Nāgārjuna’s two main arguments against motion (the property-absence argument and the property-duplication argument) are analyzed. The chapter argues that these were not meant to function as arguments establishing a particular view of the structure of time and space but are argument-templates concerned with properties and their instantiation. The prominent place of the investigation of motion in Nāgārjuna’s main work is to be explained by the fact that he regards ordinary motion as a sample case of the motion of the subject in transmigratory existence.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.