Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Conservatism and American Political Development$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Brian J. Glenn and Steven M. Teles

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780195373929

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195373929.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 April 2019

Environmental Policy from the Great Society to 1980: A Coalition Comes Unglued

Environmental Policy from the Great Society to 1980: A Coalition Comes Unglued

Chapter:
(p.119) Chapter 4 Environmental Policy from the Great Society to 1980: A Coalition Comes Unglued
Source:
Conservatism and American Political Development
Author(s):

Richard Harris

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195373929.003.0005

Environmentalism, born in the milieu of activism and protest during the 1960s, aimed not only to save the ecosystem but also to open up administrative and policy processes to more democratic impulses that proved hostile to individualism, liberty, and property rights. For conservatives like Reagan, the fundamental challenge of environmental policy therefore lay not in business complaints about rising compliance costs or economists' concern about market inefficiency, but in its animating ideas and its institutional objectives. It is important to understand that these challenges were born, not of the older conservationist policies that many conservatives could support, but rather of the post-1970 variant of environmental policy that sought to democratize the policy process and supplant individualism and liberty with collectivism and planning. An effective response would require a conservative counterrevolution in the policy process that directly addressed the ideational and institutional bases of environmental policy. That response would flow from the confluence of three distinct streams of conservative thought: libertarianism, traditionalism, and anticommunism. This chapter discusses how the fusion of these distinct elements of postwar conservative thought formed the basis for a vigorous and visceral conservative reaction to environmentalist programs. It then turns to an appraisal of two landmark pieces of environmental legislation of the 1970s — the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA) and the Clean Air Amendments Act of 1977 (CAAA) — both of which clearly illustrate the ideational and institutional challenges that environmental policy posed for conservatives.

Keywords:   environmental policies, conservatives, Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, Clean Air Amendments Act of 1977, traditionalism, anticommunism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .