This chapter begins with a discussion of restorative processes and restorative justice. It then argues that an antidesert agenda in large part motivates the academic originators of the “restorative justice” movement. It further argues that restorative processes are not necessarily incompatible with a system of doing justice. Certain restorative processes will be more likely to do justice better than others — in particular, those with more participants rather than fewer — and justice is more likely where restorative processes are used as an integral part of the criminal justice adjudication process rather than as a wholesale substitute for it.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.