Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Limits of LegalityThe Ethics of Lawless Judging$

Jeffrey Brand-Ballard

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780195342291

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195342291.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 17 January 2017

(p.319) Bibliography

(p.319) Bibliography

Source:
Limits of Legality
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Abramson, Leslie W. “Appearance of Impropriety: Deciding When a Judge’s Impartiality ‘Might Reasonably Be Questioned.’” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. 14 (2000): 55–102.

Ackerman, Bruce. “Anatomy of a Constitutional Coup.” London Review of Books, Feb. 8, 2001.

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 1991.

Alexander, Larry. “Constrained by Precedent.” Southern California Law Review 63 (1989): 1–64.

Alexander, Larry. “Deontology at the Threshold.” San Diego Law Review 37 (2000): 893–912.

Alexander, Larry. “The Gap.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 14 (1991): 695–701.

Alexander, Larry. “Law and Exclusionary Reasons.” Philosophical Topics 18 (1990): 5–22.

Alexander, Larry. “‘With Me, It’s All Er Nuthin’: Formalism in Law and Morality.” University of Chicago Law Review 66 (1999): 530–65.

Alexander, Larry, and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan. Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Alexander, Larry, and Ken Kress. “Against Legal Principles.” Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Ed. Andrei Marmor. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995. 279–327.

Alexander, Larry, and Emily Sherwin. The Rule of Rules. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2001.

Alexy, Robert. “A Defence of Radbruch’s Formula.” Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order. Ed. David Dyzenhaus. Oxford: Hart, 1999.

Alfini, James J., et al. Judicial Conduct and Ethics. 4th ed. Newark, N.J.: LexisNexis, 2007.

Almeida, Michael J., ed. Imperceptible Harms and Benefits. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.

Alstyne, William Van. “Notes on a Bicentennial Constitution: Part II, Antinomial Choices and the Role of the Supreme Court.” Iowa Law Review 72 (1987): 1281–99.

Altman, Andrew. Critical Legal Studies: A Liberal Critique. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990.

Altman, Andrew. “Legal Realism, Critical Legal Studies, and Dworkin.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1986): 205–35.

Altman, Scott. “Beyond Candor.” Michigan Law Review 89 (1990): 296–351.

Anderson, Lisa R., and Charles A. Holt. “Information Cascades in the Laboratory.” American Economic Review 87 (1997): 847–62.

Applbaum, Arthur Isak. Ethics for Adversaries: The Morality of Roles in Public and Professional Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999.

(p.320) Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Washbourne, 1915.

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. W. D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.

Atiyah, P. S. Promises, Morals, and Law. Oxford: Clarendon, 1981.

Austin, J. L. “A Plea for Excuses.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57 (1956–57): 1–30.

Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Ed. Wilfrid E. Rumble. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Baier, Kurt. “The Justification of Governmental Authority.” Journal of Philosophy 69 (1972): 700–16.

Bales, R. E. “Act Utilitarianism: Account of Right-Making Characteristics or Decision-Making Procedure.” American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1971): 257–65.

Balkin, J. M., ed. What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said. New York: New York University Press, 2005.

Balkin, J. M., and Bruce A. Ackerman, eds. What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said. New York: New York University Press, 2001.

Balkin, Jack M. “Bush v. Gore and the Boundary between Law and Politics.” Yale Law Journal 110 (2001): 1407–58.

Banerjee, Abhijit. “A Simple Model of Herd Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (1992): 797–818.

Barak, Aharon. Judicial Discretion. Trans. Yadin Kaufmann. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1989.

Baron, Marcia, Philip Pettit, and Michael A. Slote. Three Methods of Ethics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1997.

Bassett, Debra Lyn. “Judicial Disqualification in the Federal Courts.” Iowa Law Review 87 (2002): 1213–56.

Bassett, Debra Lyn. “Recusal and the Supreme Court.” Hastings Law Journal 56 (2005): 657–98.

Bauer, Joseph P. “Addressing the Incoherency of the Preemption Provision of the Copyright Act of 1976.” Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law 10 (2007): 1–119.

Bayles, Michael. Procedural Justice: Allocating to Individuals. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1989.

Benn, S. I., and R. S. Peters. The Principles of Political Thought. New York: Free Press, 1965.

Bennett, Jonathan. The Act Itself. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Bentham, Jeremy. A Fragment on Government. Eds. J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Berger, Raoul. Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977.

Bikhchandani, Sushil, David Hirshleifer, and Ivo Welch. “Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (1998): 151–70.

Bikhchandani, Sushil, David Hirshleifer, and Ivo Welch. “A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (1992): 992–1026.

Bix, Brian. Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.

Black, Hugo L. A Constitutional Faith. New York: Knopf, 1968.

Bloom, Frederic M. “State Courts Unbound.” Cornell Law Review 93 (2008): 501–54.

Bobbitt, Philip. Constitutional Interpretation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.

(p.321) Bonfield, Arthur E. “The Abrogation of Penal Statutes by Nonenforcement.” Iowa Law Review 49 (1964): 389–440.

Bork, Robert H. The Tempting of America. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1990.

Bradley, Gerard V. “Plea Bargaining and the Criminal Defendant’s Obligation to Plead Guilty.” South Texas Law Review 40 (1999): 65–82.

Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. “Contractualism and Deontic Restrictions.” Ethics 114 (2004): 269–300.

Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. “Innocents Lost: Proportional Sentencing and the Paradox of Collateral Damage.” Legal Theory 15 (2009): 65–105.

Bratman, Michael E. “I Intend That We J.” Contemporary Action Theory. Eds. Ghita Holmström-Hintikka and Raimo Tuomela. Vol. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997, 49–63.

Bratman, Michael E. “Shared Intention.” Ethics 104 (1993): 97–113.

Bratman, Michael E. “What Is the Accordion Effect?” Journal of Ethics 10 (2006): 5–19.

Brennan, Samantha. “Thresholds for Rights.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 33 (1995): 143–68.

Brewer, Scott. “Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy.” Harvard Law Review 109 (1996): 923–1028.

Bright, Stephen B. “Let’s Try Brian Nichols Properly the First Time.” Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Nov. 7, 2007, 19A.

Brink, David O. “Legal Positivism and Natural Law Reconsidered.” Monist 68 (1985): 364–87.

Brink, David O. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Brown, Darryl K. “Jury Nullification within the Rule of Law.” Minnesota Law Review 81 (1997): 1149–200.

Budd, Malcolm. “Wittgenstein on Seeing Aspects.” Mind 96 (1987): 1–17.

Burton, Stephen J. Judging in Good Faith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Burton, Stephen J. “Law as Practical Reason.” Southern California Law Review 62 (1989): 747–93.

Bushnell, Eleanore. Crimes, Follies and Misfortunes: The Federal Impeachment Trials. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1992.

Butler, Paul. “When Judges Lie (and When They Should).” Minnesota Law Review 91 (2007): 1785–828.

Calabresi, Guido. A Common Law for the Age of Statutes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.

Caminker, Evan H. “Why Must Inferior Courts Obey Superior Court Precedents?” Stanford Law Review 46 (1994): 817–73.

Cardozo, Benjamin N. “Jurisprudence.” Selected Writings of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo. Ed. Margaret E. Hall. New York: Fallon, 1947.

Cardozo, Benjamin N. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1921.

Carter, Stephen L. “The Religiously Devout Judge.” Notre Dame Law Review 64 (1989): 932–44.

Christopher, Russell L. “Deterring Retributivism: The Injustice of ‘Just’ Punishment.” Northwestern University Law Review 96 (2002): 843–976.

Cohen, Mark A. “The Motives of Judges: Empirical Evidence from Antitrust Sentencing.” International Review of Law and Economics 12 (1992): 13–30.

(p.322) Colby, Paul L. “Two Views of the Legitimacy of Nonacquiescence in Judicial Opinions.” Tulane Law Review 61 (1987): 1041–69.

Coleman, Jules. The Practice of Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Coleman, Jules L., and Brian Leiter. “Determinacy, Objectivity, and Authority.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1993): 549–637.

Conkle, Daniel O. “Religiously Devout Judges: Issues of Personal Integrity and Public Benefit.” Marquette Law Review 81 (1998): 523–32.

Cook, Walter Wheeler. Cases and Other Authorities on Equity. St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1923.

Cooter, Robert D. “The Objectives of Private and Public Judges.” Public Choice 41 (1983): 107–32.

Copp, David. “Introduction: Metaethics and Normative Ethics.” Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Ed. David Copp. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Corvino, John. “Homosexuality and the PIB Argument.” Ethics 115 (2005): 501–34.

Cover, Robert M. Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1975.

Cover, Robert M. “Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal 95 (1986): 1601–29.

Crisp, Roger. “Particularizing Particularism.” Moral Particularism. Eds. Brad Hooker and Margaret Olivia Little. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Cullity, Garrett. The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Cullity, Garrett. “Moral Free Riding.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1995): 3–34.

D’Amato, Anthony. “Aspects of Deconstruction: Refuting Indeterminacy with One Bold Thought.” Northwestern University Law Review 85 (1990): 113–27.

Dagger, Richard. “Playing Fair with Punishment.” Ethics 103 (1993): 473–88.

Damasio, Antonio R. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Harper & Row, 1995.

Dan-Cohen, Meir. “Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law.” Harvard Law Review 97 (1984): 625–77.

Dan-Cohen, Meir. “In Defense of Defiance.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1994): 24–51.

Dancy, Jonathan. Ethics without Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Daniels, Norman. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Darwall, Stephen L. “Agent-Centered Restrictions from the Inside Out.” Philosophical Studies 50 (1986): 291–319.

DePaul, Michael R. Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry. New York: Routledge, 1993.

Dershowitz, Alan M. Supreme Injustice: How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

De Sousa, Ronald. The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987.

Dobbs, Dan B. The Law of Torts. Vol. 2. St. Paul, Minn.: West, 2001.

Drahos, Peter, and Stephen Parker. “Rule Following, Rule Scepticism and Indeterminacy in Law: A Conventional Account.” Ratio Juris 5 (1992): 109–19.

Dressler, Joshua. Understanding Criminal Law. 3rd ed. New York: Lexis, 2001.

Dubber, Markus Dirk. “The Pain of Punishment.” Buffalo Law Review 44 (1996): 545–611.

(p.323) Duncan, William C. “Goodridge and the Rule of Law Same-Sex Marriage in Massachusetts [sic]: The Meaning and Implications of Goodridge v. Department of Public Health.” Boston University Public Interest Law Journal 14 (2004): 42–55.

Duxbury, Neil. “Faith in Reason: The Process Tradition in American Jurisprudence.” Cardozo Law Review 15 (1993): 601–705.

Duxbury, Neil. Random Justice: On Lotteries and Legal Decision-Making. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999.

Dworkin, Ronald. “A Badly Flawed Election.” New York Review of Books, Feb. 8, 2001, 1.

Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.

Dworkin, Ronald. “Hard Cases.” Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977. 81–130.

Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986.

Dworkin, Ronald. Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Knopf, 1993.

Dworkin, Ronald. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985.

Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules I.” Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977. 14–45.

Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules II.” Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977.

Dworkin, Ronald. “A Reply to Critics.” Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978. 291–368.

Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000.

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977.

Dyzenhaus, David. Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems: South African Law in the Perspective of Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991.

Dyzenhaus, David. “Positivism’s Stagnant Research Programme.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (2000): 703–22.

Easterbrook, Frank. “Ways of Criticizing the Court.” Harvard Law Review 95 (1982): 802–32.

Edlin, Douglas E. Judges and Unjust Laws: Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008.

Edmundson, William A. “State of the Art: The Duty to Obey the Law.” Legal Theory 10 (2004): 215–59.

Edmundson, William A. Three Anarchical Fallacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Edwards, Harry T. “To Err Is Human, but Not Always Harmless: When Should Legal Error Be Tolerated?” New York University Law Review 70 (1995): 1167–213.

Eggleston, Ben. “Self-Defeat, Publicity, and Incoherence: Three Criteria for Consequentialist Theories.” Ph.D. diss., University of Pittsburgh, 2001.

Eisenberg, Melvin Aron. An Introduction to Agency, Partnerships, and LLCs. 3rd ed. New York: Foundation, 2000.

Ellis, Anthony. “Deontology, Incommensurability and the Arbitrary.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1992): 855–75.

Ely, John Hart. “The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade.” Yale Law Journal 82 (1973): 920–49.

(p.324) Endicott, Timothy A. O. “The Impossibility of the Rule of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (1999): 1–18.

Enoch, David. “Intending, Foreseeing, and the State.” Legal Theory 13 (2007): 69–99.

Epstein, Richard A. “Blind Justices: The Scandal of Kelo v. New London.” Wall Street Journal, July 3, 2005.

Eskridge, William N., Jr. Dynamic Statutory Interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994.

Estreicher, Samuel. “Judicial Nullification: Guido Calabresi’s Uncommon Common Law for a Statutory Age.” New York University Law Review 57 (1982): 1126–73.

Estreicher, Samuel, and Richard L. Revesz. “Nonacquiescence by Federal Administrative Agencies.” Yale Law Journal 98 (1989): 679–772.

Fallon, Richard H., Jr. “‘The Rule of Law’ as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse.” Columbia Law Review 97 (1997): 1–56.

Farley, John J., III. “Robin Hood Jurisprudence: The Triumph of Equity in American Tort Law.” St. John’s Law Review 65 (1991): 997–1021.

Farnsworth, Ward. “‘To Do a Great Right, Do a Little Wrong’: A User’s Guide to Judicial Lawlessness.” Minnesota Law Review 86 (2001): 227–66.

Farrell, Daniel M. “Punishment without the State.” Noûs 22 (1988): 437–53.

Feinberg, Joel. “Causing Voluntary Actions.” Metaphysics and Explanation. Eds. W. H. Capitan and D. D. Merrill. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1966.

Feinberg, Joel. “Collective Responsibility.” Doing and Deserving. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1970.

Feinberg, Joel. “Noncomparative Justice.” Philosophical Review 83 (1974): 297–338.

Fisher, William W., III, Morton J. Horwitz, and Thomas Reed, eds. American Legal Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Fitzpatrick, William J. “The Intend/Foresee Distinction and the Problem of ‘Closeness.’” Philosophical Studies 128 (2006): 585–617.

Fletcher, George P. “Domination in the Theory of Justification and Excuse.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 57 (1996): 553–78.

Flikschuh, Katrin. “Reason, Right, and Revolution: Kant and Locke.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2008): 375–404.

Forer, Lois. “Justice by Numbers.” Washington Monthly, April 1992.

Frankena, William K. “The Concept of Social Justice.” Social Justice. Ed. Richard Brandt. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1962.

Fraser, David. “‘This Is Not Like Any Other Legal Question’: A Brief History of Nazi Law before U.K. and U.S. Courts.” Connecticut Journal of International Law 19 (2003): 59–125.

Fried, Charles. “The Artificial Reason of the Law Or: What Lawyers Know.” Texas Law Review 60 (1981): 35–58.

Fried, Charles. “Impudence.” Supreme Court Review 1992 (1992): 155–94.

Fried, Charles. “Scholars and Judges: Reason and Power.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 23 (2000): 807–32.

Friedman, Barry. “The Cycles of Constitutional Theory.” Law and Contemporary Problems 67 (2004): 149–74.

Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. 2nd rev. ed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1969.

Fuller, Lon L. “Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart.” Harvard Law Review 71 (1958): 630–72.

Gandhi, M. K. Selected Writings of Mahatma Gandhi. Boston: Beacon, 1951.

(p.325) Gardner, John. “Concerning Permissive Sources and Gaps.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 8 (1988): 457–61.

Garner, Bryan A., ed. Black’s Law Dictionary. 8th ed. St. Paul, Minn.: Thomson/West, 2004.

Garvey, John H., and Amy V. Coney. “Catholic Judges in Capital Cases.” Marquette Law Review 81 (1998): 303–50.

Gert, Bernard. Morality: Its Nature and Justification. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Gettier, Edmund L. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23 (1963): 121–23.

Geyh, Charles Gardner. “Informal Methods of Judicial Discipline.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1993): 243–331.

Gilbert, Margaret. “Group Membership and Political Obligation.” The Monist 76 (1993): 119–31.

Gilbert, Margaret. Living Together: Rationality, Sociality, and Obligation. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996.

Gilbert, Margaret. On Social Facts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989.

Gilbert, Margaret. “Reconsidering the ‘Actual Contract’ Theory of Political Obligation.” Ethics 109 (1999): 236–60.

Gilbert, Margaret. Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject Theory. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.

Glover, Jonathan. “It Makes No Difference Whether or Not I Do It.” Applied Ethics. Ed. Peter Singer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990, 125–44.

Goldman, Alan H. The Moral Foundations of Professional Ethics. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1980.

Goldman, Alan H. Practical Rules: When We Need Them and When We Don’t. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Goldman, Alan H. “The Rationality of Complying with Rules: Paradox Resolved.” Ethics 116 (2006): 453–70.

Goodin, Robert E. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Goodwin, Barbara. Justice by Lottery. Hemel Hempstead, U.K.: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.

Graber, Mark A. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Graves, Rachel. “The Terri Schiavo Case; Schiavo Dies, but Debate Lives; Delay Insists Judges Must ‘Answer for Their Behavior.’” Houston Chronicle, April 1, 2005, A1.

Gray, Cynthia. “The Line between Legal Error and Judicial Misconduct: Balancing Judicial Independence and Accountability.” Hofstra Law Review 32 (2004): 1245–80.

Green, Leslie. The Authority of the State. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.

Greenawalt, Kent. Conflicts of Law and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.

Greenawalt, Kent. “Discretion and Judicial Decision: The Elusive Quest for the Fetters that Bind Judges.” Columbia Law Review 75 (1975): 359–99.

Greenawalt, Kent. Law and Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Greenawalt, Kent. “The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse.” Columbia Law Review 84 (1984): 1897–927.

Greenberg, Mark. “How Facts Make Law.” Legal Theory 10 (2004): 157–98.

(p.326) Grice, Paul. “Logic and Conversation.” Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989.

Griffen, Wendell L. “The Case for Religious Values in Judicial Decision-Making.” Marquette Law Review 81 (1998): 513–21.

Grimes, Warren S. “Hundred-Ton-Gun Control: Preserving Impeachment as the Exclusive Removal Mechanism for Federal Judges.” UCLA Law Review 38 (1991): 1209–55.

Gunther, Gerald. Learned Hand: The Man and the Judge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.

Haley, John O. “The Civil, Criminal and Disciplinary Liability of Judges.” American Journal of Comparative Law 54 (2006): 281–91.

Hall, Jerome. General Principles of Criminal Law. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960.

Hamburger, Philip. “Law and Judicial Duty.” George Washington Law Review 72 (2003): 1–41.

Hampton, Jean. “Free-Rider Problems in the Production of Collective Goods.” Economics and Philosophy 3 (1987): 245–73.

Hand, Learned. The Bill of Rights. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958.

Hardimon, Michael O. “Role Obligations.” Journal of Philosophy 91 (1994): 333–63.

Harris, John. Violence and Responsibility. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.

Hart, H. L. A. “Are There Any Natural Rights?” Philosophical Review 64 (1955): 175–91.

Hart, H. L. A. “Commands and Authoritative Legal Reasons.” Essays on Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.

Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. First published 1961.

Hart, H. L. A. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71 (1958): 593–629.

Hart, H. L. A., and Tony Honoré. Causation in the Law. Oxford: Clarendon, 1959.

Hasnas, John. “The Myth of the Rule of Law.” Wisconsin Law Review 1995 (1995): 199–233.

Hatch, Orrin, and Sam Brownback. “‘Extreme’ Judicial Activism.” Washington Times, Feb. 10, 2005, A19.

Hawkins, Keith, ed. The Uses of Discretion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Hellman, Deborah. “The Importance of Appearing Principled.” Arizona Law Review 37 (1995): 1108–51.

Henderson, Lynne. “Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law.” Indiana Law Journal 66 (1991): 379–456.

Henkin, Louis. “Privacy and Autonomy.” Columbia Law Review 74 (1974): 1410–33.

Heyd, David. Supererogation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

Higgins, Richard S., and Paul H. Rubin. “Judicial Discretion.” Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1980): 129–38.

Himma, Kenneth Einar. “Judicial Discretion and the Concept of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (1999): 71–82.

Hodges, Ann C. “Protecting Unionized Employees against Discrimination: The Fourth Circuit’s Misinterpretation of Supreme Court Precedent.” Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal 2 (1998): 123–74.

(p.327) Hoffer, Peter Charles. “Principled Discretion: Concealment, Conscience, and Chancellors.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 3 (1991): 53–82.

Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. Fundamental Legal Conceptions. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1919.

Honoré, Tony. “Must We Obey? Necessity as a Ground of Obligation.” Virginia Law Review 67 (1981): 39–61.

Hooker, Brad. Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Horton, Elizabeth M. “Selective Publication and the Authority of Precedent in the United States Courts of Appeals.” UCLA Law Review 42 (1995): 1691–778.

Horwitz, Morton J. “The Rule of Law: An Unqualified Human Good?” Yale Law Journal 86 (1977): 561–66.

Horwitz, Morton J. The Transformation of American Law: 1780–1860. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979.

Hulse, Carl. “Lawmakers Vow to Fight Judges’ Ruling on the Pledge.” New York Times, June 27, 2002, A20.

Hurd, Heidi M. “Justifiably Punishing the Justified.” Michigan Law Review 90 (1992): 2203–324.

Hurd, Heidi M. Moral Combat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Hurley, Paul. “Agent-Centered Restrictions: Clearing the Air of Paradox.” Ethics 108 (1997): 120–46.

Hurley, Susan. Natural Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

Husak, Douglas. Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Hutchinson, Allan C. Dwelling on the Threshold: Critical Essays on Modern Legal Thought. Toronto: Carswell, 1988.

Idleman, Scott C. “A Prudential Theory of Judicial Candor.” Texas Law Review 73 (1995): 1307–417.

Idleman, Scott C. “The Role of Religious Values in Judicial Decision Making.” Indiana Law Journal 68 (1993): 433–87.

Igneski, Violetta. “Distance, Determinacy and the Duty to Aid: A Reply to Kamm.” Law and Philosophy 20 (2001): 605–16.

Ingram, Peter. “Maintaining the Rule of Law.” Philosophical Quarterly 35 (1985): 359–81.

Isaacs, Tracy. “Collective Moral Responsibility and Collective Intention.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30 (2006): 59–73.

Jackson, Frank, and Michael Smith. “Absolutist Ethical Theories and Uncertainty.” Journal of Philosophy 103 (2006): 267–83.

Jacobson, Arthur J. “Publishing Dissent.” Washington and Lee Law Review 62 (2005): 1607–36.

Johnston, David, and Neil A. Lewis. “Ending Raids of Dispensers of Marijuana for Patients.” New York Times, March 19, 2009, A20.

Kadish, Mortimer R., and Sanford H. Kadish. Discretion to Disobey: A Study of Lawful Departures from Legal Rules. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1973.

Kagan, Shelly. The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

Kamm, F. M. Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities and Permissible Harm. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Kamm, F. M. Morality, Mortality: Rights, Duties, and Status. Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

(p.328) Kaplow, Louis. “Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis.” Duke Law Journal 42 (1992): 557–629.

Kaplow, Louis, and Steven Shavell. Fairness versus Welfare. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.

Karlan, Pamela S. “Two Concepts of Judicial Independence.” Southern California Law Review 72 (1999): 535–58.

Katz, Leo. “Incommensurable Choices and the Problem of Moral Ignorance.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 146 (1998): 1465–85.

Kauper, Paul G. “Penumbras, Peripheries, Emanations, Things Fundamental and Things Forgotten: The Griswold Case.” Michigan Law Review 64 (1965): 235–58.

Keith, Darrell L. “The Court’s Charge in Texas Medical Malpractice Cases.” Baylor Law Review 48 (1996): 675–814.

Kelsen, Hans. “On the Theory of Interpretation.” Legal Studies 10 (1990): 127–35.

Kennedy, Duncan. A Critique of Adjudication (Fin De Siècle). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.

Kennedy, Duncan. “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication.” Harvard Law Review 89 (1976): 1685–778.

Kennedy, Duncan. “Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology.” Journal of Legal Education 36 (1986): 518–62.

Klarman, Michael J. “Bush v. Gore through the Lens of Constitutional History.” California Law Review 89 (2001): 1721–65.

Klosko, George. “Parfit’s Moral Arithmetic and the Obligation to Obey the Law.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1990): 191–214.

Klosko, George. “Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation.” The Duty to Obey the Law: Selected Philosophical Readings. Ed. William A. Edmundson. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.

Klosko, George. The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1992.

Kmiec, Keenan D. “The Origin and Current Meanings of ‘Judicial Activism.’” California Law Review 92 (2004): 1441–77.

Kohlberg, Lawrence. Essays on Moral Development: The Philosophy of Moral Development. Vol. 1. New York: Harper & Row, 1981.

Kornhauser, Lewis A. “Adjudication by a Resource-Constrained Team: Hierarchy and Precedent in a Judicial System.” Southern California Law Review 68 (1995): 1605–29.

Kornhauser, Lewis A. “Modeling Collegial Courts I: Path Dependence.” International Review of Law and Economics 12 (1992): 169–85.

Kornhauser, Lewis A. “Modeling Collegial Courts II: Legal Doctrine.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 8 (1992): 441–70.

Korsgaard, Christine M. “Skepticism about Practical Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 83 (1986): 5–25.

Kramer, Larry D. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Kramer, Matthew. “How Moral Principles Can Enter into the Law.” Legal Theory 6 (2000): 83–108.

Kress, Ken. “Legal Indeterminacy.” California Law Review 77 (1989): 283–337.

Kress, Ken. “Why No Judge Should Be a Dworkinian Coherentist.” Texas Law Review 77 (1999): 1375–427.

Kretzmann, Norman. “Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex: Laws on Trial in Aquinas’ Court of Conscience.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 33 (1988): 99–122.

(p.329) Kroger, John R. “Supreme Court Equity, 1789–1835, and the History of American Judging.” Houston Law Review 34 (1998): 1425–86.

Kronman, Anthony. The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 1993.

Kuran, Timur, and Cass R. Sunstein. “Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation.” Stanford Law Review 51 (1999): 683–768.

Kutz, Christopher. Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Kutz, Christopher. “The Judicial Community.” Philosophical Issues 11 (2001): 442–69.

Lamond, Grant. “The Coerciveness of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (2000): 39–62.

Landers, Scott. “Wittgenstein, Realism, and CLS: Undermining Rule Scepticism.” Law and Philosophy 9 (1990): 177–203.

Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. “Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Law and Economics 19 (1976): 249–307.

Lefkowitz, David. “A Contractualist Defense of Democratic Authority.” Ratio Juris 18 (2005): 346–64.

Leiter, Brian. “Heidegger and the Theory of Adjudication.” Yale Law Journal 106 (1996): 253–82.

Leiter, Brian. “Legal Realism and Legal Positivism Reconsidered.” Ethics 111 (2001): 278–301.

Levenbook, Barbara B. “The Meaning of a Precedent.” Legal Theory 6 (2000): 185–240.

Levinson, Sanford. “The Confrontation of Religious Faith and Civil Religion: Catholics Becoming Justices.” DePaul Law Review 39 (1990): 1047–81.

Lewis, David. Convention. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1969.

Lewis, David. “The Punishment That Leaves Something to Chance.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (1989): 53–67.

Li, Xiaorong. “License to Coerce: Violence against Women, State Responsibility, and Legal Failures in China’s Family-Planning Program.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 8 (1996): 145–91.

Lightman, David. “Lawmakers Stand up to Court; Bipartisan Coalition Hopes to Dilute Impact of Eminent Domain Ruling.” Hartford Courant, July 1, 2005, A1.

Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government. Ed. C. B. McPherson. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980.

Lode, Eric. “Slippery Slope Arguments and Legal Reasoning.” California Law Review 87 (1999): 1469–543.

Luban, David. Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988.

Lubet, Steven. “Judicial Discipline and Judicial Independence.” Law and Contemporary Problems 61 (1998): 59–74.

Luce, R. Duncan, and Howard Raiffa. Games and Decisions. New York: Dover, 1989.

Lyons, David. “The Correlativity of Rights and Duties” Noûs 4 (1970): 45–55.

Lyons, David. “Derivability, Defensibility, and the Justification of Judicial Decisions.” Moral Aspects of Legal Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Lyons, David. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.

Lyons, David. “On Formal Justice.” Moral Aspects of Legal Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

(p.330) MacAdam, James I. “The Precepts of Justice.” Mind 77 (1968): 360–71.

Macchiarola, Frank J. “Why the Decision in Zelman Makes So Much Sense.” N.Y.U. Annual Survey of American Law 59 (2003): 459–67.

MacCormick, Neil. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon, 1978.

MacCormick, Neil. “Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers I.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46 (1972): 59–78.

Macey, Jonathan R. “The Internal and External Costs and Benefits of Stare Decisis.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 65 (1989): 93–112.

Mackie, J. L. “Clauses and Conditions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1965): 245–64.

Mackie, J. L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin, 1977.

Mackie, J. L. “Morality and the Retributive Emotions.” Persons and Values. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.

Mackie, J. L. “Obligations to Obey the Law.” Virginia Law Review 67 (1981): 143–58.

Manning, John F. “The Absurdity Doctrine.” Harvard Law Review 116 (2003): 2387–486.

Manning, John F. “Textualism and the Equity of the Statute.” Columbia Law Review 101 (2001): 1–127.

Marmor, Andrei. “The Rule of Law and Its Limits.” Law and Philosophy 23 (2004): 1–43.

Marmor, Andrei. “Should Like Cases Be Treated Alike?” Legal Theory 11 (2005): 27–38.

Mason, Elinor. “We Make No Promises.” Philosophical Studies 123 (2005): 33–46.

McCarthy, David. “Rights, Explanation, and Risks.” Ethics 107 (1997): 205–25.

McCarthy, Nancy. “Judge Faces Discipline: Commission Charge Unleashes Protest in Legal Community.” California State Bar Journal, August 1998, 1–3.

McDermott, Daniel. “The Permissibility of Punishment.” Law and Philosophy 20 (2001): 403–32.

McDowell, Gary. Equity and the Constitution: The Supreme Court, Equitable Relief, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.

McIntyre, Alison. “Doing Away with Double Effect.” Ethics 111 (2001): 219–55.

McKeever, Sean, and Michael Ridge. Principled Ethics: Generalism as a Regulative Ideal. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

McKerlie, Dennis. “Rights and Risk.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (1986): 239–51.

McMahan, Jeff. “Self-Defense and the Problem of the Innocent Attacker.” Ethics 104 (1994): 252–90.

McMahon, Christopher. Collective Rationality and Collective Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Mian, Emran. “The Curious Case of Exclusionary Reasons.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 15 (2002): 99–124.

Miceli, Thomas J., and Metin M. Cogel. “Reputation and Judicial Decision-Making.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23 (1994): 31–51.

Miller, Arthur R. “The Pretrial Rush to Judgment: Are the ‘Litigation Explosion,’ ‘Liability Crisis,’ and Efficiency Cliches Eroding Our Day in Court and Jury Trial Commitments?” New York University Law Review 78 (2003): 982–1134.

Miller, David. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Miller, Richard W. “Beneficence, Duty and Distance.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (2004): 357–83.

Miller, William Ian. Bloodtaking and Peacemaking: Feud, Law, and Society in Saga Iceland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.

(p.331) Mintz, Howard. “Disciplinary Case against Judge Raises Legal Uproar.” San Jose Mercury News July 11, 1998, 1A.

Mitchell, Allison. “Clinton Pressing Judge to Relent.” New York Times, March 22, 1996, A1.

Modak-Truran, Mark C. “Reenchanting the Law: The Religious Dimension of Judicial Decision Making.” Catholic University Law Review 53 (2004): 709–816.

Moore, Michael. “Law as a Functional Kind.” Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Ed. Robert P. George. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Moore, Michael S. “Authority, Law, and Razian Reasons.” Southern California Law Review 62 (1989): 827–96.

Moore, Michael S. “The Metaphysics of Causal Intervention.” California Law Review 88 (2000): 827–77.

Moore, Michael S. Placing Blame. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.

Murphy, Liam B. Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Murphy, Mark C. “Natural Law Jurisprudence.” Legal Theory 9 (2003): 241–67.

Murphy, Mark C. “Natural Law, Consent, and Political Obligation.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2001): 70–92.

Nagel, Thomas. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

Nagel, Thomas. “War and Massacre.” Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Newman, Jon O. “The Judge Baer Controversy.” Judicature 80 (1997): 156–64.

Nichols, Shaun. Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Noonan, John T., Jr. Persons and Masks of the Law: Cardozo, Holmes, Jefferson, Holmes, and Wythe as Makers of the Masks. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1976.

Noonan, John T. “The Religion of the Justice: Does It Affect Constitutional Decision Making?” Tulsa Law Review 42 (2007): 761–70.

Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.

Nussbaum, Martha C. “Emotion in the Language of Judging.” St. John’s Law Review 70 (1996): 23–30.

O’Hara, Erin. “Social Constraint or Implicit Collusion? Toward a Game Theoretic Analysis of Stare Decisis.” Seton Hall Law Review 24 (1993): 736–78.

Olowofoyeku, Abimbola A. Suing Judges: A Study of Judicial Immunity. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.

Orsi, Francesco. “Obligations of Nearness.” Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (2008): 1–21.

Osborn, Rebekah L. “Beliefs on the Bench: Recusal for Religious Reasons and the Model Code of Judicial Conduct.” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 19 (2006): 895–905.

Otsuka, Michael. “The Paradox of Group Beneficence.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (1991): 132–49.

Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.

Parker, Tom. “Alabama Justices Surrender to Judicial Activism.” Birmingham (Ala.) News, January 1, 2005, 4B.

Paulsen, Michael Stokes. “Accusing Justice: Some Variations on the Themes of Robert M. Cover’s Justice Accused.” Journal of Law and Religion 7 (1989): 33–97.

Peirce, Charles S. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Eds. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1932.

(p.332) Penzell, Abigail. “Note: Apology in the Context of Wrongful Conviction: Why the System Should Say It’s Sorry.” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 9 (2007): 145–61.

Perry, Stephen R. “Second-Order Reasons, Uncertainty, and Legal Theory.” Southern California Law Review 62 (1989): 913–94.

Pettit, Philip. The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Pettit, Philip. “The Consequentialist Can Recognise Rights.” Philosophical Quarterly 38 (1988): 42–55.

Pettit, Philip. “Responsibility Incorporated.” Ethics 117 (2007): 171–201.

Pettit, Philip. “Universality without Utilitarianism.” Mind 72 (1987): 74–82.

Plato. Crito. Trans. Hugh Tredennick. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin, 1959.

Posner, Eric. Law and Social Norms. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000.

Posner, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law. 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1992.

Posner, Richard A. The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 1999.

Posner, Richard A. “What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (the Same Thing Everybody Else Does).” Supreme Court Economic Review 3 (1993): 1–41.

Postema, Gerald J. Bentham and the Common Law Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

Postema, Gerald J. “Moral Responsibility in Professional Ethics.” New York University Law Review 55 (1980): 63–89.

Prichard, H. A. “The Obligation to Keep a Promise.” Moral Obligation. Oxford: Clarendon, 1949.

Prosser, William Lloyd, et al. Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts. 5th ed. St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1984.

Pryor, William H., Jr. “The Religious Faith and Judicial Duty of an American Catholic Judge.” Yale Law and Policy Review 24 (2006): 347–62.

Quinn, Warren. “Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (1989): 334–51.

Quinn, Warren. “The Right to Threaten and the Right to Punish.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1985): 327–73.

Rabin, Edward H. “Symposium: The Revolution in Residential Landlord-Tenant Law: Causes and Consequences.” Cornell Law Review 69 (1984): 517–84.

Radbruch, Gustav. “Gesetzliches Unrecht Und Übergesetzliches Recht.” Süddeutsche Juristen-Zeitung 1 (1946): 105–8. Translated as “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946).” Trans. Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (2006): 1–11.

Radin, Margaret Jane. “Reconsidering the Rule of Law.” Boston University Law Review 69 (1992): 781–819.

Raftery, William E. “The Legislatures, the Ballot Boxes, and the Courts.” Court Review 43 (2006): 102–7.

Railton, Peter. “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (1984): 134–71.

Railton, Peter. “Locke, Stock, and Peril: Natural Property Rights, Pollution, and Risk.” To Breathe Freely. Ed. Mary Gibson. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1985.

Rawls, John. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” University of Chicago Law Review 64 (1997): 765–807.

(p.333) Rawls, John. “Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play.” Law and Philosophy: A Symposium. Ed. Sidney Hook. New York: New York University Press, 1964.

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

Rawls, Phillip. “Parker ‘Attack’ Irks Fellow State Justice.” Huntsville Times (Alabama), January 16, 2006, 2B.

Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979.

Raz, Joseph. “Law and Value in Adjudication.” The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979.

Raz, Joseph. “Legal Positivism and the Sources of Law.” The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979.

Raz, Joseph. “Legal Reasons, Sources, and Gaps.” The Authority of Law: Essays in Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979.

Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.

Raz, Joseph. “The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition.” Ethics in the Public Domain. Rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.

Raz, Joseph. Practical Reason and Norms. 1970. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.

Raz, Joseph. “Promises in Morality and Law.” Rev. of P. S. Atiyah, Promises, Morals, and Law. Harvard Law Review 95 (1982): 916–38.

Raz, Joseph. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtue.” The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979.

Regan, Donald H. “Authority and Value: Reflections on Raz’s Morality of Freedom.” Southern California Law Review 62 (1989): 995–1095.

Reibetanz (now Moreau), Sophia. “A Problem for the Doctrine of Double Effect.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (1998): 217–23.

Reynolds, William L., and William M. Richman. “The Non-Precedential Precedent—Limited Publication and No-Citation Rules in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Columbia Law Review 78 (1978): 1167–208.

Richardson, Henry S. “Review of Alan H. Goldman, Practical Rules.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2002.

Richardson, Henry S. “Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (1990): 279–310.

Ridge, Michael. “Reasons for Action: Agent-Neutral vs. Agent-Relative.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, August 11, 2005. Retrieved July 21, 2009, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasons-agent/.

Ring, Wilson. “Vt. Judge Criticized for Molester Sentence.” Associated Press Online, January 10, 2006.

Rizzo, Mario J., and Douglas Glen Whitman. “The Camel’s Nose Is under the Tent: Rules, Theories, and Slippery Slopes.” UCLA Law Review 51 (2003): 539–92.

Roberts, Thomas E. “Facial Takings Claims under Agins-Nectow: A Procedural Loose End.” Hawaii Law Review 24 (2002): 623–55.

Robinson, Paul H. “The A.L.I.’s Proposed Distributive Principle of ‘Limiting Retributivism’: Does It Mean in Practice Anything Other than Pure Desert?” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 7 (2003): 3–15.

Ross, W.D. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon, 1930.

Roth, Abraham Sesshu. “Shared Agency and Contralateral Commitments.” Philosophical Review 113 (2004): 359–410.

Rovane, Carol. The Bounds of Agency. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.

(p.334) Sachs, Stephen E. “Saving Toby: Extortion, Blackmail, and the Right to Destroy.” Yale Law and Policy Review 24 (2006): 251–61.

Sagoff, Mark. “Controlling Global Climate: The Debate over Pollution Trading.” Philosophical Dimensions of Public Policy. Ed. Verna V. Gehring. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 2002.

Salmon, Marylynn. Women and the Law of Property in Early America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1986.

Sankar, Sambhav N. “Disciplining the Professional Judge.” California Law Review 88 (2000): 1233–80.

Saphire, Richard B. “Religion and Recusal.” Marquette Law Review 81 (1998): 351–63.

Sartorius, Rolf. Individual Conduct and Social Norms. Encino, Calif.: Dickenson, 1975.

Sartorius, Rolf. “Political Authority and Political Obligation.” Virginia Law Review 67 (1981): 3–17.

Scalia, Antonin. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997.

Scalia, Antonin. “Originalism: The Lesser Evil.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 57 (1989): 849–65.

Scalia, Antonin. “The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules.” University of Chicago Law Review 56 (1989): 1175–88.

Scanlon, T. M. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 1998.

Schapiro, Tamar. “Compliance, Complicity, and the Nature of Nonideal Conditions.” Journal of Philosophy 100 (2003): 329–55.

Schauer, Frederick. “Easy Cases.” Southern California Law Review 58 (1985): 399–440.

Schauer, Frederick. “Incentives, Reputation, and the Inglorious Determinants of Judicial Behavior.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 68 (1999): 615–36.

Schauer, Frederick. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Schauer, Frederick. “Precedent.” Stanford Law Review 29 (1987): 571–605.

Schauer, Frederick. “Slippery Slopes.” Harvard Law Review 99 (1985): 361–83.

Scheffler, Samuel. The Rejection of Consequentialism. 1982. Revised ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

Schmidtz, David. “Islands in a Sea of Obligation: Limits of the Duty to Rescue.” Law and Philosophy 19 (2000): 683–705.

Searle, John R. “Collective Intentions and Intentional Actions.” Intentions in Communication. Eds. Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990.

Seelye, Katharine Q. “A Get-Tough Message at California’s Death Row.” New York Times, March 24, 1996, 29.

Shaman, Jeffrey M. “Judicial Ethics.” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 2 (1988): 1–20.

Shapiro, David. “In Defense of Judicial Candor.” Harvard Law Review 100 (1995): 731–50.

Shapiro, Ian, ed. The Rule of Law: Nomos XXXVI. New York: New York University Press, 1994.

Shapiro, Martin. “Judges as Liars.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 17 (1994): 155–56.

Shapiro, Scott J. “Judicial Can’t.” Noûs 35, Supp. 1 (2001): 530–57.

(p.335) Shapiro, Scott J. “Law, Morality, and the Guidance of Conduct.” Legal Theory 6 (2000): 127–70.

Shapiro, Scott J. “Law, Plans, and Practical Reason.” Legal Theory 8 (2002): 387–441.

Shapiro, Scott J. “On Hart’s Way Out.” Hart’s Postscript. Ed. Jules Coleman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Shepard, Sam. Fool for Love. New York: Dramatists Play Service, 1984.

Sher, George. Approximate Justice: Studies in Non-Ideal Theory. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.

Sherrer, Hans. “The Complicity of Judges in the Generation of Wrongful Convictions.” Northern Kentucky Law Review 30 (2003): 539–83.

Shklar, Judith N. “Political Theory and the Rule of Law.” The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology. Eds. Allan C. Hutchinson and Patrick Monahan. Toronto: Carswell, 1987.

Sidgwick, Henry. The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1981. First published 1874.

Siegel, Neil S. “The Virtue of Judicial Statesmanship.” Texas Law Review 86 (2008): 959–1032.

Siegel, Neil S. “Why President Bush Should Not Take the 5th; Judges Who Ignore Law Are Possible Court Candidates.” Houston Chronicle, June 17, 2005, B11.

Simmons, A. John. “Locke and the Right to Punish.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (1991): 311–49.

Simmons, A. John. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.

Simon, Dan. “The Double-Consciousness of Judging: The Problematic Legacy of Cardozo.” Oregon Law Review 79 (2000): 1033–80.

Simon, William H. The Practice of Justice: A Theory of Lawyers’ Ethics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.

Simon, William H. “Should Lawyers Obey the Law?” William & Mary Law Review 38 (1996): 217–53.

Singer, Peter. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1972): 229–43

Smith, M. B. E. “Do Appellate Courts Regularly Cheat?” Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (1997): 11–20.

Smith, M. B. E. “Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law?” Yale Law Journal 82 (1973): 950–76.

Smith, M. B. E. “May Judges Ever Nullify the Law?” Notre Dame Law Review 74 (1999): 1657–71.

Smith, Matthew Noah. “The Law as a Social Practice: Are Shared Activities at the Foundations of Law?” Legal Theory 12 (2006): 265–92.

Smith, Steven D. “Why Should Courts Obey the Law?” Georgetown Law Journal 77 (1988): 113–64.

Solum, Lawrence B. “Equity and the Rule of Law.” The Rule of Law. Ed. Ian Shapiro. New York: New York University Press, 1994.

Solum, Lawrence B. “Faith and Justice.” DePaul Law Review 39 (1990): 1083–106.

Solum, Lawrence B. “Indeterminacy.” A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Ed. Dennis Patterson. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.

Solum, Lawrence B. “On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma.” University of Chicago Law Review 54 (1987): 462–503.

Songer, Donald R., Martha Humphries Ginn, and Tammy A. Sarver. “Do Judges Follow the Law When There Is No Fear of Reversal?” Justice System Journal 24 (2003): 137–61.

(p.336) Soper, Philip. The Ethics of Deference: Learning from Law’s Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Soper, Philip. A Theory of Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984.

Sowell, Thomas. “Real Judicial Crisis Is Judges Who Ignore the Law.” The Post and Courier (Charleston, S.C.), January 14, 1998, A11.

Stark, Cynthia A. “Decision Procedures, Standards of Rightness and Impartiality.” Noûs 31 (1997): 478–95.

Stavropoulos, Nicos. Objectivity in Law. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.

Stern, Gerald. “Is Judicial Discipline in New York State a Threat to Judicial Independence?” Pace Law Review 7 (1987): 291–388.

Strauss, David A. “The Common Law Genius of the Warren Court.” William & Mary Law Review 49 (2007): 845–79.

Strauss, David A. “Little Rock and the Legacy of Brown.” Saint Louis Law Journal 52 (2008): 1065–86.

Suleiman, Ramzi. “Provision of Step-Level Public Goods under Uncertainty.” Rationality and Society 9 (1997): 163–87.

Sullivan, Kathleen M. “The Justices of Rules and Standards.” Harvard Law Review 106 (1992): 22–123.

Sulmasy, Daniel P. “What Is an Oath and Why Should a Physician Swear One?” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1999): 329–46.

Summers, Robert S. “The Principles of the Rule of Law.” Notre Dame Law Review 74 (1999): 1691–712.

Sunstein, Cass R. “Moral Heuristics.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2005): 531–73.

Sunstein, Cass R. “On Academic Fads and Fashions.” Michigan Law Review 99 (2001): 1251.

Sunstein, Cass R. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Sunstein, Cass R. “The Supreme Court 1995 Term: Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided.” Harvard Law Review 110 (1996): 6–101.

Sunstein, Cass R. “What Did Lawrence Hold? Of Autonomy, Desuetude, Sexuality, and Marriage.” Supreme Court Review (2003): 27–74.

Sunstein, Cass R. Why Societies Need Dissent. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003.

Sunstein, Cass R., and Richard A. Epstein, eds. The Vote: Bush, Gore, and the Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.

Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. “Deterring Murder: A Reply.” Stanford Law Review 58 (2006): 847–57.

“Symposium: Bush v. Gore.” University of Chicago Law Review 68 (2001): 613–791.

Sypnowich, Christine. “Utopia and the Rule of Law.” Recrafting the Rule of Law. Ed. David Dyzenhaus. Oxford: Hart, 1999.

Talley, Eric. “Precedential Cascades: An Appraisal.” Southern California Law Review 73 (1999): 87–137.

Tamanaha, Brian Z. Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. Law in Context. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Tamanaha, Brian Z. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Temkin, Larry S. “Rethinking the Good, Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasons.” Reading Parfit. Ed. Jonathan Dancy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.

(p.337) Ten, C. L. “Positive Retributivism.” Social Philosophy and Policy 7 (1990): 194–208.

Thayer, James B. “The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law.” Harvard Law Review 7 (1893): 129–56.

Thomson, Judith Jarvis. Rights, Restitution, and Risk. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986.

Thomson, Judith Jarvis. “Self-Defense.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (1991): 283–310.

Tuomela, Raimo. The Importance of Us. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1995.

Tuomela, Raimo, and Kaarlo Miller. “We-Intentions.” Philosophical Studies 53 (1988): 115–37.

Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999.

Tyler, Tom R. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1990.

Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. Law in Modern Society. New York: Free Press, 1976.

Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. What Should Legal Analysis Become? London: Verso, 1996.

Velleman, J. David. “How to Share an Intention.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1997): 29–50.

Velleman, J. David. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Vermeule, Adrian. Judging under Uncertainty: An Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006.

Vila, Marisa Iglesias. Facing Judicial Discretion: Legal Knowledge and Right Answers Revisited. Boston: Kluwer, 2001.

Volcansek, Mary L. Judicial Impeachment: None Called for Justice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1993.

Volokh, Eugene. “The Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope.” Harvard Law Review 116 (2003): 1026–137.

Wald, Patricia M. “The Rhetoric of Results and the Results of Rhetoric: Judicial Writings.” University of Chicago Law Review 62 (1995): 1371–419.

Wald, Patricia M. “Violence under the Law: A Judge’s Perspective.” Law’s Violence. Eds. Austin Sarat and Thomas R. Kearns. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992.

Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case against Judicial Review.” Yale Law Journal 115 (2006): 1346–406.

Waldron, Jeremy. “Kant’s Legal Positivism.” Harvard Law Review 109 (1996): 1535–66.

Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Waldron, Jeremy. “The Rule of Law in Contemporary Liberal Theory.” Ratio Juris 2 (1989): 79–96.

Waldron, Jeremy. “Who Is My Neighbor? Humanity and Proximity.” Monist 86 (2003): 333–54.

Walen, Alec. “Reasonable Illegal Force: Justice and Legitimacy in a Pluralistic, Liberal Society.” Ethics 111 (2001): 344–73.

Walker, A. D. M. “Political Obligation and the Argument from Gratitude.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (1988): 191–211.

Walton, Douglas. Slippery Slope Arguments. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992.

Waluchow, W. J. “Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis.” Legal Theory 6 (2000): 45–81.

Waluchow, W. J. Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.

(p.338) Waluchow, W. J. “Indeterminacy.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 9 (1996): 397–409.

Wasserstrom, Richard A. The Judicial Decision: Toward a Theory of Legal Justification. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1961.

Wasserstrom, Richard A. “Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues.” Human Rights 5 (1975): 2–15.

Wasserstrom, Richard A. “The Obligation to Obey the Law.” UCLA Law Review 10 (1963): 780–807.

Wechsler, Herbert. “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law.” Harvard Law Review 73 (1959): 1–35.

Weick, Karl E. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1995.

Weinstein, Jack B. “Every Day Is a Good Day for a Judge to Lay Down His Professional Life for Justice.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 32 (2004): 131–70.

Wellman, Christopher Heath. “Liberalism, Samaritanism, and Political Obligation.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (1996): 211–37.

Wenar, Leif. “The Nature of Rights.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2005): 223–52.

West, Robin. “The Lawless Adjudicator.” Cardozo Law Review 26 (2005): 2253–61.

Westen, Peter. Speaking of Equality: An Analysis of the Rhetorical Force of “Equality” in Moral and Legal Discourse. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990.

White, David. “Parker Says He’s Willing to Defy High Court.” Birmingham (Ala.) News, May 26, 2006, 1C.

Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985.

Williams, Bernard. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Winston, Ken. “On Treating Like Cases Alike.” California Law Review 62 (1974): 1–39.

Wolf, Arthur P., and William H. Durham, eds. Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo: The State of Knowledge at the Turn of the Century. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2005.

Wolf, Susan. “Morality and Partiality.” Philosophical Perspectives 6 (1992): 243–59.

Wolff, Robert Paul. In Defense of Anarchism. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.

Woodard, Calvin. “Joseph Story and American Equity.” Washington and Lee Law Review 45 (1988): 623–44.

Yeazell, Stephen C. “Good Judging and Good Judgment.” Court Review 35 (1998): 8–10.

Zapf, Christian, and Eben Moglen. “Linguistic Indeterminacy and the Rule of Law: On the Perils of Misunderstanding Wittgenstein.” Georgetown Law Journal 84 (1996): 485–520.

Zimmerman, Michael J. “Intervening Agents and Moral Responsibility.” Philosophical Quarterly 35 (1985): 347–58.

Zipursky, Benjamin C. “The Model of Social Facts.” Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Ed. Jules Coleman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.