Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nita A. Farahany

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780195340525

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340525.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 November 2017

Behavioral Genetics Evidence in Criminal Cases: 1994–2007

Behavioral Genetics Evidence in Criminal Cases: 1994–2007

Chapter:
(p.317) 10 Behavioral Genetics Evidence in Criminal Cases: 1994–2007
Source:
The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law
Author(s):

Deborah W. Denno

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340525.003.0010

This chapter addresses the question: how have courts and litigators treated behavioral genetics evidence in criminal cases between 1994 and 2007. The chapter proceeds as follows. Part II briefly reviews the facts and legal arguments in the Stephen Mobley case. Part III addresses the primary issues that concerned the court in Mobley, noting that many of the reasons for the controversy over the potential use of behavioral genetics evidence in 1994 remain the same today. Part IV discusses the forty-eight behavioral genetics and crime cases occurring between 1994 and 2007, during the time Mobley and Schriro v. Landrigan spurred the topical dispute. Part V concludes that contrary to some commentators' warnings during the Mobley appeal, the last thirteen years have not revealed a legally irresponsible application of behavioral genetics factors in criminal cases. Rather, courts continue to regard behavioral genetics variables skeptically, and society still embraces the same political and moral concerns over the role of such information. At the same time, courts have failed to provide sound and conceptually consistent reasons either for denying defendants' offers of behavioral genetics evidence or for viewing such evidence in the worst light for defendants.

Keywords:   criminal justice system, Stephen Mobley, behavioral genomics, Schriro v. Landrigan

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .