Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Judicial Restraint in America$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Evan Tsen Lee

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780195340341

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340341.001.0001

From Protestant Idealism to Scientific Pragmatism

Chapter:
(p. 41 ) 3. From Protestant Idealism to Scientific Pragmatism
Source:
Judicial Restraint in America
Author(s):

Evan Tsen Lee

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340341.003.0003

This chapter argues that the clash between Protestant idealism and secular or scientific pragmatism that was evident during the American culture wars had a direct counterpart in American jurisprudence. Protestant idealism corresponded closely to what has been variously labeled the “classical orthodoxy” or “Langdellian formalism.” Scientific pragmatism more or less corresponded to a movement that called itself “Sociological Jurisprudence” and a later movement known as “Legal Realism.” The struggle between classical legal orthodoxy on the one hand and Sociological Jurisprudence and Legal Realism on the other profoundly shaped the mores of judicial review and helped produce the modern standing doctrine.

Keywords:   Protestants, Protestant idealism, scientific pragmatism, American jurisprudence, Sociological Jurisprudence, Legal Realism, classical orthodoxy, Langdellian formalism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .