Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Developing and Validating Rapid Assessment Instruments$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Neil Abell, David W. Springer, and Akihito Kamata

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780195333367

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333367.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 11 December 2018

Establishing Evidence of Scale Score Validity

Establishing Evidence of Scale Score Validity

Chapter:
(p.98) 5 Establishing Evidence of Scale Score Validity
Source:
Developing and Validating Rapid Assessment Instruments
Author(s):

Neil Abell

David W. Springer

Akihito Kamata

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333367.003.0005

This chapter deconstructs the multiple forms of evidence combined to establish the construct validity of a measure. Some forms (i.e., face and content validity) are shown to be fundamentally intuitive or conceptual, though minimal quantification may apply. Recruitment of expert panelists is discussed, and illustrations are provided for summarizing and interpreting both qualitative and quantitative responses. Convergent and discriminant construct validity are traced to their early roots in psychometric theory, and presented as opposite sides of a common coin approximating the accuracy of new scale and test scores. Criterion-related validity is overviewed in both its concurrent and predictive forms, with consideration for the illusive nature of “gold standards” traditionally incorporated in such techniques. An overview of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis as a tool for gauging scale sensitivity and specificity is provided.

Keywords:   face, content, convergent, discriminant, construct, predictive, concurrent, criterion validity evidence, receiver operating characteristics, ROC, sensitivity

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .