Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Al-Ghazali's Philosophical Theology$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Frank Griffel

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780195331622

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331622.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 December 2018

The Reconciliation of Reason and Revelation through the “Rule of Interpretation” (Qānūn al-taʾwīl)

The Reconciliation of Reason and Revelation through the “Rule of Interpretation” (Qānūn al-taʾwīl)

Chapter:
(p.111) 4 The Reconciliation of Reason and Revelation through the “Rule of Interpretation” (Qānūn al-taʾwīl)
Source:
Al-Ghazali's Philosophical Theology
Author(s):

Frank Griffel (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331622.003.0005

Al-Ghazali’s inquiry into the epistemological status of philosophical arguments in his Incoherence of the Philosophers is highly relevant for his legal assessment of the philosophical movement. He accepts the principle that any teaching that goes against the outward wording of the Muslim revelation (Qur’an and hadith) and that can successfully be demonstrated forces the Muslim scholar to adopt an allegorical interpretation of revelation. This “Rule of Interpretation” leads directly into a discussion of what can and what cannot be demonstrated. Once the scholars have achieved clarity about this issue through their adaptation of Aristotelian logic, so al-Ghazali, there will no longer be disputes about what should be accepted on the authority of reason (al-ma’qul) and what on the authority of revelation (al-manqul). The universal adaptation of syllogistic logic in Islam will make an end to all doctrinal disputes.

Keywords:   interpretation, reason and revelation, apostasy, Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, Ibn Ghaylan al-Balkhi, Aristotelian logic, syllogistic logic, doctrinal disputes

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .