This chapter defines and compares systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Systematic reviews carefully locate relevant evidence and appraise study qualities, while meta-analyses provide quantitative summaries of evidence, showing central trends, variations, and possible explanations for differences in results across studies. The advantages and disadvantages of these review methodologies are discussed, along with appropriate applications and quality standards.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.