Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Anselm$

Sandra Visser and Thomas Williams

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780195309386

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309386.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 27 February 2017

(p.293) References

(p.293) References

Source:
Anselm
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

ABBREVIATIONS

References in endnotes to the Latin text of Anselm use the following abbreviations:

  • AR

    Anselm's Reply to Gaunilo

  • CDH

    Cur Deus Homo

  • DC

    De concordia

  • DCD

    De casu diaboli (On the Fall of the Devil)

  • DCV

    De conceptu virginali et de originali peccato (On the Virginal Conception, and On Original Sin)

  • DG

    De grammatico

  • DIV

    De incarnatione Verbi (On the Incarnation of the Word)

  • DLA

    De libertate arbitrii (On Freedom of Choice)

  • DPSS

    De processione Spiritus Sancti (On the Procession of the Holy Spirit)

  • DV

    De veritate (On Truth)

  • GR

    Gaunilo's Reply on Behalf of the Fool

  • LF

    Lambeth Fragments

  • M

    Monologion

  • P

    Proslogion

Parenthetical citations by volume and page number refer to the critical edition of F. S. Schmitt, S. Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Opera Omnia (Stuttgart–Bad Canstatt: Friedrich Fromann Verlag, 1968). Parenthetical citations by page (p.294) number alone refer to Schmitt's edition of the Lambeth Fragments in “Ein neues unvollendetes Werk des hl. Anselm von Canterbury,” Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters 33, no. 3 (1936): 22–43.

Adams, Marilyn McCord. “Anselm on Faith and Reason.” In Davies and Leftow, 32–60.

———. “saint Anselm's Theory of Truth.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 1 (1990): 353–72.

Anscombe, G. E. M. “Russell or Anselm?” Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1993): 500–504.

———. “Why Anselm's Proof in the Proslogion Is Not an Ontological Argument.” Thoreau Quarterly 17 (1985): 32–40.

Augustine. De magistro. In Contra academicos. De beata vita. De ordine. Demagistro. De libero arbitrio, ed. W. M. Green and K.-D. Daur. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 1970.

———. De trinitate, ed. W. J. Mountain and F. Glorie. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 1968.

Barnes, Jonathan. The Ontological Argument. London: Macmillan, 1972.

Barth, Karl. Anselm: Fides Quaerens Intellectum. Richmond, Va.: John Knox Press, 1960.

Book of Common Prayer. New York: Church Publishing, 1979.

Brower, Jeffrey E. “Anselm on Ethics.” In Davies and Leftow, 222–56.

Brown, David. “Anselm on Atonement.” In Davies and Leftow, 279–302.

———. “Necessary and Fitting’ Reasons in Christian Theology.” In The Rationality of Religious Belief, ed. W. Abraham and S. Holtzer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

Campbell, Richard. “The Conceptual Roots of Anselm's Soteriology.” In Anselm: Aosta, Bec and Canterbury, ed. D. E. Luscombe and G. R. Evans, 256–63. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.

———. From Belief to Understanding. Canberra: ANU Press, 1976.

Colish, Marcia L. “St. Anselm's Philosophy of Language Reconsidered.” Anselm Studies I (1983): 125–41.

Cunning, David. “Descartes’ Modal Metaphysics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (Fall 2006). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/descartes-modaL/

Davies, Brian, and Brian Leftow, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Deme, Daniel. The Christology of Anselm of Canterbury. Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2003.

Eadmer. Historia novorum in Anglia, ed. Martin Rule. Wiesbaden: Kraus Reprint, 1965.

(p.295) Ekenberg, Tomas. Falling Freely: Anselm of Canterbury on the Will. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet, 2005.

Evans, G. R. Anselm. Outstanding Christian Thinkers. Wilton, Conn.: Morehouse-Barlow, 1989.

———. Anselm and a New Generation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.

———. “Anselm's Life, Works, and Immediate Influence.” In Davies and Leftow, 5–31.

———. “St. Anselm's Images of Trinity,” Journal of Theological Studies 27 (1976): 46–57.

Fairweather, Eugene R. “Truth, Justice, and Moral Responsibility in the Thought of St. Anselm.” In L’homme et son destin d’après les penseurs du moyen âge. Actes du premier congrès internationale de philosophie médiévale, 385–91. Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1960.

Fischer, John Martin. God, Foreknowledge, and Freedom. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989.

Gasper, Giles E. M. Anselm of Canterbury and His Theological Inheritance. Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2004.

Gracia, Jorge J. E., and J. J. Sanford. “Ratio quaerens beatitudinem: Anselm on Rationality and Happiness.” In Rationality and Happiness: From the Ancients to the Early Medievals, ed. J. Yu and Jorge J. E. Gracia. New York: University of Rochester Press, 2003.

Henry, Desmond Paul. The Logic of Saint Anselm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.

Hestevold, H. S. “The Anselmian Single-Divine-Attribute Doctrine.” Religious Studies 29 (1993): 63–77.

Holopainen, Toivo. Dialectic and Theology in the Eleventh Century. Leiden: Brill, 1996.

Hopkins, Jasper. A Companion to the Study of St. Anselm. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1972.

———. A New, Interpretive Translation of St. Anselm's Monologion and Proslogion. Minneapolis: The Arthur J. Banning Press, 1986.

———. “The Philosophy of Anselm.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (2005): 745–53.

Hursthouse, Rosalind. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Kent, Bonnie D. Virtues of the Will: The Transformation of Ethics in the Late Thirteenth Century. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1985.

Keshgegian, Flora A. “The Scandal of the Cross: Revisiting Anselm and His Feminist Critics.” Anglican Theological Review 82 (2000): 475–92.

(p.296) King, Peter. “Anselm's Intentional Argument.” History of Philosophy Quarterly I (1984): 147–65.

———. “Anselm's Philosophy of Language.” In Davies and Leftow, 84–110.

Klima, Gyula. “Saint Anselm's Proof: A Problem of Reference, Intentional Identity and Mutual Understanding.” In Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times, ed. G. Holmström-Hintikka. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.

———. “Conceptual Closure in Anselm's Proof: Reply to Tony Roark.” History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (2003): 131–34.

Knuuttila, Simo. “Anselm on Modality.” In Davies and Leftow, 111–31.

———. Modalities in Medieval Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1993.

Lang, U. M. “Anhypostatos-Enhypostatos: Church Fathers, Protestant Orthodoxy and Karl Barth.” Journal of Theological Studies NS 49 (1998): 630–57.

Leftow, Brian. “Anselm on the Cost of Salvation.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (1997): 73–92.

———. “Anselm on the Necessity of the Incarnation,” Religious Studies 31 (1995): 167–85.

———. “Anselm's Neglected Argument.” Philosophy 77 (2002): 331–47.

———. “Anselm's Perfect-Being Theology.” In Davies and Leftow, 132–56.

———. “Not So Anselmian.” Faith and Philosophy, forthcoming.

Lewis, Delmas. “Eternity, Time, and Tenselessness.” Faith and Philosophy 5 (1988): 72–86.

Luscombe, D. E., and G. R. Evans, eds. Anselm: Aosta, Bec, and Canterbury. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.

Malcolm, Norman. “Anselm's Ontological Arguments.” Philosophical Review 69 (1960): 41–62.

Mann, William E. “Anselm on the Trinity.” In Davies and Leftow, 257–78.

———. “Natural and Supernatural Knowledge of God.” In The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus, ed. Thomas Williams, 238–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Lewis, Delmas. “Eternity, Time, and Tenselessness.” Faith and Philosophy 5 (1988): 72–86.

Luscombe, D. E., and G. R. Evans, eds. Anselm: Aosta, Bec, and Canterbury. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.

Malcolm, Norman. “Anselm's Ontological Arguments.” Philosophical Review 69 (1960): 41–62.

Mann, William E. “Anselm on the Trinity.” In Davies and Leftow, 257–78.

———. “Natural and Supernatural Knowledge of God.” In The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus, ed. Thomas Williams, 238–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

———. “The Perfect Island.” Mind 85 (1976): 417–21.

———. “Simplicity and Properties: A Reply to Morris,” Religious Studies 22 (1986): 343–53.

Marenbon, John. Early Medieval Philosophy (480–1150). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.

———. Review of Katherin A. Rogers, The Anselmian Approach to God and Creation and The Neoplatonic Metaphysics and Epistemology of Anselm of Canterbury. Religious Studies 36 (2000): 498–504.

McIntyre, John. St. Anselm and His Critics: A Re-interpretation of the Cur Deus Homo. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1954.

(p.297) Merricks, Trenton. “On the Incompatibility of Enduring and Perduring Entities.” Mind 104 (1995): 523–41.

Milbank, John. “The Second Difference: A Trinitarianism Without Reserve.” Modern Theology 2 (1986): 213–34.

Millican, Peter. “The One Fatal Flaw in Anselm's Argument.” Mind 113 (2004): 437–476.

Morris, Thomas V. “Perfect Being Theology,” Noûs 21 (1987): 19–30.

Murray, Michael J., and Michael Rea. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Priest, Stephen. “Reality and Existence in Anselm.” Heythrop Journal 41 (2000): 461–62.

Resnick, I. M. Divine Power and Possibility in St. Peter Damian's De divina omnipotentia. Leiden: Brill, 1992.

Roark, Tony. “Conceptual Closure in Anselm's Proof.” History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (2003): 1–14.

Rogers, Katherin A. “Anselm on Eudaemonism and the Hierarchical Structure of Moral Choice.” Religious Studies 41 (2005): 249–268.

———. “Anselmian Eternalism.” Faith and Philosophy 24 (2007): 3–27.

———. The Neoplatonic Metaphysics and Epistemology of Anselm of Canterbury. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1997.

———. Perfect Being Theology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000.

Rowe, William L. Can God Be Free? Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.

Serene, Eileen F. “Anselm's Modal Conceptions.” In Reforging the Great Chain of Being (Synthese Historical Library 20), ed. Simo Knuuttila. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981.

———. “Anselmian Agency in the Lambeth Fragments: A Medieval Perspective on the Theory of Action.” Anselm Studies 1 (1983): 143–156.

Southern, R. W. Anselm and His Biographer, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

———, ed. The Life of St Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury, by Eadmer. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.

———. Saint Anselm: A Portrait in Landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Spade, Paul Vincent. “Ambiguity in Anselm.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (1976): 433–45.

———. Thoughts, Words, and Things: An Introduction to Late Mediaeval Logic and Semantic Theory. http://pvspade.com/Logic/docs/thoughts1_1a.pdf

Thomas Aquinas. Summa contra gentiles. Rome: Marietti, 1946.

van Inwagen, Peter. “And Yet They Are Not Three Gods, But One God.” Reprinted in God, Knowledge, and Mystery: Essays in Philosophical Theology, 222–59. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.

(p.298) Vaughn, Sally. Anselm of Bec and Robert of Meulan: The Innocence of the Dove and the Wisdom of the Serpent. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.

Viger, Christopher. “St. Anselm's Ontological Argument Succumbs to Russell's Paradox.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (2002): 123–28.

Weidemann, Hermann. “Anselm und die Insel: Das ontologische Argument im Spiegel surrealistischer Kunst.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (2004): 1–20.

Wierenga, Edward. “Anselm on Omnipotence.” The New Scholasticism 62 (1988): 30–41.

Williams, Thomas. “Describing God.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, ed. Robert C. Pasnau, forthcoming.

———. “The Doctrine of Univocity Is True and Salutary.” Modern Theology 21 (2005): 575–85.

———. “Gaunilo.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd ed., ed. Donald Borchert. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2006.

———. “Saint Anselm.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2006). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2006/entries/anselm

———. “God Who Sows the Seed and Gives the Growth: Anselm's Theology of the Holy Spirit.” Anglican Theological Review 89 (2007): 611–27.

———, trans. Anselm: Three Philosophical Dialogues. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2002.

———, trans. Anselm: Basic Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2007.

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. “In Defense of Gaunilo's Defense of the Fool.” In Christian Perspectives on Religious Knowledge, ed. C. Stephen Evans and Merold Westphal, 87–111. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1993.