The Hazards of Claiming to Have Solved the Hard Problem of Free Will
Although much recent work, both theoretical and empirical, has questioned the existence of conscious free will, this chapter offers two reasons for caution in drawing strong conclusions about the non-existence of free will. First, little existing scientific evidence directly addresses the hard problem of free will, namely, whether it is possible for subjective experience to have a causal impact on action, and therefore, firm conclusions may be premature. Second, claims that science has ruled out the possibility of free will could have negative social consequences. Findings from two experiments demonstrate that people exposed to arguments dismissing free will are more likely to engage in morally lax behavior, such as cheating. Although these results do not imply that scientists should avoid studying the limits of free will, they do suggest a note of caution in broadcasting strong conclusions about the non-existence of free will until fully warranted by the evidence.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.