Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Lines of ThoughtCentral Concepts in Cognitive Psychology$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lance Rips

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780195183054

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183054.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 April 2019

Reasons

Reasons

Chapter:
(p.289) 6 Reasons
Source:
Lines of Thought
Author(s):

Lance J. Rips (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183054.003.0007

This chapter attempts to make the case for the possibility that a distinct cognitive process is responsible for our ability to recognize entailments as logically necessary relations. It shows that current unitary theories of reasoning—those in which all forms of reasoning are due to a single psychological process—don't have the resources to explain what's special about our recognition of entailments. In doing so, it reviews some of the main theories of deduction that have been in play during the last few years. It also draws on some recent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for dissociations between deductive and inductive reasoning. If the type of reasoning responsible for entailments is unique, however, then this places a special burden on theories of deduction. What sort of faculty could apprehend these necessary relations? The chapter considers some alternative ways of dividing reasoning abilities, including those based on content, and argues that these accounts fail to provide a plausible theory of deduction.

Keywords:   deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, natural kinds, unitary theories, cognitive process, deduction

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .