Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Truth of EcologyNature, Culture, Literature in America$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Dana Phillips

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780195137699

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2007

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137699.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 April 2019

The Science Wars, Ecology, and the Left

The Science Wars, Ecology, and the Left

Chapter:
(p.83) 3 The Science Wars, Ecology, and the Left
Source:
The Truth of Ecology
Author(s):

Dana Phillips (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137699.003.0003

In the academy, the so-called Science Wars of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s were waged largely by those on the left who were interested in the theories and findings of the several disciplines in which historical, philosophical, political, and sociological science studies are pursued. These radical critics equated scientific knowledge with power, but made an exception for ecology, which they saw as utopian because they too readily accepted the popular view of ecology as holistic and communitarian, and therefore as radically unlike physics, which has long set the standard for reductive and mechanistic views of nature as well as for objectivity and certainty. Radical critics of science have no faith in the latter, believing instead in the social construction of scientific knowledge, and asserting that the goal of most scientific research and experimentation is the domination of nature. Their confidence in theories of social construction leads them to treat science as just one form of discourse among others, and to dismiss disciplines like sociobiology and genetics as politically suspect. But many of these critics of science — who are variously influenced by Critical Theory, cultural studies, ecofeminism, and so-called social ecology — seem blithely to accept sociological determinism (which would appear to be just as onerous as any other form of determinism) and seem to misunderstand scientific realism, which is a realism not about theories or “discourses” but about entities which cannot be understood as mere effects of meaning or artifacts of signification.

Keywords:   Critical Theory, discourse, domination, ecofeminism, ecology, physics, social ecology, sociobiology, science studies, Science Wars

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .