Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
On Our MindSalience, Context, and Figurative Language$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Rachel Giora

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780195136166

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 March 2019

Evidence from Other Research

Evidence from Other Research

Chapter:
(p.185) 8 Evidence from Other Research
Source:
On Our Mind
Author(s):

Rachel Giora

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.003.0008

This chapter reviews the findings of other research concerning comprehension of literal and nonliteral language. The result suggests that language comprehension is best explained by the Graded Salience Hypothesis and that the apparently conflicting findings is consistent with the view that salient meanings are always accessed automatically regardless of either literality or contextual information. It also reveals that figurative and literal utterances involve similar processes when they converge in salience.

Keywords:   Graded Salience Hypothesis, literality, contextual information, salient meanings

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .