Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
On Our MindSalience, Context, and Figurative Language$

Rachel Giora

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780195136166

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 26 February 2017

(p.213) References

(p.213) References

Source:
On Our Mind
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Abdullaev, Y. G., & Posner, M. I. (1997). Time course of activating brain areas in generating verbal associations. Psychological Science, 8, 56–59.

Abrams, K., & Bever, T. G. (1969). Syntactic structures modifies attention during speech perception and recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 280–290.

Abrahams, J., Zucker, D., & Zucker, J. (1980). Flying high. USA: Paramount.

Ackerman, B. P. (1981). Young children's understanding of a speaker's intentional use of a false utterance. Developmental Psychology, 17, 472–480.

Ackerman, B. P. (1983). Form and function in children's understanding of ironic utterances. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 487–508.

Altmann, G. T. M. (1988). Ambiguity, parsing strategies, and computational models. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 73–97.

Altmann, G. T. M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interacting with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238.

Altmann, G. T. M., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 685–712.

Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Kravetz, S. (1998). Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 36, 691–700.

Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 65–87.

Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing NP antecedents. London: Routledge.

Ariel, M. (1991). The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 443–463.

Ariel, M. (1998). Discourse markers and form-function correlations. In A. H. Jucker & Y. Ziv (Eds.), Discourse markers (pp. 217–253). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ariel, M. (1999a, June). Against a unique literal meanings. Paper presented at Pragma99: International Conference on Pragmatics and Negotiations, Tel Aviv University.

(p.214) Ariel, M. (1999b). Mapping so-called “pragmatic” phenomena according to a “linguistic-extralinguistic” distinction: The case of propositions marked “accessible.” In M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan, & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Vol. 2: Case studies (pp. 11–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ariel, M. (2000). The development of person agreement markers: From pronouns to higher accessibility markers. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage based models of language (pp. 197–260). Stanford: CSLI

Ariel, M. (2002a). The demise of a unique literal meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 361–402. Special issue on “Literal, minimal, salient, and privileged meanings,” ed. M. Ariel.

Ariel, M. (2002b). Privileged interactional interpretations. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1003–1044.

Ariel, M. (In press). Pragmatics and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Ariel, M., & Giora, R. (1992a). Gender versus group-relation analysis of impositive speech acts. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, April 4 and 5,1992 (Vol. 1, pp. 11–22). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society

Ariel, M., & Giora, R. (1992b). The role of women in linguistic and narrative change: A study of the Hebrew pre-state literature. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 2, 309–332.

Ariel, M., & Giora, R. (1998). A Self versus Other point of view in language: Redefining femininity and masculinity. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 129, 59–86.

Ariel, M., & Giora, R. (2000). Pragmatics. In A. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 272–275). New York and Washington, DC: Oxford University Press and American Psychological Association.

Armstrong, S., Gleitman, L., & Gleitman, H. (1983). What some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13, 263–308.

Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S. (1996a). Humor. In J. Verschueren, J-O. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Attardo, S. (1996b). Humor theory beyond jokes: The treatment of humorous texts at large. In J. Hulstijn & A. Nijholt (Eds.), Automatic interpretation and generation of verbal humor. IWCH ‘96. Twente Workshop on Language and Technology 12 (pp. 87–101). Enschede: University of Twente.

Attardo, S. (1998). Theoretical pragmatics. Unpublished manuscript.

Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 793–826.

Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantics and pragmatics analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S., Attardo, D. H., Bakes, P., & Petray, M. J. (1994). The linear organization of jokes: Analysis of two thousand texts. Humor, 7, 27–54.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Balaban, N. (2002). Negation: Lexical access and integration. Unpublished M. A. thesis, Tel Aviv University.

Ball, C. N., & Ariel, M. (1978). Or something, etc. Penn Review of Linguistics, 3, 35–45.

(p.215) Balogh, J., Zurif, E., Prather, P., Swinney, D., & Finkel, L. (1998). End-of-sentence effects in real-time language processing: Anew perspective on Blumstein et al.'s findings. Brain and Language, 61, 169–182.

Balota, D. A. (1994). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 303–358). San Diego: Academic Press.

Balota, D. A., & Duchek, J. M. (1991). Semantic priming effects, lexical repetition effects and contextual disambiguation effects in healthy aged individuals and individuals with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain and Language, 40, 181–201.

Barsalou, L. W., & Prinz, J. J. (1997). Mundane creativity in perceptual symbol systems. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery, and change (pp. 267–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

Bassili, J. N. (1989). Trait encoding in behavior identification and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 285–296.

Bassili, J. N. & Smith, M. C. (1986). On the spontaneity of trait attribution: Converging evidence for the role of cognitive strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 239–245.

Bassili, John N., Smith, M. C, & MacLeod, C. M. (1989). Auditory and visual word stem completion: Separating data-driven and conceptually-driven processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41 A, 439–453.

Bates, E. (1999). On the nature and nurture of language. In E. Bizzi, P. Calissano, & V. Volterra (Eds.), Frontiere della biologia Il cervello di Homo sapiens [Frontiers of biology: The brain of homo sapiens] (pp. 241–265). Rome: Istituto della Enciclope-dia Italiana fondata da Giovanni Trecanni S.p.A.

Bates, E., Hernandez, A., & Pizzamilglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 992–1004.

Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of language processing (pp. 3–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Beauvillain, C., & Grainger, J. (1987). Accessing interlexical homographs: Some limitations of a language-selective access. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 658–672.

Beeman, M., Friedman, R., Grafman, J., Perez, E., Diamond, S., & Lindsey, M. (1994). Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 26–45.

Berg, J. (1993). Literal meaning and context. Iyyun, 42, 391–411. (In Hebrew).

Bergson, H. (1956). Laughter. In W. Sypher (Ed.), Comedy (pp. 61–190).New York: Anchor Books.

Bergvall, V. L., Bing, J. M., & Freed, F. A (1996). Rethinking language and gender: Theory and practice. London: Longman.

Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structure. In J. R. Hays (Ed.), Cognitive and the development of language. New York: Wiley.

Bihrle, A. M., Brownell, H. H., Powelson, J., & Gardner, H. (1986). Comprehension of humorous and non-humorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Cognition, 5, 399–411.

Binder, K. S., & Morris, R. K. (1995). Eye movement and lexical ambiguity resolution: Effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1186–1196.

(p.216) Binder, K. S., & Rayner, K. (1998). Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations and self-paced reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 217–276.

Binder, K. S., & Rayner, K. (1999). Does contextual strength modulate the subordinate bias effect? A reply to Kellas and Vu. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 518–522.

Blank, G. D. (1988). Metaphors in the lexicon. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3, 21–36.

Blasko, G. D., & Connine, C. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 295–308.

Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 657–668.

Block, F. L. (1989). Weetzie bat. New York: Harper Trophy.

Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1990). Evidence from the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 413–432.

Booth, W. (1974). A rhetoric of irony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 545–552.

Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E., Schenone, P., Scarpa, P., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117, 1241–1253.

Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (1995, November). The career of metaphor. Poster presented at the Thirty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, California.

Bowdle, F. B., & Gentner, D. (1999). Metaphor comprehension: From comparison to categorization. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 90–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2001). The career of metaphor: Patterns of change in figurative language and figurative thought. Unpublished ms.

Bradley, D. C, & Forster, K. I. (1987). A reader's view of listening. Cognition, 25, 103–134.

Bredin, H. (1997). The semantic structure of verbal irony. Journal of Literary Semantics, 26, 1–19.

Brinker, M. (1988). Aesthetics as the theory of criticism. Tel Aviv: Broadcast University and the Ministry of Defense, Israel.

Brisard, F., Frisson, S., & Sandra, D. (2001). Processing unfamiliar metaphors in a self-paced reading task. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 87–108.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brownell, H. H. (1988). Appreciation of metaphoric and connotative word meaning by brain damaged patients. In C. Chiarello (Ed.), Right hemisphere contributions to lexical semantics (pp. 19–31). New York: Springer.

Brownell, H. H., Michel, D., Powelson, J., & Gardner, H. (1983). Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right hemisphere patients. Brain and Language, 18, 20–27.

(p.217) Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Michelow, D., & Gardner, H. (1984). Sensitivity to lexical denotation and connotation in brain-damaged patients: A double dissociation. Brain and Language, 22, 253–265.

Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Bihrle, A. M., & Gardner, H. (1986). Inference deficits in right brain damaged patients. Brain and Language, 27, 310–321

Brugman, C. (1997). Polysemy. In J. Verschueren, J-O. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Brugman, C. & Lakoff, G. (1988). Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In S. Small, G. Cottrell, & M. Tannenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution (pp. 477–508). Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1997). Modeling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 177–210.

Burgess, C., & Simpson, G. B. (1988a). Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings. Brain and Language, 33, 86–103.

Burgess, C., & Simpson, G. B. (1988b). Neuropsychology of lexical ambiguity resolution: The contribution of divided visual field studies. In S. L. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence (pp. 411–130). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Burgess, C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1989). Context and lexical access: Implication of nonword interference for lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 620–632.

Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cairns, H. S. (1984). Current issues in language comprehension. In R. Naremore (Ed.), Recent advances in language science (pp. 221–237). San Diego: College Hill Press.

Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.

Carpenter, P. A., & Daneman, M. (1981). Lexical retrieval and error recovery in reading: A model based on eye fixations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 737–744.

Carreiras, M. (1992). Estrategias de análisis sintáctico en el procesamiento de frases: Cierre temprano versus cierre tradío. Cognitiva, 4, 3–27.

Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (1996). The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 639–663.

Carroll G., & Rooth, M. (1998, June). Valence induction with a head–lexicalized PCFG. Paper presented at the Third Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Granada, Spain.

Carroll, J., Davis, P., & Richman, B. (1976). Word frequency book. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Carroll, N. (1994). Visual metaphor. In J. Hintikka (Ed.), Aspects of metaphor (pp. 189–218). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Carroll, N. (1996). A note on film metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 809–822. Special issue “On the Cognitive and Cinematic Visual Discourse,” ed. R. Giora.

Carston, R. (1988). Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In R. Kempson (Ed.), Mental representations: The interface between language and reality (pp. 155–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carston, R. (1993). Conjunction, explanation, and relevance. Lingua, 90, 27–48.

Castel-Bloom, O. (1992). Dolly city. Tel Aviv: Zmora Bitan. (In Hebrew).

(p.218) Challis B. H., & Brodbeck, D. R. (1992). Levels of processing affects priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 595–607.

Chiappe, D. L., & Kennedy, J. M. (1999). Aptness predicts preference for metaphors or similes, as well as recall bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 668–676.

Chiappe, D. L., & Kennedy, J. M. (2001). Literal bases for metaphor and simile. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 249–276. Special issue “On Models of Figurative Language,” ed. R. Giora.

Chiappe, D. L., Kennedy, J. M., & Chiappe, R. (1999). Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in predicting recognition bias and preference for metaphors and similes. Unpublished ms.

Chiarello, C. (1991). Interpretation of word meanings by the cerebral hemispheres: One is not enough. In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 251–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Chiarello, C. (1998). On codes of meaning and the meaning of codes: Semantic access of retrieval within and between hemispheres. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Chwilla, D. J., Hagoort, R, & Brown, C. M. (1998). The mechanism underlying backward priming in a lexical decision task: Spreading activation versus semantic matching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 51A, 531–560.

Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430–477.

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, H. H. & Carlson, T. B. (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58, 332–373.

Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. (1983). Understanding old words with new meanings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 591–608.

Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126.

Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W. (1997). Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science, 21, 247–282.

Clifton, C. Jr., & Ferreira, F. (1989). Ambiguity in context. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 77–103.

Coates, J. (1986). Women, men and language. London: Longman.

Coates, J. (1996). Women talk. Oxford: Blackwell.

Colston, H. L. (1997). Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes, 23, 25–45.

Colston, H. L., Giora, R., & Katz, A. (2000, July). Joke comprehension: Salience and context effects. Paper presented at the Seventh International Pragmatics Conference, Budapest.

Colston, H. L., & O'Brien, J. (2000). Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1557–1583.

Connine, M. C., Blasko, D., Brandt, R., & Kaplan Layer, J. (1992). Idiomatic processing: Syntactic frozenness and subjective familiarity. Psychological Research, 54, 225–232.

Connine, C. M., Blasko, D., & Wang, J. (1994). Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Multiple lexical activation, individual differences, and the role of sentence context. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 624–636.

(p.219) Conrad, C. (1974). Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon. Memory & Cognition, 2, 130–138.

Coppola, F. F. (1972). The godfather. Paramount Pictures.

Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coulson, S. & Kutas, M. (1998). Frame-shifting and sentential integration. University of California, San Diego: Cognitive Science Technical Report 98.03.

Coulson, S. & Kutas, M. (2001). Getting it: Human event-related response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters, 316, 71–74.

Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (1999). Conceptual integration and metaphor: An ERP study. Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting Program 1999: A Supplement of the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 50.

Coulson, S. & Van Petten, C. (in press). Conceptual integration and metaphor comprehension: An ERP Study. Memory & Cognition.

Crawford, M. (1995). Talking difference: On gender and language. London: Sage.

Creusere, M. A. (1999). Theories of adults' understanding and use of irony and sarcasm: Applications to and evidence from research with children. Developmental Review, 19, 213–261.

Creusere, M. A. (2000). A developmental test of theoretical perspectives on the understanding of verbal irony: Children's recognition of allusion and pragmatic insincerity. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 29–45.

Cronk, B. C, Lima, S. D., & Schweigert, W. A. (1993). Idioms in sentences: Effects of frequency, literalness, and familiarity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 59–82.

Cronk, B. C., & Schweigert, W. A. (1992). The comprehension of idioms: Effects of familiarity, literalness, and usage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 131–146.

Curcó, C. (1995). Some observations on the pragmatics of humorous interpretations: A relevance theoretic approach. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 27–47.

Curcó, C. (1996a). The implicit expression of attitudes, mutual manifestness, and verbal humor. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 89–99.

Curcó, C. (1996b). Relevance theory and humorous interpretations. In N. Hulstijn & A. Nijholt (Eds.), Automatic interpretation and generation of verbal humor (pp. 53–68). Twente: University of Twente.

Curcó, C. (1997). The pragmatics of humorous interpretations: A relevance-theoretic approach. Unpublished ms.

Curcó, C. (1998). Indirect echoes and verbal humor. In V. Rouchota & A. H. Jucker (Eds.), Current issues in relevance theory (pp. 305–325). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Curcó, C. (2000). Irony: negation, echo and metarepresentation. Lingua, 110, 257–280.

Cutler, A. (1974). On saying what you mean without meaning what you say. In M. W. Lagaly, R. A. Fox, & A. Bruck (Eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting (pp. 117–127). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Daly, M. (1978). Gyn/ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.

Dascal, M. (1987). Defining literal meaning. Cognitive Science, 11, 259–281.

Dascal, M. (1989). On the role of context and literal meaning in understanding. Cognitive Science, 13, 253–257.

De Palma, P., & Weiner E. J. (1990, July). “When a riddle is not a riddle?” Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference, Barcelona.

Dews, S., Kaplan, J. & Winner, E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes, 19, 347–368.

(p.220) Dews, S. & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 3–19.

Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1997). Attributing meaning to deliberately false utterances: The case of irony. In C. Mandell & A. McCabe (Eds.), The problem of meaning: Behavioral and cognitive perspectives (pp. 377–414). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1999). Obligatory processing of the literal and nonliteral meanings of ironic utterances. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1579–1599.

Dopkins, S., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Lexical ambiguity and eye fixation in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 461–477.

Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25, 219–253.

Du Bois, W. J. (1998, January). Dialogic syntax. Paper presented at the Cognitive Theories of Intertextuality Meeting, Tel Aviv University.

Du Bois, W. J. (2000a, May). Reusable syntax: Socially distributed cognition in dialogic interaction. Paper presented at CSDL 2000: Fifth Conference on Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Du Bois, W. J. (2000b). Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English. CD-ROM. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.[www.Ldc.upnn.edu/publication.sbc/]

Du Bois, W. J., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ducas, G. (1998).Irony aptness: The case of visual and cinematic discourse. M.A. thesis, Tel Aviv University.

Dudai, Y. (1989). The neurobiology of memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dudai, Y. (1996). Consolidation: Fragility on the road to the engram. Neuron, 17, 367–370.

Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixations times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429–446.

Elnatan, I. (2002). Degree of innovation and pleasure rating. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Tel Aviv University (in Hebrew).

Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2001). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20, 29–62.

Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central processes of grammar. In A.Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 113–130). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133–187.

Faust, M. (1998). Obtaining evidence of language comprehension from sentence priming. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 161–185). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Faust, M., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Sentence context and lexical resolution by the two hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 36, 827–836.

Faust, M., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). Cerebral mechanisms for suppression of inappropriate information during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 53, 234–259.

(p.221) Faust, M., & Kahane, A. (2002). Summation of activation in the cerebral hemisphere: Evidence from semantically convergent and semantically divergent primes. Neuropsychologia 40, 892–901.

Ferreira, E, & Clifton, C. Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725–745.

Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. D. (1990). Thematic roles and modularity: Comments on the chapters by Frazier and Tanenhaus et al. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 434–456). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Forceville, C. F. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465–495.

Forster, K. I. (1989). Basic issues in lexical processing. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 75–107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Forster, K. I., & Bednall, E. S. (1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 4, 53–61.

Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Frazier, L. (1987a). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 559–586). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Frazier, L. (1987b). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 519–560.

Frazier, L. (1990). Exploring the architecture of the language-processing system. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 409–433). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Frazier, L., Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1999). Taking on semantic commitments, II: Collective versus distributive readings. Cognition, 70, 87–104.

Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1987). Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexical ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 505–526.

Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1990). Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 181–200.

French, M. (1977). The women's room. New York: Summit Books.

Freud, S. (1905/1960). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York: Norton.

Frisson, S., & Pickering M. (2001). Obtaining a figurative interpretation of a word: Support for underspecification. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 149–172. Special issue “On Models of Figurative Language,” ed. R. Giora.

Galbraith, G. G., & Taschman, C. S. (1969). Homophone units: A normative methodological investigation of the strength of component elements. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 731–144.

Gardner, H. & Brownell, H. H. (1986). The right hemispheric communication battery. Boston: Psychology Service.

Garrod, S., & Terras, M. (2000). The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to (p.222) resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 526–544.

Gentner, D., & Bowdle, F. B. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 223–247. Special issue “On Models of Figurative Language,” ed. R. Giora.

Gentner, D., & Wolff, R. (1997). Alignment in the processing of metaphor. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 331–355.

Gentner, D., & Wolff, P. (2000). Metaphor and knowledge change. In E. Dietrich & A. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines (pp. 295–342). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving twenty years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256–281.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32(2), 99–156.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science, 4, 294–298.

Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1990). The role of suppression in sentence comprehension. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 97–128). Amsterdam: North Holland.

Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 17, 245–262.

Gernsbacher, M. A., Keysar, B., Robertson, R. W., & Werner, Ν. K. (2001). The role of suppression and enhancement in understanding metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 433–450.

Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. W. (1995). Reading skill and suppression revisited. Psychological Science, 6,165–169.

Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. W. (1999). Parallel form affects sentence comprehension. Unpublished ms.

Gerrig, R. J. (1989). The time course of sense creation. Memory & Cognition, 17,194–207.

Gerrig, R. J., & Healy, A. F. (1983). Dual process in metaphor understanding: Comprehension and appreciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 667–675.

Gibbs, R.W. Jr. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition, 8,449–456.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1982). A critical examination of the contribution of literal meaning to understanding nonliteral discourse. Text, 2,9–21.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1983). Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9,524–533.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1984). Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 575–304.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1986a). Comprehension and memory for nonliteral utterances: The problem of sarcastic indirect requests. Acta Psychologica, 62, 41–57.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1986b). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 3–15.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1986c). Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation. Discourse Processes, 9, 17–30.

(p.223) Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1986d). What makes some indirect speech acts conventional? Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 181–196.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1990). Comprehending figurative referential descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 56–66.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1991). Metaphor as constraint on individual creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 86–88.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1993). Processes and products in making sense of tropes. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 252–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1998a). Counterpoint commentary. In A. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, & M. Turner (Eds.), Figurative language and thought (pp. 158–192). New York: Oxford University Press.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1998b). The fight over metaphor in thought and language. In A. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, & M. Turner (Eds.), Figurative language and thought (pp. 88–118). New York: Oxford University Press.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 317–333.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 457–486. Special issue on “Literal, minimal, salient, and privileged meanings,” ed. M. Ariel.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr., Buchalter, D. L., Moise, J. F., & Farrar W. T. (1993). Literal meaning and figurative language. Discourse Processes, 16, 387–403.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Gerrig, R. J. (1989). How context makes metaphor comprehension seem “special.” MetaphorandSymbolic Activity, 4,145–158.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Gonzales, G. (1985). Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms. Cognition, 20, 243–259.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Moise, J. F. (1997). Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition, 62, 51–74.

Gibbs, R. W. Jr., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576–593.

Gibbs, R.W. Jr., O'Brien, J., & Doolittle S. (1995). Inferring meanings that are not intended: Speakers' intentions and irony comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 187–203.

Gildea, P., & Glucksberg, S. (1983). On understanding metaphor: The role of context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 577–590.

Giles, H. (Ed.) (1984). The dynamics of speech accommodation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46.

Giora, R. (1985a). A text-based analysis of nonnarrative texts. Theoretical Linguistics, 12, 115–135.

Giora, R. (1985b). Towards a theory of coherence. Poetics Today, 6, 699–716.

Giora, R. (1988). On the informativeness requirement. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 547–565.

Giora, R. (1991). On the cognitive aspects of the joke. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 465–486. Special issue on “Cognitive Perspectives of Language Use,” ed. R. Giora and A. Kasher.

Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19, 239–264.

Giora, R. (1997a). Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 17–34.

(p.224) Giora, R. (1997b). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7,183–206.

Giora, R. (1998a). Discourse coherence is an independent notion: A reply to Deirdre Wilson. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 75–86.

Giora, R. (1998b). Irony. In J. Verschueren, J-O. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Giora, R. (1998c). When is relevance? On the role of salience in utterance interpretation. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 11, 85–94.

Giora, R. (1999a). Indirect negation view of irony: Dolly City—a compassionate city. In Z. Ben Porat (Ed.), An overcoat of Benjamin: Papers on literature for Benjamin Harshav, on his seventieth birthday (pp. 187–192). Porter Institute, Tel Aviv University—Hakibbutz Hameuchad. (In Hebrew).

Giora, R. (1999b). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31,919–929.

Giora, R. (2001). Irony and its discontent. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), Psychology of language: In honour of Elrud Ibsch (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Giora, R. (2002a). Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 487–506. Special issue on “Literal, minimal, salient, and privileged meanings,” ed. M. Ariel.

Giora, R. (2002b). Masking one's themes: Irony and the politics of indirectness. In M. M. Louwerse & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics in psychology and literary studies (pp. 283–300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Giora, R. (2002c). Optimal innovation and pleasure. In O. Stock, C. Strapparava & A. Nijholt (Eds.), Proceedings of The April Fools 'Day Workshop on Computational Humour, April 2002, ITC-itst, Trento (pp. 11–28). Trento: ITC-itst.

Giora, R. (2002d). Theorizing gender: Feminist awareness and language change. In B. Baron & H. Kotthoff (Eds.), Gender in interaction (pp. 329–347). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Giora, R., & Balaban, N. (2001). Lexical access in text production: On the role of salience in metaphor resonance. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren's (Eds.), Text representation (pp. 1–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Giora, R., Balaban, N., & Fein, O. (2002, June). Explicit negation as positivity in disguise. Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual Meeting of The Society for Text and Discourse. Chicago.

Giora, R., Balaban, N., Fein, O., & Alkabets, I. (in press). Negation as positivity in disguise. In H. L. Colston, & A. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999a). Irony: Context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 241–257.

Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999b). Irony comprehension: The graded salience hypothesis. Humor, 12,425–436.

Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999c). On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language.Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1601–1618. Special issue on “Figurative and Literal Language,” ed. R. Giora.

Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., & Zur, A. (2002, April). Optimal innovationand affect. April Fools' Day Workshop. Trento, Italy.

Giora, R., Fein O., & Schwartz, T. (1997). On the time course of understanding Metaphor and Symbol,Unpublished ms.

Giora, R., Fein O., & Schwartz, T. (1998). Irony: Graded salience and indirect negation. Metaphor and Symbol, 13, 83–101.

(p.225) Giora R., & Gur, I. (in press). Irony in conversation: Salience and context effects. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Giora, R., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., & Fein, O. (2001, July). The role of salience in aesthetic creativity. Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Giora, R., Peleg, O., & Fein, O. (2001, May). Resisting contextual information: You can't put a salient meaning down. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Towards an Experimental Pragmatics, University of Lyon.

Giora, R., Zaidel, E., Soroker, N., Batori, G., & Kasher, A. (2000). Differential effects of right and left hemispheric damage on understanding sarcasm and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 63–83.

Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.

Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theory of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379–401.

Glucksberg, S. (1989). Metaphors in conversation: How are they understood? Why are they used? Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4, 125–143.

Glucksberg, S. (1991). Beyond literal meanings: The psychology of allusion. Psychological Science, 2, 146–152.

Glucksberg, S. (1995). Commentary on nonliteral language: Processing and use. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 47–57.

Glucksberg, S. (1998). Understanding metaphors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 39—43.

Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. New York: Oxford University Press.

Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 85–98.

Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18.

Glucksberg, S., Kreuz, R., & Rho, S. H. (1986). Context can constrain lexical access: Implications for models of language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 323–335.

Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. S., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50–67.

Glucksberg, S., Newsome, M. R., & Goldvarg, Y. (2001). Inhibition of the literal: Filtering metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 277–294.

Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999a). Creative sparks. Science, 258, 1495–1496.

Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999b). The fundamental templates of quality ads. Marketing Science, 18, 333–351.

Gorfein, D. S. (Ed.) (1989). Resolving semantic ambiguity. New York: Springer Verlag.

Gow, D. W., & Gordon, P. C. (1995). Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 344–359.

Gregory, M. E., & Mergler, N. L. (1990). Metaphor comprehension: In search of literal truth, possible sense, and metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 5, 151–173.

(p.226) Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

Grice, H. P. (1978). Some further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Pragmatics: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 9, pp. 113–127). New York: Academic Press.

Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 267–283.

Hagoort, P. (1989). Processing lexical ambiguities: A comment on Milberg, Blumstein, and Dworetzky (1987). Brain and Language, 36, 335–348.

Haiman, J. (1998). Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of language. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hamblin, J. & Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2001, May). Processing the meanings of what speakers say and implicate. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Towards an Experimental Pragmatics, University of Lyon.

Hareven, S. (1982). Bdidut. [Loneliness]. Tel-Aviv: Am-Oved. (In Hebrew).

Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica, 42, 335–346.

Harnad, S. (1993). Grounding symbols in the analog world with neural nets. Think, 2, 12–78.

Harrison, A. A. (1977). Mere exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 610–646). New York: Academic Press.

Hasson, U. (2000). Comprehension of negation in negated metaphors. M.A. thesis,Princeton University, New Jersey.

Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521.

Heinlein, R. A. (1963). Stranger in a strange land. New York: Putnam.

Hernandez, A. E., Fennema-Notestine, C., Udell, C., & Bates, E. (2001). Lexical and sentential priming in competition: Implications for two-stage theories of lexical access. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 191–215.

Heyd, M. (1986). Aubrey Beardsley: Symbol, mask and self-irony. New York: Peter Lang.

Hillert, D., & Swinney, D. (2001). The processing of fixed expressions during sentence comprehension. In A. Cienki, B. Luka, & M. Smith (Eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure (pp. 107–122). Stanford, CA: CSLI.

Hindle, D., & Rooth, M. (1993). Structural ambiguity and lexical relations. Computational Linguistics, 19, 103–120.

Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgements: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1–18.

Hirshman, E., Snodgrass, J. G., Mindes, J., & Feenan, K. (1990). Conceptual priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 634–647.

Hogaboam, T. W., & Perfetti, C. A. (1975). Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 265–274.

Holtgraves, T. (1998). Interpersonal foundations of conversation indirectness. In S. Fussell & R. Kreuz (Eds.), Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication (pp. 71–90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Honeck, R. P., Welge, J., & Temple, J. G. (1998). The symmetry control in tests of the standard pragmatic model: The case of proverb comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 13, 257–273.

(p.227) Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Horn, L. R., & Bayer, S. (1984). Short-circuited implicature: A negative contribution. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7, 397–414.

Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59, 91–117.

Howes, D., & Soloman, R. L. (1951). Visual duration thresholds as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401–410.

Hubbell, J. A., & O'Boyle, M. W. (1995). The effects of metaphorical and literal comprehension processes on lexical decision latency of sentence components. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 269–287.

Hudson, J. (1998). Perspectives on fixedness: Applied and theoretical. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.

Hutcheon, L. (1991). Splitting images: Contemporary Canadian ironies. Toronto: Oxford University Press.

Inhoff, A. W., Lima, S. D., & Carroll, P. J. (1984). Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading. Memory & Cognition, 12, 558–567.

Ivanko, S., & Pexman, P. M. (2001, July). Understanding irony: On-line processing of figurative and literal meaning. Poster presented at the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Janus, R. J., & Bever, T. G. (1985). Processing of metaphoric language: An investigation of the three stage model of metaphor comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, 473–487.

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johnson, M. G., & Malgady, R. G. (1979). Some cognitive aspects of figurative language: Association and metaphor. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 249–265.

Jones, J. L. (1991). Early integration of context during lexical access of homonym meanings. Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 10, 163–181.

Jorgensen, J., Miller, G., & Sperber, D. (1984). Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 112–120.

Juliano, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1993). Contingent frequency effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution. In Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 593–598). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Juliano, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). A constraint based lexicalist account of the subject-object attachment preference. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 459–471.

Jurafsky, D. (1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 20, 137–194.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixation to comprehension. Psychological Review, 4, 329–354.

Just, M. J., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.

Just, M. J., Carpenter, P. J., & Wooley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.

Kaplan, J. & Zaidel, E. (2001). Error monitoring in the hemispheres: The effect of feedback on lateralized lexical decision. Cognition, 82, 157–178

(p.228) Kasher, A. (1991). On the pragmatic modules: A lecture. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 381–397.

Kasher, A. (1998). Pragmatics and the modularity of mind. In A. Kasher (Ed.), Pragmatics: Critical concepts (Vol. 6, pp. 230–252). London: Routledge.

Kasher, A., Batori, G., Soroker, N., Graves, D., & Zaidel, E. (1999). Effects of right-and left-hemisphere damage on understanding conversational implicatures. Brain and Language, 68, 566–590.

Katz, A. N. (1986). On choosing the vehicles for metaphors: Referential concreteness, semantic distances, and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Languge, 28, 486–499.

Katz, A. N. (1998). Figurative language and figurative thought. In A. N. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. W. Gibbs Jr., & M. Turner (Eds.), Figurative language and thought (pp. 3–43). New York: Oxford University Press.

Katz A. N., & T. Ferretti (2000, November). Reading proverbs in context: The role of explicit markers. Poster presented at the Forty-first Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Katz, A. N., & T. Ferretti (2001). Moment-by-moment reading of proverbs in literal and nonliteral contexts. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 193–221.

Katz, A. N., Ferretti, T., & Taylor, T. (1999, November). “Moment-by-moment comprehension of proverbs.” Paper presented at the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.

Katz, A. N. & Pexman, P. (1997). Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker occupation can change metaphor into irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 12, 19–41.

Katz, J. J. (1977). Propositional structure and illocutionary force. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

Kawamoto, A. H. (1988). Distributed representations of ambiguous words and their resolution in a connectionist network. In S. I. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence (pp. 195–228). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Kawamoto, A. H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474–516.

Kecskés, I. (1999). The use of situation-bound utterances from an interlanguage perspective. In J. Verscheuren (Ed.), Pragmatics in 1998: Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 299–310). Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.

Kecskés, I. (2000). A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 605–625.

Kecskés, I. (2002a). The “graded salience hypothesis” in second language acquisition. In S. Niemeier & M. Puetz (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics (pp. 249–271). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kecskés, I. (2002b). Situation-bound utterances in LI and L2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kecskés, I., & Papp, T. (2000). Foreign language and mother tongue. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Keenan, J. (1978). Inferring causal connections in prose comprehension. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention.

Kemper, S. (1981). Comprehension and interpretation of proverbs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 179–183.

Kennedy, V. R., & Kennedy, J. M. (1993). Metaphor and visual rhetoric. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8, 149–255.

(p.229) Keysar, B. (1989). On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 375–385.

Keysar, B. (1994a). Discourse context effects: Metaphorical and literal interpretations. Discourse Processes, 18, 247–269.

Keysar, B. (1994b). The illusory transparency of intention: Linguistic perspective taking in text. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 165–208.

Keysar, B. (1998). Language users as problem solvers: Just what ambiguity problem do they solve? In S. Fussell & R. Kreuz (Eds.), Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication (pp. 175–200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Keysar, B. (2000). The illusory transparency of intention: Does June understand what Mark means because he means it? Discourse Processes, 29, 161–172.

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin J. J., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Sciences, 11, 32–38.

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin J. J., & Paek, T S. (1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 1–20.

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Horton, W. S. (1998). The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 7, 46–50.

Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1995). Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: Can one keep a secret by spilling the beans? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 89–109.

Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1999). Swimming against the current: Do idioms reflect conceptual structure? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1559–1578.

Keysar, B., & Glucksberg, S. (1992). Metaphor and communication. Poetics Today, 13, 633–658.

Keysar, B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S., & Horton, S. W. (2000). Conventional language: How metaphorical is it? Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 576–593.

Kiger, J. I. & Glass, A. L. (1983). The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occurring after the target. Memory & Cognition, 11, 356–365.

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kintsch, W., & Mross, E. F. (1985). Context effects in word identification. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 336–349.

Koivisto, M. (1997). Time course of semantic activation in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 35, 497–504.

Koriat, A. (1981). Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association. Memory & Cognition, 9, 587–598.

Kotthoff, H. (1996). Impoliteness and conversational joking: On relational politics. Folia Linguistica, 30, 299–325.

Kotthoff, H. (1998). Irony, quotation, and other forms of staged intertextuality: Double or contrastive perspectivation in conversation, Interaction and Linguistic Structures, 5, 1–27.

Kotthoff, H. (in press). Responding to irony in different contexts: cognition and conversation. Journal of Pragmatics.

Krasin, M. (1992a). A prize to Anita Hill. Noga, 23, 8. (In Hebrew).

Krasin, M. (1992b). In spite of everything, we don't give up. Noga, 23, 9. (In Hebrew).

Kreuz R., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 347–386.

(p.230) Kronrod, A. (2001). On the role of salience in optimal innovation: Aesthetics as a function of the old/new ratio. M.A. thesis, Tel Aviv University.

Kronrod, J., Giora, R., & Fein, O. (2000, September). Creative writing: The optimal creative innovation in fixed expressions. Paper presented at the EARLI special interest group writing conference, Università degli Studi di Verona

Kucera, H. & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of the pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–21.

Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 1019–1024.

Lakoff, G. (1986). The meanings of literal. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1, 291–296.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Landauer, T. K. (1999). Latent semantic analysis: A theory of the psychology of language and mind. Discourse Processes, 27, 303–310.

Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.

Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284.

Lars, E. (1996). Some notes on irony in the visual arts and music: The examples of Magritte and Shostakovich. Word and Image, 12(2), 197–208.

Larson, G. (1984). The far side gallery. Kansas City: Andrews, McMeel & Parker.

Lea, B. R. & Mulligan, E. J. (2002). The effect of negation on deductive inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 303–317.

Lee, J. C. (1990). Some hypothesis concerning the evolution of polysemous words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 211–219.

Lehrer, A. E. (1990). Polysemy, conventionality, and the structure of the lexicon. Cognitive Linguistics, 1–2, 207–246.

Levenson, R. W. (2003). Autonomic specificity and emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), The handbook of affective sciences (pp. 212–224). New York: Oxford University Press.

Levinson, C. S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, C. S. (1987a). Minimization and conversational inference. In: J. Verschueren & M. Bertuccelli-Papi (Eds.), The pragmatic perspective (pp. 61–130). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Levinson, C. S. (1987b). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics, 23, 379–434.

Levinson, C. S. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lewis, D. K. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Li, P., & M. C. Yip (1996). Lexical ambiguity and context effects in spoken word recognition: Evidence from Chinese. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the eighteenth (p.231) annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 228–232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Liu, H., Bates, E., Powell, T., & Wulfeck, B. (1997). Single-word shadowing and the study of lexical access. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 157–180.

Long, D. L. & Graesser, A. (1988). Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 11, 35–60.

Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of differential processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1456–1470.

Long, D. L., Seely, M. R., & Oppy, B. J. (1999). The strategic nature of less skilled readers' suppression problems. Discourse Processes, 27, 281–302.

Lucas, M. M. (1987). Context effects on the processing of ambiguous words in sentence context. Language and Speech, 30, 25–46.

Lund, K., Burgess, C., & Atchley, R. A. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in high dimensional semantic space. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 660–665). Pittsburgh, PA: Erlbaum.

MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157–201.

MacDonald, M. C. (1999). Distributional information in language comprehension, production, and acquisition: Three puzzles and a moral. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 177–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

MacDonald, M. C., & Just, M. A. (1989). Changes in activation levels with negation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 633–642.

MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. J., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 56–98.

MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703.

MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Malgady, R., & Johnson, M. (1976). Modifiers in metaphors: effects of constituent phrase similarity on the interpretation of figurative sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 43–52.

Mandler, G., Graf, P. & Kraft, D. (1986). Activation and elaboration effects in recognition and word priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 645–662.

Mandler, G., Hamson, C. O., Dorfman, J. (1990). Tests of dual process theory: Word priming and recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 713–739.

Marschark, M., Katz, A. N., & Paivio, A. (1983). Dimensions of metaphor. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 17–39.

Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1–71.

Martin, C., Vu, H., Kellas, G., & Metcalf, K. (1999). Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 813–839.

(p.232) Matlock, T. (1988). The metaphorical extensions of “see.” In J. Emonds, P. J. Mistry, V. Samiian, & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 185–195). Department of Linguistics, California State University, Fresno, CA.

Matlock, T. (1989). Metaphor and the grammaticalization of evidentials. In K. Hall, M. Meacham, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Theoretical Issues in Language Reconstruction (pp. 215–25). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Matzkel, Y. (1999, January-May). Nolad met (Born dead). Ramat Gan: Museum of Israeli Art.

McGlone, M. S., Glucksberg, S., & Cacciari, C. (1994). Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17, 167–190.

McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly(?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11, 424–428.

McNaughton, I. (1972). And now for something completely different. Columbia TriStar Home Video.

McRae, K., Ferretti, T. R., & Amyote, L. (1997). Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 137–176.

McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283–312.

Meehan, M. (1991). Men oh pause. In D. Taylor & A. Coverdale Sumrall (Eds.), Women in the 14th moon: Writings on menopause (p. 247). Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.

Merlo, P. (1994). A corpus based analysis of verb continuation frequencies for syntactic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 435–457.

Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing word pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407.

Milosky, L. M., & Ford, J. A. (1997). The role of prosody in children's inferences of ironic intent. Discourse Processes, 23, 47–61.

Mishori, E. (1999). The wall of motherhood. Trans. R. T. Back. In S. Kaufman, G. Hasan-Rokem, & T. S. Hess (Eds.), The defiant muse: Hebrew feminist poems from antiquity to the present (p. 237). New York: Feminist Press.

Mitchell, D. C. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 375–409). San Diego: Academic Press.

Miyake, J., Just, M. J., & Carpenter, A. P. (1994). Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 175–202.

Moon R. (1998). Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Morgan, J. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole (Ed.), Pragmatics, Syntax and Semantics 9 (pp. 261–280). New York: Academic Press.

Morris, R. K., & Binder, K. S. (2002). What do skilled readers do with the unselected meaning of an ambiguous word? In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on ambiguity resolution (pp. 139–153). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

(p.233) Mukařovský, J (1932/1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague School reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Mukařovský, J. (1978). Structure, sign and function. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Needham, W. P. (1992). Limits on literal processing during idiom interpretation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 1–16.

Neill, W. T., Hilliard, D. V., & Cooper, E. (1988). The detection of lexical ambiguity: Evidence for context-sensitive parallel access. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 279–287.

Nerlich, B., & Clarke D. D. (2001). Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1–20.

Ni, W., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Sidestepping the garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 283–334.

Nicolle, S., & Clark B. (1999). Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise. Cognition, 69, 337–354.

Nunberg, G., Sag, I., & Wasow, T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70, 491–538.

Oakhill, J. Garnham, J., & Reynolds, D. (1999, August). Evidence of immediate activation of gender information from a social role name. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Vancouver.

Oden, G., & Spria, J. (1983). Influence of context on the activation and selection of ambiguous word senses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 51–64.

Öhman, A. & Wiens, S. (2003). On the automaticity of autonomic responses in emotion: An evolutionary perspective. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), The handbook of affective sciences (pp. 256–275). New York: Oxford University Press.

Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory & Cognition, 9, 225–236.

Onishi, K. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1993). Metaphoric reference: When metaphors are not understood as easily as literal expressions. Memory & Cognition, 21, 763–772.

Ortony, J., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Antos, S. J. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 465–477.

Ortony, J., Vondruska, R. J., Foss, M. J., & Jones, L. E. (1985). Salience, similes, and asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 569–594.

Overson, C, & Mandler, M. (1987). Indirect word priming in connected and phonological contexts. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 229–232.

Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1993). The processing of homophonic homographs during reading: Evidence from eye movement studies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 251–271.

Pearlmutter, N. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (1992). Plausibility and syntactic ambiguity resolution. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 699–704). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pearlmutter, N. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (1995). Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 521–542.

Peleg, O. (1992). The relationship between linguistic divergence and social identity among Israelis of oriental origin. M.A. thesis, Tel Aviv University.

(p.234) Peleg, O. (2002). Linguistic and nonlinguistic mechanisms in language comprehension. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University.

Peleg, O., Giora, R., & Fein, O. (2001). Salience and context effects: Two are better than one. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 173–192.

Peleg, O., Giora, R., & Fein, O. (in press). Contextual strength: The whens and hows of context effects. In I. Noveck& D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Peterson, R. R., Burgess, C, Dell, G. S., & Eberhard, K. (1989). Dissociation of syntactic and semantic analyses during idiom processing. Paper presented at the Second Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York City.

Pexman P. M., Ferretti, T., & Katz, A. (2000). Discourse factors that influence irony detection during on-line reading. Discourse Processes, 29, 201–222.

Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2002). Does sarcasm always sting? Investigating the impact of ironic insults and ironic compliments. Discourse Processes, 33, 199–217.

Pickering, M., & Frisson, S. (2001a) “Familiarity, not literalness, affects language comprehension.” Unpublished ms.

Pickering, M., & Frisson, S. (2001b). Processing of verbs: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 556–573

Pickering, M., Traxler, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (2000). Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 447–475.

Picoult, J., & Johnson, M. K. (1992). Controlling for homophone polarity and prime target relatedness in the cross-modal lexical decision task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 15–18.

Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.

Pisani, V. (1967). L'Etimologia: Storia—questioni—metodo. Brescia: Paideia.

Piven, H. (1999). Piven, Avodot 1990–1999 [Piven, Works 1990–1999]. Tel Aviv: Am Oved.

Popiel, S. J., & McRae, K. (1988). The figurative and literal senses of idioms, or all idioms are not used equally. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 475–487.

Prather, P. J., & Swinney, D. J., (1988). Lexical processing and ambiguity resolution: An autonomous process in an interactive box. In S. I. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence (pp. 289–310). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Prinz, J. J., & Barsalou, L. W. (2002). Acquisition and productivity in perceptual symbol systems: An account of mundane creativity. In T. Dartnall (Ed.), Creativity, cognition and knowledge (pp. 105–107). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Pritchett, B. L. (1988). Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language, 64, 539–576.

Pritchett, B. L. (1991). Head position and parsing ambiguity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 251–270.

Pynte J., Besson, M., Robichon, F-H., & Poli J. (1996). The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 55, 293–316.

Rajaram, S., & Roediger, H. L. (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 765–776.

(p.235) Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Rattok, L. (1997). Angel of fire: The poetry of Yona Wallach. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad. (In Hebrew).

Rayner, K., Binder, K. S., & Duffy, S. (1999). Contextual strength and subordinate bias effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 841–852.

Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358–374.

Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1989). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 779–790.

Rayner, K., Garrod, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (1992). Discourse influences during parsing are delayed. Cognition, 45, 109–139.

Rayner, K., & Morris, R. K. (1991). Comprehension processes in reading ambiguous sentences: Reflections from eye movements. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 175–198). Amsterdam: North Holland.

Rayner, K., Pacht J. M., & Duffy, S. A. (1994). Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 527–544.

Rayner, K., & Sereno C. S. (1994). Eye movement in reading. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook ofpsycholinguistics (pp. 57–81). San Diego: Academic Press.

Rayner, K., Sereno, C. S., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Clifton, C. Jr. (1989). Eye movement and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 21–49.

Récanati, F. (1989). The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Behavior, 4, 295–329.

Récanati, F. (1993). Direct reference: From language to thought. Oxford: Blackwell.

Récanati, F. (1995). The alleged priority of literal meaning. Cognitive Science, 19, 207–232.

Reinhart, T. (1976). On understanding poetic metaphor. Poetics, 5, 383–402.

Reinhart, T. (1980). Conditions for text coherence. Poetics Today, 1, 161–180.

Reinhart, T. (2000). Self-inspection in the art of the 20th century. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad. (In Hebrew).

Renan, Y. (1984). Disautomatization and comic deviations from models of organizing experience. Style, 18, 160–176.

Richards, J., & French, C. C. (1991). Effects of encoding and anxiety on implicit and explicit memory performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 131–139.

Roediger, H. L., & Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion. Memory & Cognition, 15, 379–388.

Roediger, H. L., & Challis, B. H. (1992). Effects of exact repetition and conceptual repetition on free recall and primed word-fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 3–14.

Roos, D. (1998). The opposite of sex. Rysher Entertainment, Inc.

Rosch, E. H. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). New York: Academic Press.

Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.

(p.236) Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487–494.

Samih K. R, & Zacharia, C. E. (1997). Palestine and the Palestinians. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Sanford, A., & Garrod, S. (1981). Understanding written language. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.

Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt.

Schopenhauer, A. (1997 [1969]). The world as will and representation. In D. Cooper (Ed.), Aesthetics: The classical readings (pp. 150–163). Oxford, U. K.: Blackwell.

Schraw, G., Trather, W., Reynolds, R. E., & Lapan, R. T. (1988). Preferences for idioms: restrictions due to lexicalization and familiarity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 413–424.

Schvaneveldt, R. W., Meyer, D. E., & Becker, C. A. (1976). Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 243–256.

Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1991). The psychology of word meanings. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1985). The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 253–270.

Schweigert, W. A. (1986). The comprehension of familiar and less familiar idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 33–45.

Schweigert, W. A. (1991). The muddy waters of idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 305–314.

Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E., & Srinivas, K. (2000). Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 47–61.

Searle, J. R. (1978). Literal meaning. Erkenntnis, 13, 207–24.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meaning of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 489–537.

Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404.

Sela, I., & Mazali, R. (1993). Testimonies. A Film by Eduyot Association. Les Films D'Ici in Association with Channel 4, Commissioning Editor—Alan Fountain.

Sereno C. S., Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1992). The effect of meaning frequency on processing lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Psychological Science, 3, 269–300.

Sereno, C. S. (1995). Resolution of lexical ambiguity: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 582–595

Shen, Y. (1989). Symmetric and asymmetric comparisons. Poetics, 18, 517–536.

Shen, Y. (1991). Schemata, categories, and metaphor comprehension. Poetics Today, 12, 111–124.

Shen, Y. (1992). Metaphors and categories. Poetics Today, 13, 771–794.

Shen, Y. (1995). Cognitive constraints on directionality in the semantic structure of poetic vs. non-poetic metaphors. Poetics, 23, 255–274.

(p.237) Shen, Y., & Balaban, N. (1999). Metaphorical (in)coherence in discourse. Discourse Processes, 28, 139–154.

Shinjo, M., & Myers, J. L. (1987). The role of context in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 226–241.

Shklovsky, V. (1917/1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds. and Trans.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–57). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Simpson, G. B. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 120–136.

Simpson, G. B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 316–340.

Simpson, G. B. (1994). Context and the processing of ambiguous words. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 359–374). San Diego: Academic Press.

Simpson, G. B., & C. Burgess (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 28–39.

Simpson, G. B., & Foster, M. R. (1986). Lexical ambiguity and children's word recognition. Developmental Psychology, 22, 147–154.

Simpson, G. B., & Krueger, M. A. (1991), Selective access of homograph in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 627–643.

Small, S. I., Cottrell, G. W., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Smith, M. C. (1991). On the recruitment of semantic information for word fragment completion: evidence from bilingual priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 234–244.

Smith, N. & Wilson, D. (1992). Introduction. Lingua, 87, 1–10.

Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (1997). Productivity and propositional construal as the meshing of embodied representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 38–39.

Spence, S., Zaidel, E., & Kasher, A. (1990). The right hemisphere communication battery: Results from commissurotomy patients and normal subjects reveal only partial right hemisphere contribution. Journal of Comparative and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 42.

Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 130–136.

Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguity with multiple constraints. Cognition, 55, 227–267.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1–36.

Stein, G. (1922/1975). Miss Furr and Miss Skeene. In S. Cahill (Ed.), Women and fiction (pp. 42–48). New York: New American Library.

Stern, C, Prather, P., Swinney, D., & Zurif, E. B. (1991). The time course of automatic lexical access and aging. Brain and Language, 40, 359–372.

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

(p.238) Sundermeier, A. B., Marsolek, J. C, van den Broek, P., & Virtue, S. (2002, June). “Familiarity of causal inference scenarios during comprehension: Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms.” Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual Meeting of The Society for Text and Discourse, Chicago.

Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: The mind-body metaphor in semantic structure and semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swift, J. (1729/1971). A modest proposal for preventing the children of the poor from being a burthen to their parents or country, and for making them beneficial to the public. In T Scott (Ed.), The prose works of Jonathan Swift (pp. 205–216). New York: American Mathematical Society Press.

Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Reconsideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659.

Swinney, D. J., & Prather, P. A. (1989). On the comprehension of lexical ambiguity by young children: Investigations into development of mental modularity. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), Resolving semantic ambiguity (pp. 225–238). New York: Springer Verlag.

Swinney, D., Zurif, E., & Nicol, J. (1989). The effects of focal brain damage on sentence processing: An examination of the neurological organization of a mental module. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 25–37

Tabossi, P. (1988). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 324–340.

Tabossi, P., Colombo, L., & Job, R. (1987). Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance. Psychological Research, 49, 161–167.

Tabossi, P., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., McRae, K., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Semantic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution: Evidence for a constraint-based resolution process. In C. Ultima & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 589–616). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tabossi, P., & Zardon, F. (1993). The activation of idiomatic meaning in spoken language comprehension. In C. Cacciari & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure and interpretation (pp. 145–162). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. N., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Do listeners compute linguistic representations? In D. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, theoretical and computational perspectives (pp. 359–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tanenhaus, M. K., Garnsey, S. M., & Boland, J. (1990). Combinatory lexical information and language comprehension. In G. T. M. Altamnn (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 383–408). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 161–167.

Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.

(p.239) Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition. Vol. 11: Speech, language and communication (pp. 217–262). San Diego: Academic Press.

Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., & Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 283–298.

Titone, D. (1998). Hemispheric differences in context sensitivity during lexical ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language, 65, 361–394.

Toplak, M., & Katz, A. N. (2000). On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1467–1488.

Tourangeau, R., & Rips, L. (1991). Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 454–472.

Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 27–55.

Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Understanding and appreciating metaphor. Cognition, 11, 203–244.

Traugott, E. C, & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Traugott, E. C, & König, E. (1991). The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. l, pp. 189–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Trueswell, J. C. (1996). The role of frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 566–585.

Trueswell, J. C, Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–318.

Trueswell, J. C, Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528–553.

Tsuyoshi, O., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse: Collaboration, overlap, and syntactic dissociation. In E. H. Hovy & D. R. Scott (Eds.), Computational and conversational discourse: Burning issues—An interdisciplinary account (pp. 67–96). Berlin: Springer.

Tulving, E., & Gold, C. (1963). Stimulus information and contextual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 319–327.

Turner, N. E., & Katz, A. (1997). Evidence for the availability of conventional and of literal meaning during the comprehension of proverbs. Pragmatics and Cognition, 5, 203–237.

Tyler, L. K., & Wessels, J. (1983). Quantifying contextual contributions to word recognition processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 409–420.

Tyler, L. K., & Wessels, J. (1985). Is gating an on-line task? Evidence from naming latency data. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 217–222.

Ullman, M., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., & Pinker, S. (1997). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and the grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognition and Neuroscience, 9, 266–276.

Utsumi, A. (2000). Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1777–1807.

(p.240) Vaid, J., Heredia, R., Hull, R., Martinez, F, & Gerkens, D. (2001, November). On getting a joke: Multiple meaning activation in humor comprehension. Poster presented at the Forty-second Annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Orlando, Florida.

Vaid, J., Hull, R., Gerkens, D., & Heredia, R. R. (2000, November). The time course of script activation in verbal humor processing. Poster presented at the Forty-first Annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society. New Orleans, Louisiana.

Vaid, J., Hull, R., Heredia, R., Gerkens, D., & Martinez, F. (in press). Getting a joke: The time course of meaning activation in verbal humor. Journal of Pragmatics.

Van Lancker D. R. & Kempler, D. (1987). Comprehension of familiar phrases by left-but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 32, 265–277.

Van Lancker D. R. & Kempler, D. (1993). Acquisition and loss of familiar language: Idiom and proverb comprehension. In F. R. Eckman (Ed.), Confluence: Linguistics, 12 acquisition and speech pathology (pp. 249–257). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Van de Voort, M. E. C, & Vonk, W. (1995). You don't die immediately when you kick an empty bucket: A processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristics of idioms. In M. Everaert, E-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (pp. 283–299). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Van Petten, C. (1995). Words and sentences: Event-related brain potential measures. Pyschophysiology, 32, 511–525.

Van Petten, C, Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). The course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1–24.

Van Petten, C, & Kutas, M. (1991). Electrophysiological evidence for the flexibility of lexical processing. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 129–174). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Verschueren, J. (1995). The pragmatic return to meaning: Notes on the dynamics of communication, degrees of salience, and communicative transparency. Journal of Anthropology, 5, 127–153.

Verschueren, J. (1998). Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.

Vu, H., Kellas, G., Metcalf, K., & Herman, R. (2000). The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory & Cognition, 28, 236–252.

Vu, H., Kellas, G., & Paul, S. T. (1998). Sources of sentence constraint in lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory & Cognition, 26, 979–1001.

Wallach, Y. (1997). Wild light. Trans. Linda Zisquit. Riverdale-on-Hudson, NY: Sheep Meadow Press.

Wedel, J., & Sherman-Ussishkin, A. (1999, July! Entropy and language structure: Toward an explanation of regularity in Creole grammar. Paper presented at the Sixth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.

Weiner, J. E. (1996). Why is a riddle not like a metaphor? In J. Hulstijn & A. Nijholt (Eds.), Automatic interpretation and generation of verbal humor (pp. 111–119). IWCH ‘96. Twente Workshop on Language and Technology 12. Enschede: University of Twente.

Weldon, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 526–541.

Weldon, M. S., Roediger H. L., & Challis, B. H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain in picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 95–105.

(p.241) West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1988). How much of sentence priming is word priming? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 1–4.

Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 143–154.

Whitney, P., Waring, D. A., & Zingmark, B. (1992). Task effects on the spontaneous activation of trait concepts. Social Cognition, 10, 377–396.

Wiley, J., & Rayner, K. (2000). Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1011–1021.

Williams, J. N. (1992). Processing polysemous words in context: Evidence from interrelated meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 193–218.

Wilson, D. (1998). Discourse, coherence and relevance: A reply to Rachel Giora. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 51–74.

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87, 53–76.

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua, 90, 1–25.

Winner, E. (1988). The point of words: Children's understanding of metaphor and irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Winner, E., Levy, J., Kaplan, J., & Rosenblatt, E. (1988). Children's understanding of nonliteral language. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22, 51–63.

Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2000). Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 529–541.

Wu, L. (1995). Perceptual representation in conceptual combination. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.

Yus, F. (1998). A decade of relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 305–345.

Yus, F. (2001). On reaching the intended ironic interpretation. International Journal of Communication, 10, 27–78.

Zaidel, D. W., & Kasher, A. (1989). Hemispheric memory for surrealistic versus realistic paintings. Cortex, 25, 617–641.

Zaidel, D. W., Zaidel, E., Oxbury, S. M., & Oxbury, J. M. (1995). The interpretation of sentence ambiguity in patients with unilateral focal brain surgery. Brain and Language, 51, 458–468.

Zaidel, E. (1979). Performance on the ITPA following cerebral commissurotomy and hemispherectomy. Neuropsychologia, 17, 259–280.

Zaidel, E. (1987). Hemispheric monitoring. In D. Ottoson (Ed.), Duality and unity of the brain, 247–281. Hampshire: Macmillan.

Zaidel, E., Kasher, J., Giora, R., Batori, G., Soroker, N., & Graves, D. (2000) Hemispheric control of basic speech acts: Evidence from unilateral brain damage. Unpublished ms.

Zaidel, E., Kasher, J., Soroker, N., & Batori, G. (2002). Effects of right and left hemisphere damage on performance of the “Right Hemisphere Communication Battery.” Brain and Language, 80, 510—535.

Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.

Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preference need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp.31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(p.242) Zuckerman, G. (1999, December). “Phono-semantic matching” as a means of lexical enrichment: Comparative analysis of lvrit, Turkish, Chinese, and Japanese. Paper presented at the Linguistics Colloquium, Tel Aviv University.

Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25–64.