Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Understanding GenocideThe Social Psychology of the Holocaust$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Leonard S. Newman and Ralph Erber

Print publication date: 2002

Print ISBN-13: 9780195133622

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195133622.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 November 2017

Explaining the Holocaust

Explaining the Holocaust

Does Social Psychology Exonerate the Perpetrators?

Chapter:
(p.301) 13 Explaining the Holocaust
Source:
Understanding Genocide
Author(s):

Arthur G. Miller

Amy M. Buddie

Jeffrey Kretschmar

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195133622.003.0014

This chapter examines the proposition that social-psychological explanations of the Holocaust tend to exonerate perpetrators. It suggests that social-psychological explanations may be viewed as relatively condoning toward the perpetrators of genocide. It argues that the most central, defining feature of social psychology — one that distinguishes social psychology from other disciplines such as personality, developmental, or clinical psychology — is an emphasis on social influence, or what Ross and Nishett (1991) term the “power of the situation”. The main point is that social-psychological explanations, in emphasizing the causal power of situational forces, construe actors committing harmful actions as having relatively low personal responsibility and intentionality for their actions, and, in some instances, a low degree of conscious awareness of the determinants of their behaviors. A prototypical experiment in social psychology — for example, on aggression, helping behavior, prejudice, or conformity — randomly assigns participants to different conditions. The logic of random assignment permits the social psychologist to interpret behavior as caused by the situation or by the participant's definition of the situation into which he or she was placed.

Keywords:   Holocaust, genocide, perpetrators, social psychology, aggression, random assignment, social influence, responsibility, intentionality

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .