Methodological Issues Regarding Cancer Anorexia/Cachexia Trials
This chapter reviews information regarding conducting and analyzing trials designed to test potential agents for alleviating cancer-related anorexia/cachexia. The information was derived from experience generated by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) in conducting a series of ten trials which, to date, have entered over 2000 patients. As with any research endeavor, the study of anorexia/cachexia is difficult and fraught with potential pitfalls. The discussion here may aid in the standardization of design and analytic approaches for anorexia/cachexia trials so that a meta-analytic process, formal or otherwise, may be facilitated. The overriding principle has been to keep the process as simple as possible due to the many potentially concomitant confounding influences. If the treatments applied to anorexia/cachexia do not produce profound results in the presence of substantial systemic noise, then they are not likely to be seen as efficacious in the community clinical environment beyond the clinical trials setting.
Keywords: eating disorder, cancer-related anorexia, North Central Cancer Treatment Group, design standardization, clinical trials, systemic noise
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .