Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Democracy in the WoodsEnvironmental Conservation and Social Justice in India, Tanzania, and Mexico$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Prakash Kashwan

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780190637385

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2017

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190637385.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 November 2017

Politics of “Development” and National Forestland Regimes

Politics of “Development” and National Forestland Regimes

Chapter:
(p.57) Chapter 3 Politics of “Development” and National Forestland Regimes
Source:
Democracy in the Woods
Author(s):

Prakash Kashwan

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190637385.003.0004

This chapter demonstrates that political mediation of the contested meanings and politics of development shaped the postcolonial allocation of property rights in the hinterlands of India, Tanzania, and Mexico. It shows that the extremely skewed balance of power between peasants and politicians in India and Tanzania led to the installation of centralized regimes of forestland regimes, which leaders justified in the name of national development and which led over time to the creation of large networks of state forests and protected areas. In Mexico, a politically mobilized peasantry that enjoyed political legitimacy and benefitted from an effective welfare state secured control of more than 60 percent of the country’s forests—ultimately leading to Mexico’s development of the world’s most successful community forestry program. These findings contradict the argument that economic development and nature conservation are fundamentally in conflict and provides evidence about the political roots of socially just environmental protection policies.

Keywords:   commanding heights, international conservation, development studies, power, postcolonialism, social justice, welfare state, centralization, Arusha Declaration, Project Tiger

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .