Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Transformation of Human Rights Fact-Finding$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Philip Alston and Sarah Knuckey

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780190239480

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190239480.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

Commissions of Inquiry and the Charm of International Criminal Law

Commissions of Inquiry and the Charm of International Criminal Law

Between Transactional and Authoritative Approaches

Chapter:
(p.233) 12. Commissions of Inquiry and the Charm of International Criminal Law
Source:
The Transformation of Human Rights Fact-Finding
Author(s):

Larissa van den Herik

Catherine Harwood

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190239480.003.0012

This chapter analyzes the consequences of the same body of law being utilized by different entities for different purposes. It specifically compares the use of international criminal law by international criminal courts and by human rights commissions of inquiry. The chapter first situates modern human rights commissions of inquiry within the broader institutional fact-finding framework of the UN and examines how these make use of international criminal law. The approaches of various commissions are then compared and contrasted with judicial approaches, especially in terms of their interpretation and application of international criminal law. The slightly divergent approaches of commissions of inquiry are justified through the idea of “legitimate difference.” Concretely, these justifications relate to the distinct mandates and functions of the commissions. The chapter concludes with some thoughts on the ramifications of these divergences. It suggests that criminal courts should not automatically give precedential value to commission findings.

Keywords:   international criminal law, legitimate difference, distinctiveness of mandates, precedential value, commission findings

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .