International Policy Benchmarking and Education Reforms
This chapter addresses the question of international education reform in terms of globality. Did American school reform policies benchmark Asian counterparts to narrow the international education deficit and achievement gap over the past decades? What lessons can the American education system learn from high-performing Asian nations? The international comparison reveals both positive and negative aspects of the American school system in comparison with Asian counterparts including South Korea. While the United States instituted more centralized curriculum and high-stakes testing to improve academic achievement and accountability, Korea decentralized and loosened national curriculum and testing to improve student attitudes and creativity. Despite educational benchmarking efforts between the two countries, policy impacts on student outcomes were tenuous, and their gaps in student outcomes persist. It is argued that American education needs to achieve better balance: building on its strengths in creativity and pedagogy while addressing deficiencies in curriculum standards and teacher quality.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.