Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Anatomy of Achievement GapsWhy and How American Education is Losing (but can still Win) the War on Underachievement$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jaekyung Lee

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780190217648

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: December 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190217648.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 March 2019

Brain Race

Brain Race

International Achievement Gaps and Educational Deficits

Chapter:
(p.233) 7 Brain Race
Source:
The Anatomy of Achievement Gaps
Author(s):

Jaekyung Lee

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190217648.003.0008

This chapter addresses the question of international achievement gaps in terms of globality. How well do US students fare against peers in other developed countries? What key family and school factors account for international achievement gaps? A comparison of the math achievement trajectory between the United States and other nations shows that American students learn less than East Asian counterparts during middle school years and that the gap is attributable to between-country differences in the learning environment (e.g., curriculum standards, teacher quality, student engagement). A comparison of social achievement gaps in the United States and Korea shows that the two countries have similarly large achievement gaps between high- and low-socioeconomic (SES) students but different inequality mechanisms. In Korea, family SES tends to affect students’ achievement gaps primarily through differential private tutoring opportunities, whereas American family SES tends to affect students’ achievement gap primarily through differential schooling opportunities and teacher quality.

Keywords:   globality, comparative education, international achievement gap, family effects, school effects, private tutoring, teacher quality, Korean education

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .