Alberti, L. B. 1435/1991. On Painting, trans. C. Grayson. London: Penguin Books.
Armstrong, D. 1961. Perception and the Physical World. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bach, K. 1970. Part of what a picture is. British Journal of Aesthetics 10: 119–37.
Baxandall, M. 1988. Painting and Experience in Fifteenth‐Century Italy, new edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berkeley, G. 1710/1982. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Indianapolis: Hackett.
—— 1713/1979. Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Bernhard, T. 1992. Old Masters, trans. E. Osers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Block, N. 1983. The photographic fallacy in the debate about mental imagery. Noûs 17/4: 651–61.
Broad, C. D. 1953. The theory of sensa. In Swartz 1965.
Busey, T. A., Brady, N. P., and Cutting, J. E. 1990. Compensation is unnecessary for the perception of faces in slanted pictures. Perception & Psychophysics 48/1: 1–11.
Carnap, R. 1958. Introduction to Symbolic Logic and its Applications. New York: Dover.
Casati, R. and Varzi, A. 1999. Parts and Places. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Court, E. 1990. Poster presented at the IVth European Conference on Developmental Psychology, University of Stirling, Scotland, August 27–31.
Coxeter, H. S. M. 1993. The Real Projective Plane. Springer‐Verlag.
Cutting, J. E. 1987. Rigidity in cinema seen from the front row, side aisle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13: 323–34.
—— 1988. Affine distortions of pictorial space: some predictions for Goldstein (1987) that La Gournerie (1859) might have made. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14: 305–11.
Danto, A. 1997. After the End of Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
(p.250) Dretske, F. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Elkins, J. 1994. The Poetics of Perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Feagin, S. 1998. Presentation and representation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56/3: 234–40.
Firth, R. 1949–50. Sense‐data and the percept theory. Mind 58/232: 434–65, 59/233: 35–56. In Swartz 1965.
Fodor, J. 1990. A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibson, J. J. 1954. A theory of pictorial perception. Audio‐Visual Communication Review 2: 3–23.
—— 1960. Pictures, perspective, and perception. Daedalus 89: 216–27.
—— 1971. The information available in pictures. Leonardo 4: 27–35.
Goldstein, E. B. 1979. Rotation of objects in pictures viewed at an angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5: 78–87.
—— 1987. Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13: 256–66.
Gombrich, E. 1961. Art and Illusion, 2nd edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
—— 1972. The mask and the face: the perception of physiognomic likeness in life and in art. In M. Mandelbaum (ed.) Art, Perception, and Reality. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Goodman, N. 1972. Problems and Projects. Indianapolis: Bobbs‐Merrill.
—— 1976. Languages of Art, 2nd edn. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Goodman, N. and Elgin, C. Z. 1988. Reconceptions in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Greenberg, C. 1960. Modernist painting. In O'Brien (ed.), Clement Greenberg: The Collected Essays and Criticism, vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hagen, M. (ed.) 1980. The Perception of Pictures Vol. 1. Alberti's Window: The Projective Model of Pictorial Information. New York: Academic Press.
Hagen, M. 1986. Varieties of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halloran, T. O. 1989. Picture perception is array specific: viewing angle versus apparent orientation. Perception & Psychophysics 45: 467–82.
Haugeland, J. 1983. Analog and analog. Philosophical Topics 12: 213–26.
—— 1991 Representational genera. In W. Ramsey, S. Stich, and D. Rumelhart (eds.) Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Reprinted in Haugeland 1998.
(p.251) —— 1998. Having Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hecht, H., Schwartz, R., and Atherton, M. (eds.). 2003. Looking into Pictures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Heller, M. A. 1989. Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and blind: the advantage of the late blind. Perception 18: 379–89.
Hochberg, J. 1972. The representation of things and people. In M. Mandelbaum (ed.) Art, Perception, and Reality. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hopkins, R. 1995. Explaining depiction. Philosophical Review 104/3: 425–55.
—— 1998. Picture, Image, and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—— 2000. Touching pictures. British Journal of Aesthetics 40/1: 149–67.
—— 2003. Perspective, convention, and compromise. In Hecht, Schwartz, and Atherton (eds.) 2003.
Ittleson, W. H. 1952. The Ames Demonstrations in Perception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kemp, M. (ed.) 1989. Leonardo on Painting. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kennedy, J. M. 1993. Drawing and the Blind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kennedy, J. M. and Fox, N. 1977. Pictures to see and pictures to touch. In B. Leondar (ed.) The Arts and Cognition. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press: 118–35.
Koenderink, J., van Doorn, A., Kappers, A., and Todd, J. 2004. Pointing out of the picture. Perception 33: 513–30.
Kubovy, M. 1986. The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kulvicki, J. 2003. Image structure. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61/4: 323–40.
—— 2004. Isomorphism in information‐carrying systems. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85: 380–95.
Lederman, S. J., Klatzky, R. L., Chataway, C., and Summers, C. 1990. Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two‐dimensional pictures of common objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 114: 33–49.
Levinson, J. 1998. Wollheim on pictorial representation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56/3: 227–33.
Locke, J. 1690/1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. P. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lopes, D. 1995. Pictorial realism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53/3: 277–85.
(p.252) Lopes D. 1996. Understanding Pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—— 1997. Art media and the sense modalities: tactile pictures. Philosophical Quarterly 47/189: 425–40.
—— 2002. Vision, touch, and the value of pictures. British Journal of Aesthetics 42/2: 191–201.
Meskin, A. 2000. Comments on John Kulvicki's ‘What's so special about linear perspective?’. American Philosophical Association, Pacific Division, Albuquerque, NM.
Moore, G. E. 1903. The refutation of idealism. Mind 12/48: 433–53.
—— 1918. Some judgments of perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 19: 1–29. In Swartz 1965.
—— 1953. Sense data. In Some Main Problems in Philosophy. London: George, Allen & Unwin.
Neander, K. 1987. Pictorial representation: a matter of resemblance. British Journal of Aesthetics 27: 213–26.
Newall, M. 2003. A restriction for pictures and some consequences for a theory of depiction. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61/4: 381–94.
Nicholls, A. L and Kennedy, J. M. 1992. Drawing development: from similarity of features to direction. Child Development 63: 227–41.
Peacocke, C. 1987. Depiction. Philosophical Review 96: 383–410.
Pirenne, M. 1970. Optics, Painting, and Photography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Price, H. H. 1950. Perception, rev. edn. London: Methuen.
Pring, L. 1992. More than meets the eye. In R. Campbell (ed). Mental Lives. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rogers, S. 1995. Perceiving pictorial space. In W. Epstein and S. Rogers (eds.) Perception of Space and Motion. San Diego: Academic Press: 119–63.
Rosinski, R. R. and Farber, J. 1980. Compensation for viewing point in the perception of pictured space. In Hagen 1980.
Russell, B. 1914. Our Knowledge of the External World. London: Routledge.
Schier, F. 1986. Deeper into Pictures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schoch, R., Mende, M., and Scherbaum, A. 2001. Albrecht Dürer: das druckgraphische Werk, vol. 1. Munich: Prestel.
Shoemaker, S. 1994. Phenomenal character. Noûs 28/1: 21–38.
—— 1996. The First Person Perspective and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smart, J. J. C. 1975. On some criticisms of a physicalist theory of color. In C. Chueng (ed.) Physicalism and the Mind‐Body Problem. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Sober, E. 1976. Mental representations. Synthese 33: 101–48.
(p.253) Sorensen, R. 2002. The art of the impossible. In T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne (eds.) Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Swartz, R. J. (ed.) 1965. Perceiving, Sensing, and Knowing. New York: Anchor Books.
Thompson, L. J., Chronicle, E. P., and Collins, A. F. 2003. The role of pictorial convention in haptic picture perception. Perception 32/7: 887–93.
Topper, D. 2000. On anamorphosis: setting some things straight. Leonardo 33: 115–24.
Van Cleve, J. and Frederick, R. (eds.) 1991. The Philosophy of Right and Left. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Walton, K. 1973. Pictures and make‐believe. Philosophical Review 82: 283–319.
—— 1990. Mimesis as Make‐Believe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Willats, J. 1997. Art and Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
—— 2003. Optical laws or symbolic rules? In Hecht, Schwartz, and Atherton (eds.) 2003.
Wollheim, R. 1980. Art and its Objects, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—— 1987. Painting as an Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
—— 1993. The Mind and its Depths. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
—— 1998. On pictorial representation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56: 217–26.
Yang, T. and Kubovy, M. 1999. Weakening the robustness of perspective: evidence for a modified theory of compensation in picture perception. Perception and Psychophysics 61/3: 456–67. (p.254)