Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Building Europe's ParliamentDemocratic Representation Beyond the Nation State$

Berthold Rittberger

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780199273423

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: July 2005

DOI: 10.1093/0199273421.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 17 August 2017

(p.210) Bibliography

(p.210) Bibliography

Source:
Building Europe's Parliament
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bulletin of the European Communities (EC Bulletin)

Deutscher Bundestag (resolutions)

Deutscher Bundestag, 4. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 4/1104, 15/05/1964.

Deutscher Bundestag, 4. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 4/1660, 23/11/1963.

Deutscher Bundestag, 4. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 4/2211 and 4/2212, 28/04/1964.

Deutscher Bundestag, 10. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 10/3152, 09/04/1985.

Deutscher Bundestag, 10. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 10/3564, 26/06/1985.

Deutscher Bundestag, 10. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 10/3569, 26/06/1985.

Deutscher Bundestag (debates)

Deutscher Bundestag, 5. Wahlperiode, 17. Sitzung, 27/01/1966.

Deutscher Bundestag, 6. Wahlperiode, 9. Sitzung, 06/11/1969.

Deutscher Bundestag, 6. Wahlperiode, 16. Sitzung, 03/12/1969.

Deutscher Bundestag, 6. Wahlperiode, 60. Sitzung, 18/06/1970.

Deutscher Bundestag, 6. Wahlperiode, 77. Sitzung, 06/11/1970.

Deutscher Bundestag, 10. Wahlperiode, 149. Sitzung, 27/06/1985.

Deutscher Bundestag, 10. Wahlperiode, 181. Sitzung, 05/12/1985.

Deutscher Bundestag, 10. Wahlperiode, 246. Sitzung, 13/11/1986.

Deutscher Bundestag, 10. Wahlperiode, 253. Sitzung, 04/12/1986.

European Commission (1998). The European Union: “A View from the Top”, Top Decision Makers and the European Union, <http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg10/epo/eb‐top/en/top.pdf> (accessed on 20 January 2002).

European Commission (2001). European Governance. A White Paper, COM(2001) 428 final, <http://europe.eu.int/eur‐lex/en/com/2001/com2001_428en01.pdf> (accessed 15 August 2001) .

European Parliament (1970). Les ressources propres aux Communautés européennes et les pouvoirs budgétaires du Parlement européen: recueil de documents, Luxembourg: Official Publications of the European Communities.

European Parliament (1971). Die Eigenmittel der Europäischen Gemeinschaften und die Haushaltsbefugnisse des Europäischen Parlaments: Die Ratifizierungsdebatten, Luxembourg: Official Publications of the European Communities.

European Parliament (1988). Political Parties in the EC and European Unification, Luxembourg: European Parliament (Directorate General for Research).

European Parliament (1996). White Paper on the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference, Vol. II, <http://europa.eu.int/en/agenda/igc‐home/eu‐doc/parlmentpeen2.htm>.

(p.211) Hansard, House of Commons

Hansard Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, Session 1985–86, Sixth Series, Vol. 87: 20/11/1985.

Hansard Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, Session 1985–86, Sixth Series, Vol. 88: 05/12/1985.

Hansard Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, Session 1985–86, Sixth Series, Vol. 93: 05/03/1986.

Hansard Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, Session 1985–86, Sixth Series, Vol. 96: 23/04/1986.

Hansard Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, Session 1985–86, Sixth Series, Vol. 100: 26/06/1986.

House of Commons—Reports

House of Commons (1990a). Second Report from the Foreign Affairs Committee, European Council, Rome 14–15 December 1990, Minutes of Evidence, Session 1990–91.

House of Commons (1990b). Second Report from the Foreign Affairs Committee, Session 1989–90, The Operation of the Single Market, Observations by the Government.

House of Lords—Reports

House of Lords (1985). Select Committee on the European Communities, 14th Report.

House of Lords (2001). Select Committee on European Union, 7th Report.

Journal Officiel de la République Française, Débats Parlementaires, Assemblée Nationale

Journal Officiel du 5 Novembre 1970, séance du 4 Novembre 1969.

Journal Officiel du 26 Juin 1970, séance du 23 Juin 1970.

Journal Officiel du 12 Juin 1985, séance du 11 Juin 1985.

Journal Officiel du 21 Novembre 1986, séance du 20 Novembre 1986.

Official Journal of the European Communities

Official Journal B 030, 20/04/1962: 0991–0993, EEC Council: Regulation No 25 on the financing of the common agricultural policy, EUR‐Lex database, <http://europa.eu.int/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi! prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN &numdoc=31962R0025&model=guicheti> (accessed 1 July 2002).

AAPD—Institut für Zeitgeschichte. Akten zur Auswärtigen Politik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, München: Oldenbourg [1949/50, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1969, 1970].

HAEC, AA/PA.SFSP (Auswärtiges Amt, Sekretariat für Fragen des Schuman‐Plans), Historical Archives of the European Communities, Florence.

HAEC, Emile Noël, EN 112, Historical Archives of the European Communities, Florence.

HAEC, Jean Monnet, Duchêne Sources—JMDS.A‐07.02‐000073: Schuman Plan and the Belgian Response, Historical Archives of the European Communities, Florence.

HAEC, Jean Monnet, Duchêne Sources—JMDS.A‐07.02‐000074: U.S. National Archives: US‐NA, RG 59, State Department, 850.33, Schuman Plan, Historical Archives of the European Communities, Florence.

HAEC, MAEF—Délégation française, PS (Plan Schuman), Historical Archives of the European Communities.

HAEC, MAEF.DECE‐05.02, MAEF 1124 (Ministère des Affaires Etrangères Français, Questions institutionnelles, administratives, budgétaires), Historical Archives of the European Communities.

Möller, H. and Hildebrand K. (eds.) (1997). Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Frankreich: Dokumente 1949–1963, Band 1—Außenpolitik und Diplomatie.

Agence Europe

Le Monde

Philip Budden, Cabinet Office, 23 April 2002, London.

Richard Corbett, MEP, 22 January 2004, Brussels.

Andrew Duff, MEP, 21 January 2004.

Matthias Schauer, Permanent Representative of Germany to the EU, 11 July 2000, Brussels.

Michael Shackleton, European Parliament Secretariat, 13 March 2000, Brussels.

Dr. Joachim Wuermeling, MEP, 21 January 2004, Brussels.

(p.213) References

Abelshauser, W. (1994). ‘ “Integration à la Carte”. The Primacy of Politics and the Economic Integration of Western Europe in the 1950s’, in S. Martin (ed.), The Construction of Europe—Essays in Honour of Emile Noël. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Abromeit, H. (1995). ‘Volkssouveränität, Parlamentssouveränität, Verfassungssouveränität: Drei Realmodelle der Legitimation staatlichen Handelns’. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 36(1): 49–66.

—— (2000). ‘Kompatbilität und Akzeptanz—Anforderungen an eine “integrierte Politie” ’, in E. Grande und M. Jachtenfuchs (eds.), Wie problemlösungsfähig ist die EU? Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

Adenauer, K. (1965). Erinnerungen, 1945–1953, Stuttgart: Deutscher Bücherbund.

Archibugi, D., Held, D., and Köhler, M. (eds.) (1998). Re‐imagining Political Community. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Aspinwall, M. D. and Schneider, G. (2000). ‘Same Table, Separate Menu. The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration.’ European Journal of Political Research 38(1):1–36.

Attali, J. (1993). Verbatim Tome 1, Chronique des années 1981–1986. Paris: Fayard.

Auel, K. and Benz, A. (2004). ‘Expanding National Parliamentary Control: Does it Further European Democracy’, unpublished manuscript.

Bates, R. H. (1998). ‘The International Coffee Organization: An International Institution’, in R. H. Bates, A. Greif, M. Levi, J.‐L. Rosenthal, and B. R. Weingast (eds.), Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Baumann, R., Rittberger, V., and Wagner, W. (1999). ‘Macht und Machtpolitik. Neorealistische Auaenpolitiktheorie und Prognosen über die deutsche Auaenpolitik nach der Vereinigung’. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 6(2): 245–86.

—— —— —— (2001). ‘Neorealist Foreign Policy Theory’, in V. Rittberger (ed.), German Foreign Policy since Unification. Theories and Case Studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Bennett, A. and George, A. L. (1997). ‘Research Design Tasks in Case Study Methods’, paper presented at the MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, 17–19 October 1997, <http://www.georgetown.edu/bennett/RESDES.htm> (accessed on 24 July 2002).

Bergman, T. and Raunio, T. (2001). ‘Parliaments and policy‐making in the European Union’, in J. Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and Policy‐Making. London: Routledge.

Bitsch, M.‐T. (1999). Histoire de la construction européenne de 1945 à nos jours. Bruxelles: Complexe.

—— (2001). ‘Le sommet de la Haye. La mise en route de la relance de 1969’, in W. Loth (ed.), Crisis and Compromises: The European Project 1963–1969. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

Blinder, A. S. (1987). ‘The Rules‐versus‐Discretion Debate in the Light of Recent Experience’. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 123(3): 399–414.

(p.214) Blyth, M. (2002). Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Political Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bowler, S. and Farrell, D. (1995). ‘The Organizing of the European Parliament: Committees, Specialization and Co‐ordination’. British Journal of Political Science 25(2): 219–43.

Börzel, T. A. (2000). ‘Europäisierung und innerstaatlicher Wandel. Zentralisierung und Entparlamentarisierung?’ Politische Vierteljahresschrift 41(2): 225–50.

Bräuninger, T., Cornelius, T., König, T. and Schuster, T. (2001). ‘The dynamics of European integration: a constitutional analysis of the Amsterdam Treaty’, in G. Schneider and M. Aspinwall (eds.), The Rules of Integration. Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Brehon, N.‐J. (1997). Le budget de l'Europe. Paris: L.G.D.J.

Budden, P. (1994). The United Kingdom and the European Community, 1979–1986. The making of the Single European Act. D.Phil. thesis. Oxford.

Buller, J. (2000). National Statecraft and European Integration. The Conservative Government and the European Union, 1979–1997. London: Pinter.

Burns, T. R. (2000). ‘The Future of Parliamentary Democracy: Transition and Challenge in European Governance’. Green Paper prepared for the Conference of the Speakers of EU Parliaments, 22–24 September 2000, Rome.

Caporaso, J. A. (1997). ‘Does the European Union Represent an n of 1?’, <http://www.eustudies.org/N1debate.htm> (accessed on 17 October 2003).

Cederman, L.‐E. (2001). ‘Nationalism and Bounded Integration: What it Would Take to Construct a European Demos’. European Journal of International Relations 7(2): 139–74.

Coombes, D. (1972). The Power of the Purse in the European Communities. London: Chatham House.

Corbett, R. (1987). ‘The 1985 Intergovernmental Conference and the Single European Act’, in R. Price (ed.), The Dynamics of European Union. London: Croom Helm.

—— (1992). The Treaty of Maastricht. From Conception to Ratification: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. Essex: Longman.

—— (1998). The European Parliament's Role in Closer Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

—— Jacobs, F., and Shackleton, M. (2000). The European Parliament, 4th edition. London: Catermill Publishing.

—— —— —— (2003). ‘The European Parliament at Fifty: A View from the Inside’. Journal of Common Market Studies 41(2): 353–73.

Costa, O. (2001). Le Parlement européen, assemblée délibérante. Brussels: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles.

Crombez, C. (1996). ‘Legislative Procedures in the European Community’. British Journal of Political Science 26(2): 199–228.

—— (2003). ‘The Democratic Deficit in the European Union. Much Ado about Nothing?’ European Union Politics 4(1): 101–20.

Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

—— (1994). ‘A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation’. Political Science Quarterly 109(1): 23–34.

(p.215) —— (1999). ‘Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic's view’, in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker‐Cordón (eds.), Democracy's Edges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— and Tufte, E. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Dalton, R. J., Cain, B. E., and Scarrow, S. E. (2003a). ‘Democratic Publics and Democratic Institutions’, in B. E. Cain, R. J. Dalton, and S. E. Scarrow (eds.), Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— J., Scarrow, S. E., and Cain, B. E. (2003b). ‘New Forms of Democracy? Reform and Transformations of Democratic Institutions’, in B. E. Cain, R. J. Dalton, and S. E. Scarrow (eds.), Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Decker, F. (2002). ‘Governance beyond the nation‐state. Reflections on the democratic deficit of the European Union’. Journal of European Public Policy 9(2): 256–72.

De Ruyt, J. (1989). L'Acte Unique Européen. Brussels: Institut d'Etudes Européen.

De Vree, J. (1974). ‘Parliament and the Political System: The Case of the European Parliament’, Symposium on European Integration and the Future of Parliaments in Europe, Luxembourg, 2–5 May 1974 (PE 35.663).

Diebold, W. (1959). The Schuman Plan. A Study in Economic Cooperation 1950–59. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.

Diez, T. (1999). Die EU lesen: Diskursive Knotenpunkte in der britischen Europadebatte. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1991). ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, in W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Doleys, T. J. (2000). ‘Member states and the European Commission: theoretical, insights from the new economics of organization’. Journal of European Public Policy 7(4): 532–53.

Donahue, J. D. and Pollack, Mark (2001). ‘Centralization and Its Discontents: The Rhythm of Federalism in the United States and the European Union’, in K. Nicolaïdis and R. Howse (eds.), The Federal Vision. Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Duchêne, F. (1994). Jean Monnet. The First Statesman of Interdependence. New York: Norton.

Earnshaw, D. and Judge, D. (1996). ‘From Co‐operation to Co‐decision: The European Parliament's Path to Legislative Power’, in J. Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and Policy‐Making. London: Routledge.

Eckstein, H. (1975). ‘Case Study and Theory in Political Science’, in F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. VII: Strategies of Inquiry. Reading, Mass.: Addison‐Wesley.

Elster, J. (1994). ‘Argumenter et négocier dans deux assemblées constituantes’. Revue Française de Science Politique 44(2): 187–256.

Elster, J. (1998) (ed.). Deliberative Democarcy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(p.216) —— (2000). ‘Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies’. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, <http://www.law.upenn.edu/conlaw/> (accessed on 10 December 2001).

Eriksen, E. O. and Fossum, J. E. (2000). Democracy in the European Union. Integration Through Deliberation? London: Routledge.

—— and Neyer, J. (2003). ‘Introduction: The Forging of Deliberative Supranationalism in the EU?’, in Erik Oddvar Eriksen, Christian Joerges and Jürgen Neyer (eds.), European Governance, Deliberation and the Quest for Democratisation. Oslo: ARENA Report No. 2/2003.

Falk, R. and Strauss, A. (2001). ‘Toward Global Parliament’. Foreign Affairs 80 (January–February): 212–20.

—— —— (2002). ‘Not a Parliament of Dreams’. Worldlink. The Magazine of the World Economic Forum, July, <http://www.worldlink.co.uk/stories/storyReader$1152> (accessed on 3 September 2002).

Farrell, H. and Héritier, A. (2003). ‘Continuous Constitution‐Building in Europe: Co‐Decision and Informal and Formal Institutions’. Governance 16(4): 577–600.

Fearon, J. and Wendt, A. (2002). ‘Rationalism and Constructivism in International Relations Theory, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations Theory. London: Sage Publications.

Featherstone, K. (1994). ‘Jean Monnet and the “democratic deficit” in the European Union’. Journal of Common Market Studies 32(2): 149–70.

Ferejohn, J. (1993). ‘Structure and Ideology: Change in Parliament in Early Stuart England’, in J. Goldstein and R. O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Finnemore, M. (1996). ‘Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism. International Organization 50(2): 325–47.

—— and Sikkink, K. (1998). ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52: 887–917.

Fishkin, J. S. and Laslett, P. (eds.) (2003). Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Florini, A. (1996): ‘The Evolution of International Norms’, International Studies Quarterly 40(3): 363–89.

Fontaine, P. (2000). A new idea for Europe. The Schuman declaration—1950–2000, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, <http://europa.eu. int/comm/dg10/publications/brochures/docu/50ans/en.pdf> (accessed on 8 July 2002).

Forster, A. (1999). Britain and the Maastricht Negotiations. Oxford: Macmillan/St Antony's.

Gaddum, E. (1994). Die deutsche Europapolitik in den 80er Jahren. Interessen, Konflikte und Entscheidungen der Regierung Kohl. Paderborn: Schönigh.

Garman, J. and Hilditch, L. (1998). ‘Behind the Scenes: An Examination of the Importance of Informal Processes at Work in Conciliation’. Journal of European Public Policy 5(2): 271–84.

Garrett, G. (1992). ‘International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market’. International Organization 46(2): 533–60.

(p.217) —— (1995). ‘From The Luxembourg Compromise to Codecision: Decision Making in the European Union’. Electoral Studies 14(3): 289–308.

—— and Tsebelis, G. (1996). ‘An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism’. International Organization 50(2): 269–99.

Gazzo, Marina (ed.) (1985). Towards European Union: From the “Crocodile” to the European Council in Milan (28–29 June 1985). Brussels: Agence Europe.

George, S. (1990). An Awkward Partner. Britain in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gerçek, K. (1998). ‘Die Europäische Gemeinschaft für Kohle und Stahl und ihr politisches Leitbild föderaler Organe’, in R. Hrbek and V. Schwarz (eds.), 40 Jahre Römische Verträge: Der deutsche Beitrag. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

Gillingham, J. (1991). Coal, steel, and the rebirth of Europe, 1945–1955. The Germans, the French from Ruhr conflict to economic community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— (2003). European Integration 1950–2003. Superstate or New Market Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. O. (1993). ‘Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework’, in J. Goldstein and R. O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Grant, C. (1988). Delors. Inside the House that Jacques Built. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Grieco, J. (1995). ‘The Maastricht Treaty, Economic and Monetary Union and the Neo‐realist Research Program’. Review of International Studies 21(1): 21–40.

Griffiths, R. T. (1988). ‘The Schuman Plan Negotiations: The Economic Clauses’, in K. Schwabe (ed.), Die Anfänge des Schuman Plans 1950/51—The Beginnings of the Schuman Plan. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

—— (1990). ‘Die Benelux‐Staaten und die Schumanplan‐Verhandlungen’, in L. Herbst, W. Bührer, and H. Sowade (eds.), Vom Marshallplan zur EWG. Die Eingliederung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland in die westliche Welt. München: Oldenbourg.

Große Hüttmann, M. (1996). ‘Das Subsidiaritätsprinzip in der Europäischen Union—eine Dokumentation’. Occasional Papers Nr. 5. Tübingen: Europäisches Zentrum für Föderalismus‐Forschung.

Guggenberger, B. (1995). ‘Demokratie/Demokratietheorie’, in D. Nohlen und R‐O. Schulze (eds.), Lexikon der Politik, Vol. I: Politische Theorien. München: C.H. Beck.

Hall, P. A. (1989). The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

—— (1993). ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state’. Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–96.

—— and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’. Political Studies 44(5): 936–57.

Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., and Rittberger, V. (1997). Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

(p.218) Held, D. (1997). ‘Democracy: From City‐states to a Cosmopolitan Order?’, in R. E. Goodin and P. Pettit (eds), Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Hennis, W. (1976). ‘Legitimität. Zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft’, in P. G. Kielmansegg (ed.), Legitimationsprobleme politischer Systeme, Sonderheft 7 der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Héritier, A., Knill, C., and Mingers, S. (1996). Ringing the Changes in Europe: Regulatory Competition and Redefinition of the State: Britain, France, Germany. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Hix, S. (1998). ‘Elections, Parties and Institutional Design: A Comparative Perspective on European Union Democracy’. West European Politics 21(3): 19–52.

—— (2001). ‘Legislative Behaviour and Party Competition in the European Parliament: An Application of Nominate to the EU’. Journal of Common Market Studies 39(4): 663–88.

—— (2002). Constitutional Agenda‐Setting Through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won At Amsterdam’. British Journal of Political Science 32(2): 259–80.

—— (2005). The Political System of the European Union, 2nd edition. London: Palgrave.

—— and Lord, C. (1997). Political Parties in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

—— Raunio, T., and Scully, R. (2003). ‘Fifty Years On: Research on the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies 41(2): 191–202.

Hobsbawm, E. (1990). Nations and Nationalism Since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hovey, J. A. (1966). The Superparliaments. Interparliamentary Consultation and Atlantic Cooperation. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.

Höreth, M. (1999). ‘No way out for the beast? The unsolved legitimacy problem of European governance’. Journal of European Public Policy 6(2): 249–68.

Howe, G. (1994). Conflict of Loyalty. London: Macmillan.

Hubschmid, C. and Moser, P. (1997). ‘The Co‐operation Procedure in the EU: Why was the EP Influential in the Decision on Car Emission Standards?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 35(2): 225–42.

Hurd, I. (1999). ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’. International Organization 53(2): 379–408.

Ikenberry, J. G. (1998). ‘Constitutional Politics in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 4(2): 147–77.

—— (2001). After Victory. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Jachtenfuchs, M. (1999). Ideen und Integration. Verfassungsideen in Deutschland, Frankreich und Groβbritannien und die Entwicklung der EU. Habilitationsschrift: Universität Mannheim.

—— (2002). Die Konstruktion Europas. Verfassungsideen und institutionelle Entwicklung. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

—— Diez, T., and Jung, S. (1998). ‘Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Political Order’. European Journal of International Relations 4(4): 409–45.

Jacobson, J. K. (1995). ‘Much ado about ideas: the cognitive factor in economic policy’. World Politics 47(2): 283–310.

(p.219) Jillson, C. (1988). Constitution Making: Conflict and Consensus in the Federal Convention of 1787. New York: Agathon Press

—— and Eubanks, C. (1984). ‘The Political Structure of Constitution‐Making’. American Journal of Political Science 28(3): 435–58.

Johnston, A. I. (1999). ‘Legitimation, Foreign Policy and the Sources of Realpolitik’, <http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/∼johnston/legitimacy.pdf> (accessed on 7 January 2002).

—— (2001). ‘Treating International Institutions as Social Environments’. International Studies Quarterly 45(3): 487–515.

Judge, D. and Earnshaw, D. (2003). The European Parliament. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

—— —— and Cowan, N. (1994). ‘Ripples or Waves: The European Parliament in the European Community Policy Process’. Journal of European Public Policy 1(1): 27–52.

Jupille, J. (2004). Procedural Politics. Issues, Influence, and Institutional Change in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Katz, R. S. (2001). ‘Models of Democracy: Elite Attitudes and the Democratic Deficit in the European Union’. European Union Politics 2(1): 53–80.

Katzenstein, P. J. (1993). ‘Coping with Terrorism: Norms and Internal Security in Germany and Japan’, in J. Goldstein and R. O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Keck, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

—— and Nye, J. (2000). ‘Introduction’, in Joseph Nye and John D. Donahue (eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Kersten, A. (1988). ‘A Welcome Surprise? The Netherlands and the Schuman Plan Negotiations’, in K. Schwabe (ed.), Die Anfänge des Schuman Plans 1950/51—The Beginnings of the Schuman Plan. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

Kielmansegg, P. G. (1997). ‘Legitimität als analytische Kategorie’, in W. Seibel, M. Medick‐Krakau, H. Münkler, und M. Th. Greven (eds.), Demokratische Politik—Analyse und Theorie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

—— (2003). ‘Integration und Demokratie’, in M. Jachtenfuchs und B. Kohler‐Koch (eds.), Europäische Integration, 2nd edition. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

Kluxen, K. (1983). Geschichte und Problematik des Parlamentarismus. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— (1995). ‘Models, Interpretations, and Theories: Constructing Explanations of Institutional Emergence and Change’, in Jack Knight and Itai Sened (eds.), Explaining Social Institutions. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Kreppel, A. (1999). ‘What Affects the European Parliament's Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of EP Amendments’. Journal of Common Market Studies 37(3): 521–38.

—— (2002). The European Parliament and Supranational Party System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— and Tsebelis, G. (1999). ‘Coalition Formation in the European Parliament’. Comparative Political Studies 32(8): 933–66.

(p.220) Küsters, H.‐J. (1988). ‘Die Verhandlungen über das institutionelle System zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft für Kohl and Stahl’, in K. Schwabe (ed.), Die Anfänge des Schuman Plans 1950/51—The Beginnings of the Schuman Plan. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

Laffan, Brigid (1997). The Finances of the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

—— (2000). ‘The big budgetary bargains: from negotiation to authority’. Journal of European Public Policy 7(5): 53–71.

—— and Lindner, J. (2005). ‘The Budget’, in William Wallace, Helen Wallace and Mark Pollack (eds.), Policy‐Making in the European Union, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press

—— and Shackleton, M. (2000). ‘The Budget. Who gets What, When, and How’, in H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds.), Policy‐Making in the European Union, 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lambert, J. (1966). ‘The Constitutional Crisis 1965–66’. Journal of Common Market Studies 4(3): 195–228.

Lappenküper, U. (1994). ‘Der Schuman‐Plan. Mühsamer Durchbruch zur deutsch–französischen Verständigung’. Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte 42(3): 403–45.

Legro, J. W. (1997). ‘Which norms matter? Revisiting the “failure” of internationalism’. International Organization 51(1): 311–63.

Lindner, J. (2003a). Conflict in EU budgetary politics: an institutionalist analysis. D.Phil. thesis. Oxford.

—— (2003b). ‘Institutional stability and change: two sides of the same coin’. Journal of European Public Policy 10(6): 912–35.

—— and Rittberger, B. (2003). ‘The Creation, Interpretation and Contestation of Institutions—Revisiting Historical Institutionalism’. Journal of Common Market Studies 41(3): 445–73.

Lindsay, K. (1960). European Assemblies. The Experimental Period 1949–1959. London: Stevens and Sons.

Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. London: Mercury Books.

Lynch, F. (1988). ‘The Role of Jean Monnet in Setting up the European Coal and Steel Community’, in K. Schwabe (ed.), Die Anfänge des Schuman Plans 1950/51—The Beginnings of the Schuman Plan. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

—— (ed.) (1996). Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.

—— (1998). ‘Europe's ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards’. European Law Journal 4(1): 5–28.

—— (2000). ‘The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation’. Journal of Common Market Studies 38(2): 273–302.

—— (2001). ‘Two Logics of Delegation. Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance’. European Union Politics 2(1): 103–22.

Major, J. (2000). John Major—The Autobiography. London: HarperCollins.

Mamadouh, V. and Raunio, T. (2003). ‘The Committee System: Powers, Appointments and Report Allocation’. Journal of Common Market Studies 41(2): 333–51.

Mankiw, G. (1990). ‘A Quick Refresher Course in Macroeconomics’. Journal of Economic Literature 28(4): 1645–60.

(p.221) March, J. G. and Olson, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.

—— —— (1998). ‘The institutional dynamics of international political orders’. International Organization 52: 943–59.

Marschall, S. (2002). ‘ “Niedergang” und “Aufstieg” des Parlamentarismus im Zeitalter der Denationalisierung’. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 33(2): 377–90.

Maurer, A. (1999). ‘(Co‐)Governing after Maastricht: The European Parliament's institutional performance 1994–1999. Lessons for the implementation of the Treaty of Amsterdam’. Working Paper POLI 104. European Parliament: DG for Research.

—— (2003). ‘The Legislative Powers and Impact of the European Parliament’. Journal of Common Market Studies 41(2): 227–47.

—— and Wessels, W. (2003). Das Europäische Parlament nach Amsterdam und Nizza: Akteur, Arena oder Alibi? Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

McLean, I. (2001). ‘Before and after Publius: the sources and influence of Madison's political thought’, paper presented at conference on James Madison's 250th Birthday, University of California, San Diego, March 2001 <http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/users/mclean/James%20Madison%20Jr.pdf> (accessed on 5 March 2002).

McNamara, K. (1998), The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Mezey, M. (1979). Comparative Legislatures. Durham: Duke University Press.

Milner, H. V. (1997). Interests, Institutions, and Information. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Milward, A. (1984). The Reconstruction of Western Europe 1945–1951. London: Routledge.

Mioche, P. (1988). ‘La patronat de la sidérurgie française et le Plan Schuman en 1950–1952: les apparences d'un combat et la réalité d'une mutation’, in K. Schwabe (ed.), Die Anfänge des Schuman Plans 1950/51—The Beginnings of the Schuman Plan. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

Monnet, J. (1978). Memoirs. London: Collins.

Moravcsik, A. (1991). ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community’. International Organization 45(1): 19–56.

—— (1993). ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community—A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’. Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.

—— (1997). ‘Does the European Union Represent an n of 1?’ <http://www.eustudies.org/N1debate.htm> (accessed on 17 October 2003).

—— (1998). The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

—— (2000). ‘De Gaulle Between Grain and Grandeur: The Political Economy of French EC Policy, 1958–1970 (Part 2)’. Journal of Cold War Studies 2(3): 4–68.

—— (2002). ‘In Defence of the “Democratic Deficit”: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union’. Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4): 603–24.

—— and Nicolaïdis, K. (1999). ‘Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions’. Journal of Common Market Studies 37(1): 59–85.

Moser, P. (1997). ‘A Theory of the Conditional Influence of the European Parliament in the Cooperation Procedure’. Public Choice 91(3–4): 333–50.

(p.222) Mosler, H. (1966). ‘Die Entstehung des Modells supranationaler und gewaltenteilender Staatenverbindungen in den Verhandlungen über den Schuman‐Plan’, in E. von Caemmerer, H‐J. Schlochauer und E. Steindorff (eds.), Probleme des Europäischen Rechts. Festschrift für Walter Hallstein zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. Frankfurt/Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

Newhouse, J. (1967). Collision in Brussels. The Common Market Crisis of 30 June 1965. London: Faber and Faber.

Niblock, M. (1971). The EEC: National Parliaments in Community Decision‐making. London: Chatham House.

Norman, P. (2003). The Accidental Constitution. The Story of the European Convention. Brussels: Eurocomment.

Norton, P. (1996). ‘Conclusion: Addressing the Democratic Deficit’, in P. Norton (ed.), National Parliaments and the European Union, London: Frank Cass.

—— (ed.) (1998). Parliaments and Governments in Western Europe. London: Frank Cass.

Nye, J. (2002) ‘Parliament of dreams. A global government is an unrealistic vision’. Worldlink. The Magazine of the World Economic Forum, March/April, <http://www.worldlink.co.uk/stories/storyReader$1088> (accessed on 22 July 2002).

Odell, J. S. (2000). ‘Case Study Methods in International Political Economy’. Columbia International Affairs Online, <http://www.ciaonet.org/isa/odj01/> (accessed on 24 July 2002).

Ougaard, M. and Richard, H. (eds.) (2002). Towards a Global Polity. London: Routledge.

Parsons, C. (2002). ‘Showing Ideas as Causes: The Origins of the European Union’. International Organization 56(1): 47–84.

—— (2003). A Certain Idea of Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Peters, G. (1999). Institutional Theory in Political Science. The ‘New Institutionalism’. London: Pinter.

Pollack, M. A. (n.d.). ‘Institutional Choice in the 1960s and 1970s: From The Hague to Paris’, unpublished manscript.

—— (1994). ‘Creeping Competence: The Expanding Agenda of the European Community’. Journal of Public Policy 14(2): 95–145.

—— (1997). ‘Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community’. International Organization 51(1): 99–134.

—— (1999). ‘Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the Treaty of Amsterdam’. European Integration Online Papers 3(6), <http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999–006a.htm>.

—— (2002). ‘Learning from Americanists (Again): Theory and Method in the Study of Delegation’. West European Politics 25(1): 200–19.

—— (2003). The Engines of Integration? Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Racine, R. (1954). Vers une Europe Nouvelle par le Plan Schuman. Neuchâtel: Editions de la Baconnière.

Rakove, J. N. (1997). Original Meanings. Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constituion. New York: Vintage Books.

—— (ed.) (2003). The Federalist. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Joy. The Essential Essays. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.

(p.223) Rasmussen, A. (2000). ‘Institutional Games Rational Actors Play: The Empowering of the European Parliament’. European Integration Online Papers 4 and 1, <http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000–001a.htm>

Raunio, T. (1997). The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989–1994 European Parliament. Aldershot: Ashgate.

—— (2004). ‘Two Steps Forward, One Step Back? National Legislatures in the EU Constitution’. The Federal Trust, <http://www.fedtrust.co.uk/uploads/constitution/Raunio.pdf> (accessed on 15 July 2004).

—— and Hix, S. (2000). ‘Backbenchers Learn to Fight Back: European Integration and Parliamentary Government’. West European Politics 23(4): 142–68.

Reich, C. (1991). ‘Qu'est‐ce que…le déficit démocratique?’. Révue du Marché Commun 343: 14–18.

Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against Populism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Risse‐Kappen, T. (1994). ‘Ideas Do Not Float Freely. Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War’. International Organization 48(2): 185–214.

Risse, T. (2000). ‘ “Let's Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics’. International Organization 54(1): 1–39.

—— Ropp, S. C., and Sikkink, K. (eds.) (1999). The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rittberger, B. (2000). ‘Impatient legislators and new issue‐dimensions: a critique of the Garrett‐Tsebelis “standard version” of legislative politics’. Journal of European Public Policy 7(4): 554–75.

—— (2001). ‘Which institutions for post‐war Europe? Explaining the institutional design of Europe's first community’. Journal of European Public Policy 8(5): 673–708.

Rittberger, V. (2000). ‘Globalisierung und der Wandel der Staatenwelt. Die Welt regieren ohne Weltstaat’, in U. Menzel (ed.), Vom Ewigen Frieden und vom Wohlstand der Nationen. Festschrift für Dieter Senghaas zum 60. Geburtstag. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

—— (ed.) (2001). German Foreign Policy Since Unification. Theories and Case Studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

—— and Zangl, B. (2003). Internationale Organisationen—Politik und Geschichte. Europäische und weltweite international Zusammenschlüsse, 3rd edition. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

Rosenau, J. and Czempiel, O. (eds.) (1995). Governance without Government. Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scalingi, P. (1980). The European Parliament. The Three‐decade Search for a United Europe. London: Aldwych Press.

Scarrow, S. E. (2003). ‘Making Elections More Direct? Reducing the Role of Parties in Elections’, in B. E. Cain, R. J. Dalton, and S. E. Scarrow (eds.), Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scharpf, F. W. (1970). Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.

—— (1997). ‘Economic Integration, Democracy and the Welfare State’. Journal of European Public Policy 4(1): 18–36.

(p.224) Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— (2001). ‘Democratic Legitimacy under Conditions of Regulatory Competition: Why Europe Differs from the United States’, in K. Nicolaïdis and R. Howse (eds.), The Federal Vision. Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schimmelfennig, F. (2001a). ‘The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’. International Organization 55(1): 47–80.

—— (2001b). ‘Strategic Action in a Community Environment. The Decision to Enlarge the European Union to the East’. European University Institute, unpublished manuscript.

—— (2003). The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe. Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmidt, M. G. (2000). Demokratietheorien. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

Schmitter, P. C. (1996). ‘Imagining the Future of the Euro‐Polity with the Help of New Concepts’, in G. Marks, F. W. Scharpf, P. C. Schmitter, and W. Streeck (eds.), Governance in the European Union, London: Sage.

—— (2001). ‘What is there to legitimise in the European Union…and how might this be accomplished?’ The Jean Monnet Working Papers, NYU School of Law, <http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/01/011401.html> (contribution to the Jean Monnet Working Paper No 6/01, ‘Symposium: Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance’).

Schneider, G. and Aspinwall, M. D. (eds.) (2001). The Rules of Integration. Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Schneider, H. (2002). ‘Gründe für die Einrichtung von “Versammlungen” bzw. “Parlamenten” in westeuropäischen Organisationen: “Staatsrechtlicher Reflex” oder “Demokratiepolitisches Feigenblatt” ’, unpublished manuscript.

Schulz, H. and König, T. (2000). ‘Institutional Reform and Decision‐Making Efficiency in the European Union’. American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 653–66.

Schwabe, K. (ed.) (1988). Die Anfänge des Schuman Plans 1950/51—The Beginnings of the Schuman Plan. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.

Scully, R. M. (2000). ‘Democracy, Legitimacy and the European Parliament’, in M. G. Cowles and M. Smith (eds.), The State of the European Union, Vol. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Selck, T. J. (2004). The Impact of Procedure: Analyzing European Union Legislative Decision‐Making. Göttingen:Cuvillier.

——  and Steunenberg, B. (2004). ‘Between Power and Luck: The European Parliament in the EU Legislative Process’. European Union Politics 5(1): 25–46.

Shackleton, Michael (1990). Financing the European Community. London: Pinter.

—— (2000). ‘The Politics of Codecision’. Journal of Common Market Studies 38(2): 325–42.

Spaak, P. H. (1971). The Continuing Battle. Memoirs of a European 1936–1966. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

(p.225) Spierenburg, D. and Poidevin, R. (1994). The History of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community. Supranationality in Operation. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Stein, E. (2001). ‘International Integration and Democracy: No Love at First Sight’. American Journal of International Law 95(3): 489–534.

Steunenberg, B. (1994). ‘Decision‐making under different institutional arrangements: Legislation by the European Community’. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150: 642–69.

—— and Dimitrova, A. (1999). ‘Interests, Legitimacy, and Constitutional Choice: The extension of the codecision procedure in Amsterdam’. Network on Enlargement and new Membership of the European Union, Working Paper No. 99–2.

Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with Judges. Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— (2002). ‘Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy’. West European Politics 25(1): 77–100.

Sypris, P. (2002). ‘Legitimising European Governance: Taking Subsidiarity Seriously within the Open Method of Coordination’, unpublished manuscript.

Thatcher, Margaret (1993). The Downing Street Years. London: HarperCollins Publishers.

Thatcher, Mark (2002). ‘Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation’. West European Politics 25(1): 125–47.

—— and Stone Sweet, A. (2002). ‘Theory and Practice of Delegation to Non‐Majoritarian Institutions’, West European Politics 25(1): 1–22.

Thiemeyer, G. (1998). ‘Supranationalität als Novum in der Geschichte der internationalen Politik der fünfziger Jahre’. Journal of European Integration History 4(2): 5–21.

Tsebelis, G. (1994). ‘The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda‐Setter’. American Political Science Review 88(1): 128–42.

—— (1995). ‘Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartyism’. British Journal of Political Science 25(3): 289–326.

—— (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

—— and Garrett, G. (2000). ‘Legislative Politics in the European Union’. European Union Politics 1(1): 9–36.

—— Jensen, C. B., Kalandrakis, A., and Kreppel, A. (2001). ‘Legislative Procedures in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis’. British Journal of Political Science 31(4): 573–599.

Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Vanberg, V. and Buchanan, J. M. (1989). ‘Interests and Theories in Constitutional Choice’. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1(1): 49–62.

von Beyme, K. (1998). ‘Niedergang der Parlamente. Internationale Politik und nationale Entscheidungshoheit’. Internationale Politik 53(4): 21–30.

—— (1999). Die Parlamentarische Demokratie. Entstehung und Funktionsweise. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

(p.226) Wagner, W. (1999). ‘Interessen und Ideen in der europäischen Verfassungspolitik. Rationalistische und konstruktivistische Erklärungen mitgliedstaatlicher Präferenzen’. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 40(3): 415–41.

—— (2001). ‘German EU Constitutional Foreign Policy’, in V. Rittberger (ed.), German Foreign Policy Since Unification. Theories and Case Studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

—— (2002). ‘The Subnational Foundations of the European Parliament’. Journal of International Relations and Development 5(1): 24–36.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.

Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, Volume I. New York: Bedminster Press.

—— (1992). Politik als Beruf. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam.

Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, U. R. Mayer, F. C. (1995). ‘European Democracy and its Critique’, in Jack Hayward (ed.), The Crisis of Representation in Europe. London: Frank Cass.

Wessels, B. (1999). ‘Political Integration in Europe: Is it possible to square the circle?’ European Integration online Papers (EioP), Vol. 3, No. 9, <http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999–009.htm>

—— (2002). ‘Parlamentarier in Europa und Europäische Integration: Einstellungen zur zukünftigen politischen Ordnung und zum institutionellen Wandel der EU’, paper prepared for the workshop ‘Wahlen und politische Einstellungen’ of the German Political Science Association (DVPW) Augsburg, 6–7 June 2002, <http://www.wz‐berlin.de/~wessels/Lehrveran/SS02/material/bw‐akw‐fin1a.pdf> (accessed 28 July 2002).

Wessels, W. (1996). ‘Institutions of the EU system: models of explanation’, in Dietrich Rometsch and Wolfgang Wessels (eds.), The European Union and Member States. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Westlake, M. (1994). A Modern Guide to the European Parliament. London: Pinter.

Whitaker, R. (2001). ‘Party Control in a Committee‐Based Legislature? The Case of the European Parliament’. Journal of Legislative Studies 7(4): 63–88.

Wilks, S. and Bartle, I. (2002). ‘The Unanticipated Consequences of Creating Independent Competition Agencies’. West European Politics 25(1): 148–72.

Williams, S. (1991). ‘Sovereignty and Accountability in the European Community’, in R. O. Keohane and S. Hoffmann (eds.), The New European Community. Decisionmaking and Institutional Change. Boulder: Westview Press.

Wood, G. S. (1998). The Creation of the American Republic 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

Zürn, M. (1996). ‘Über den Staat und die Demokratie im europäischen Mehrebenensystem’. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 37(1): 27–55.

—— (1998). Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

—— (2000). ‘Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation‐State: The EU and Other International Institutions’. European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 183–221.