Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Double-Effect ReasoningDoing Good and Avoiding Evil$

T. A. Cavanaugh

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780199272198

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2006

DOI: 10.1093/0199272190.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 24 February 2017

(p.202) Bibliography

(p.202) Bibliography

Source:
Double-Effect Reasoning
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

(p.202) Bibliography

Bibliography references:

ALAN OF LILLE (1855). De fide catholica, in Patrologia Latina, ed. J. P. Migne, vol. 210 (Paris).

ALEXANDER OF HALES (1948). Summa theologica (Florence).

ALONSO, V. (1937). Explicación del Derecho de Defensa según Santo Tomás de Aquino. Excerpta ex dissertatione. Pontificia Universitas Gregoriana, 213–46.

Anglican Communion News Service (2004). Bishops Oppose ‘misguided and unnecessary’ Euthanasia Bill. http://www.anglican communion.org/acns/articles/38/75/acns3880.cfm.

ANSCOMBE, G. E. M. (1957). Intention (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

—— (1970). ‘War and Murder’, in R. Wasserstrom (ed.), War and Morality (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth).

—— (1981). ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, in Ethics, Religion and Politics: The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, iii (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 26–42.

—— (1981). ‘The Two Kinds of Error in Action’, in Ethics, Religion and Politics: The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, vol. iii (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 3–9.

—— (1982). ‘Action, Intention and “Double Effect” ’, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 56: 12–25.

ANTONINUS (1959). Summa theologica, vols. i–iv (Graz: Akademische Druck).

(p.203) AQUINAS, T. (1891–9 edn.). Opera Omnia Sancti Thomae Aquiinatis, vols. vi–x (Rome: Typographia Polyglotta S. C. De Propaganda Fide).

ARISTOTLE (1985). Nicomachean Ethics, tr. T. Irwin (Indianapolis: Hackett).

AUSTEN, J. (1991). Emma (New York: Knopf).

BEABOUT, G. (1989). ‘Morphine Use for Terminal Cancer Patients: An Application of the Principle of Double Effect’, Philosophy in Context, 19: 49–58.

BEAUCHAMP, T. and CHILDRESS, J. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press).

BENNETT, J. (1966). ‘Whatever the Consequences’, Analysis, 26: 83–112.

—— (1995). The Act Itself (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

BOYLE, J. (1977). ‘Double‐effect and a Certain Type of Embryotomy’, Irish Theological Quarterly, 44: 303–18.

—— (1978). ‘Praeter Intentionem in Aquinas’, The Thomist, 42: 649–65.

—— (1980). ‘Toward Understanding the Principle of Double Effect’, Ethics, 90: 527–38.

—— (1991). ‘Who is Entitled to Double Effect?’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 16: 475–94.

BRATMAN, M. (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

BYOCK, I. (1997). Dying Well: Prospects for Growth at the End of Life (New York: Riverhead Books).

CAJETAN, T. (1891–9). Commentariis Prima et Secunda Secundae Summa Theologiae, in Opera Omnia Sancti Thomae Aquinatis, vols. vi–x (Rome: Typographia Polyglotta S. C. De Propaganda Fide).

CASEY, J. (1971). ‘Actions and Consequences’, in id. (ed.), Morality and Moral Reasoning (London: Methuen), 155–205.

(p.204) Catholic Church (1994). Catechism of the Catholic Church (Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference).

CAVANAUGH, T. (1997). ‘Aquinas's Account of Double Effect’, The Thomist, 61: 107–21.

CONNELL, F. (1967). ‘Principle of Double Effect’, in New Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. iv (New York: McGraw‐Hill), 1020–2.

COONEY, W. (1989). ‘Affirmative Action and the Doctrine of Double Effect’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 16: 201–4.

COUGHLAN, M. (1990). ‘Using People’, Bioethics, 4: 55–61.

D'ARCY, E. (1963). Human Acts (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

DAVIS, H. (1946). Moral and Pastoral Theology, vol. i, 4th edn. (London: Longman).

DE LUGO, J. (1868–9). Disputationes scholasticae et morales, vols. i–viii (Paris: Vivès).

DEVINE, P. (1974). ‘The Principle of Double Effect’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 19: 44–60.

DONAGAN, A. (1977). The Theory of Morality (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

—— (1985). ‘Comments on Dan Brock and Terrence Reynolds’, Ethics, 95: 874–86.

FINNIS, J. (1991). ‘Intention and Side‐Effects’, in R. Frey and C. Morris (eds.), Liability and Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 32–64.

—— BOYLE, J., and GRISEZ, G. (1987). Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

—— GRISEZ, G., and BOYLE, J. (2001). ‘ “Direct” and “Indirect”: A Reply to Critics of Our Action Theory’, The Thomist, 65: 1–44.

FISCHER, J., RAVIZZA, M., and COPP, D. (1993). ‘Quinn on Double Effect: The Problem of “Closeness” ’, Ethics, 103: 707–25.

FLANNERY, K. (2001). Acts Amid Precepts (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press).

(p.205) FOOT, P. (1978). ‘The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect’, in Virtues and Vices (Berkeley: University of California Press), 19–32.

—— (1985). ‘Morality, Action and Outcome’, in T. Honderich (ed.), Morality and Objectivity (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), 23–38.

FRANKENA, W. (1978). ‘McCormick and the Traditional Distinction’, in R. McCormick and P. Ramsey (eds.), Doing Evil to Achieve Good: Moral Choice in Conflict Situations (Chicago: Loyola University Press), 145–64.

—— (1980). Thinking About Morality (Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press).

FRIED, C. (1978). Right and Wrong (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

GARCIA, J. L. A. (1993). ‘The New Critique of Anti‐Consequentialist Moral Theory’, Philosophical Studies, 1: 1–32.

GHOOS, J. (1951). ‘L'Acte a double effet, étude de théologie positive’, Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, 27: 30–52.

GURY, J. (1874). Compendium Theologiae Moralis (Regensburg: Georgii Josephi Manz).

HART, H. L. A. (1967). ‘Intention and Punishment’, The Oxford Review, 4: 5–22.

HOOSE, B. (1987). Proportionalism: The American Debate and its European Roots (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).

JOHN PAUL II, POPE (1980). Acta Apostolica Sedis, 72 (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana).

—— (1993). Veritatis Splendor (Boston: St Paul Books and Media).

JONSEN, A. and TOULMIN, S. (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry (Berkeley: University of California Press).

(p.206) KACZOR, C. (2002). Proportionalism and the Natural Law Tradition (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press).

KAMM, F. (1992). ‘Non‐consequentialism, the Person as End‐in‐Itself, and the Significance of Status’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21: 354–89.

—— (1996). Morality, Mortality: Rights, Duties, and Status, vol. ii (New York: Oxford University Press).

KANT, I. (1998). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, tr. M. Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

KENNY, A. (1968). ‘Intention and Purpose in Law’, in R. S. Summers (ed.), Essays in Legal Philosophy (Berkeley: University of California Press), 146–63.

—— (1973). ‘The History of Intention in Ethics’, in The Anatomy of the Soul: Historical Essays in the Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 129–47.

KHATCHADOURIAN, H. (1988). ‘Is the Principle of Double Effect Morally Acceptable?’, International Philosophical Quarterly, 28: 21–30.

KNAUER, P. (1967a). ‘The Hermeneutic Function of the Principle of Double Effect’, Natural Law Forum, 12: 132–62.

—— (1967b). ‘The Principle of the Double Effect’, Theology Digest, 15: 100–5.

LEVY, S. (1986). ‘The Principle of Double Effect’, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 20: 29–40.

LIGUORI, A. (1954). Opera Moralia, vols. i–iv (Graz: Akademische Druck).

LYONS, E. (2005). ‘In Incognito—The Principle of Double Effect in American Constitutional Law’, Florida Law Review, 57: 469–563.

MCCORMICK, R. (1973). Ambiguity in Moral Choice (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).

(p.207) MCINERNY, R. (1992). Aquinas on Human Action: A Theory of Practice (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press).

MCMAHAN, J. (1994). ‘Revising the Doctrine of Double Effect’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 11: 201–12.

MANGAN, J. (1949). ‘An Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect’, Theological Studies, 10: 41–61.

MARQUIS, D. (1978). ‘Some Difficulties with Double Effect’, The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 9: 27–34.

MATTHEWS, G. (1999). ‘Saint Thomas and the Principle of Double Effect’, in S. MacDonald and E. Stump (eds.), Aquinas's Moral Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 63–78.

MILL, J. (2001). Utilitarianism (Indianapolis: Hackett).

MOORE, G. (1954). Principia Ethica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

NAGEL, T. (1979). Mortal Questions (New York: Cambridge University Press).

—— (1980). ‘The Limits of Objectivity’, in S. McMurrin (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press), 77–139.

—— (1986). The View from Nowhere (New York: Oxford University Press).

OAKLEY, J. and COCKING, D. (1994). ‘Consequentialism, Moral Responsibility, and the Intention/Foresight Distinction’, Utilitas, 6: 201–16.

ODERBERG, D. (2000). Moral Theory: A Non‐consequentialist Approach (Oxford: Blackwell).

O'DONNELL, T. (1991). Medicine and Christian Morality (New York: Alba House).

PASCAL , B. (1943). Les Provinciales (Paris: Éditions de Cluny).

PATON , H. (1965). The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy, 5th edn. (London: Hutchinson).

(p.208) PATON, H. (1966). The Moral Law: Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals (London: Hutchinson).

PIUS XII, POPE (1957). Acta Apostolica Sedis, 49 (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana).

POINSOT, J. (John of St Thomas) (1885). Cursus Theologicus, vols. i–x (Paris: Vivès).

QUINN, W. (1989). ‘Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18: 334–51.

RAMSEY, P. (1978). ‘Incommensurability and Indeterminacy in Moral Choice’, in R. McCormick and P. Ramsey (eds.), Doing Evil to Achieve Good: Moral Choice in Conflict Situations (Chicago: Loyola University Press), 69–144.

ROBERTS, A. and GUELFF, R. (eds.) (2000). Documents on the Laws of War, 3rd edn. (New York: Oxford University Press).

ROJAS, J. (1995). ‘St. Thomas' Treatise on Self‐Defense Revisited’, Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale, 62, Supplementa, 1, Thomistica, 89–123.

SALMANTICENSIS (1877). Cursus Theologicus, vols. i–xx. (Paris).

Salvation Army (2004). Positional Statement on Euthanasia. http://www.salvationarmy.org.nz/SITE_Default/SITE_about/positional_ statements.asp.

SELLING, J. (1980). ‘The Problem of Reinterpreting the Principle of Double Effect’, Louvain Studies, 8: 47–62.

STERBA, J. (1992). ‘Reconciling Pacifists and Just War Theorists’, Social Theory and Practice, 18: 21–37.

SUAREZ, F. (1856). Opera omnia, vols. i–xxviii (Paris: Vivès).

SULLIVAN, D. (2000). ‘The Doctrine of Double Effect and the Domain of Moral Responsibility’, The Thomist, 64: 423–48.

UGORJI, L. (1985). The Principle of Double Effect; A Critical Appraisal of its Traditional Understanding and its Modern Reinterpretation (Frankfurt: Peter Lang).

(p.209) US Catholic Conference of Bishops (2001). Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services, 4th edn. (Washington, DC: USCCB).

VITORIA , F. (1997 edn). Relection on Homicide & Commentary on Summa theologiae IIaIIae Q. 64, tr. Doyle (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).

WALSH, J. and MCQUEEN, M. (1993). ‘The Morality of Induced Delivery of the Anencephalic Fetus Prior to Viability’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 3: 357–69.

WALZER, M. (1977). Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books).

WILLIAMS, J., PRITCHARD, J., MACDONALD, P., and GANT, N. (1985). Williams Obstetrics (Norwalk, Conn.: Appleton‐ Century‐Crofts).

WINDASS, S. (1963). ‘Double Think and Double Effect’, Blackfriars, 44: 257–66. (p.210)