Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Between Anarchy and SocietyTrusteeship and the Obligations of Power$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

William Bain

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780199260263

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2004

DOI: 10.1093/0199260265.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 April 2019

The New Paternalism

The New Paternalism

Chapter:
(p.140) 6 The New Paternalism
Source:
Between Anarchy and Society
Author(s):

William Bain

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199260265.003.0006

On 1 Nov 1994, the UN Trusteeship Council voted to suspend operations after Palau, the last remaining trust territory, attained independence. The sovereign state has emerged out of decolonization as the supreme form of political organization in post‐colonial international society—an international society in which dominions, colonies, principalities, free cities, and, of course, mandates and trust territories have all but vanished. However, the ostensible failure of this post‐colonial project—the fact that the promise of peace and prosperity held out by independent statehood is too often betrayed by appalling violence and absolute poverty—has reinvigorated interest in trusteeship as a way of responding to problems of international disorder and injustice. The purpose of this chapter is threefold: first, it examines the principal dilemma of decolonization that has resulted in a renewed interest in trusteeship; second, it considers this renewed interest in trusteeship in the context of international involvement in administering Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, and, until recently, East Timor; third, it reflects upon the normative implications that a resurrected practice of trusteeship carries for a society of states that is premised on the juridical equality of all its members. The five sections of the chapter are: The False Promise of post‐Colonial Independence; Innovation and Convention—the case for trusteeship in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, and East Timor; The New International Legitimacy—the resurrection of trusteeship; A Universal Society of States?; and Answering the Call of Humanity.

Keywords:   Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brahimi Report, Charter of Paris, Dayton Agreement, decolonization, democracy, doctrine of international community, East Timor, equality, failed states, free market economy, human rights, human security, independence, independence, independent statehood, injustice, international disorder, international injustice, International Legitimacy, international society, juridical equality, Kosovo, Office of the High Representative, paternalism, peace operations, peacekeeping, post‐Colonial Independence, post‐colonial international society, poverty, Security Council, sovereign state, sovereignty, Trusteeship, UN Trusteeship Council, unjust states, UNMIK, UNTAET, violence

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .